SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Toraks Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of high PEEP levels and high PEEP levels with recruitment maneuvers in patients with ARDS

Akut solunum sıkıntısı sendromunda mekanik ventilasyon tedavisinde yüksek PEEP düzeyleri ile recruitment manevrası uygulamasının etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması

Gül GÜRSEL
Ferit TANERİ
Haluk TÜRKTAŞ
Pages
92–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, RM had no effect on oxygenation and hemodynamics in ARDS patients ventilated with a lung protective strategy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to analyze the physiologic effects of recruitment maneuvers (RM) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) ventilated with a lung protective strategy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirteen patients were enrolled, and 11 of them had primary ARDS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, RM had no effect on oxygenation and hemodynamics in ARDS patients ventilated with a lung protective strategy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pozitif-basınçlı solunum · Solunum güçlüğü sendromu · erişkin

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the physiologic effects of recruitment maneuvers (RM) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) ventilated with a lung protective strategy. Thirteen patients were enrolled, and 11 of them had primary ARDS. RM consisted of 2 min of pressure-controlled ventilation at a peak pressure of 45 cmH2O and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 10 cmH2O. Oxygenation did not change at first and 60th min after RM in the patients. RM induced changes in hemodynamics were not observed. In conclusion, RM had no effect on oxygenation and hemodynamics in ARDS patients ventilated with a lung protective strategy.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı akciğerleri koruyucu mekanik ventilasyon stratejisi ile ventile edilen hastalarda Recruitment Manevrası (RM)’nın fizyolojik etkilerini analiz etmektir. Bu amaçla çalışmaya 13 hasta alındı bunlarda 11’i primer ARDS’liydi. RM basınç kontrollü mekanik ventilasyonla ve zirve havayolu basıncı 45 cm H2O olacak şekilde ve 10 cmH2O PEEP düzeyi ile yapılmıştır. Hastalara 1 saat içinde 4 kez ve her biri iki dakika sürecek şekilde RM yapılmıştır. RM dan hemen ve 60 dakika sonra oksijenizasyonda anlamlı değişiklik olmamıştır ve RM hastalarının hemodinamisinde anlamlı bozulmaya neden olmamıştır. Sonuç olarak bu çalışmada akciğerleri koruyucu mekanik ventilasyonla ventile edilen hastalarda RM ları kan gazları ve hemodinamiyi etkilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSEL, G., TANERİ, F., TÜRKTAŞ, H. (2007). Comparison of high PEEP levels and high PEEP levels with recruitment maneuvers in patients with ARDS. Toraks Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 92–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/367913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. MacIntyre NR. Mechanical ventilator strategies for lung protection. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Med 2000: 215-22
  2. Dreyfuss D, Soler P, Basset G, Saumon G. High infl ation pressure pulmonary edema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:1159-64
  3. Stewart TE, Meade MO, Cook DJ et al. Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: Pressure-and volume-limited ventilation strategy Group. N Eng J Med 1998;338:335-61
  4. Brower RG, Shanholtz CB, Fressler HE et al. Prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:1492-8
  5. Durante G, Turco MD, Rustichini L et al. ARDSNet lower tidal volume ventilatory strategy may generate intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute respiraory distress syndrome Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 1271-4
  6. Foti G, Cereda M, Sparacino ME et al. Eff ects of periodic lung recruitment maneuvers on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) patients. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26:501-7
  7. Lim C, Koh Y, Park W et al. Mechanistic scheme and eff ect of “extended sigh” as a recruitment maneuver in patient with acute respiratory distress sydrome: A preliminary study. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1255-60
  8. Patroniti N, Foti G, Cortinovis B et al. Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:788-94
  9. Pelosi P, Cadringher P, Bottino N et al. Sigh in acute respiratory distress sydrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:872-80
  10. Ferguson N, Stewart TE. New Th erapies for adults with acute lung injury. High frequency oscillatory ventilation. Crit Care Clin 2002;18: 91-106
  11. Çakar N, Kloot TV, Youngblood M et al. Oxygenation response to a recruitment maneuver during supine and prone positions in an oleic acid-induced lung injury model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161: 1949-56
  12. Lapinsky SE, Aubin M, Mehta S et al. Safety and effi cacy of a sustained infl ation for alveolar recruitment in adults with respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:1297-301
  13. Grasso S, Mascia L, Turco M et al. Eff ects of recruiting maneuvers in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with protective ventila