Journals / Toplum ve Hekim / 2012 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5

Abortion in The United Kingdom

Birleşik Krallık'ta Kürtaj

Pages
361–375
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite United Kingdom is consist of four government, England, Wales and Scotland are examined at one part, Ireland is banned, was examined separately.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, legal regulations of abortion in The United Kingdom after 1800s were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The content of five legal abortion regulations that we have reached (1803 The Ellonborough Act, The 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, The 1929 Infant Life Preservation Act, The 1967 Abortion Act, The 1990 Human Fertilization and Embryology Act) was investigated together with the social conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite United Kingdom is consist of four government, England, Wales and Scotland are examined at one part, Ireland is banned, was examined separately.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this article, legal regulations of abortion in The United Kingdom after 1800s were investigated. The content of five legal abortion regulations that we have reached (1803 The Ellonborough Act, The 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, The 1929 Infant Life Preservation Act, The 1967 Abortion Act, The 1990 Human Fertilization and Embryology Act) was investigated together with the social conditions. At the same time, how abortion becomes legalized and in this process the role of women organizations, religion and politicians were also examined. Despite United Kingdom is consist of four government, England, Wales and Scotland are examined at one part, Ireland is banned, was examined separately.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Birleşik Krallık'ta 1800'lü yıllardan sonra yapılan kürtaj ile ilgili yasal düzenlemeler incelendi. Birleşik Krallık'ta kürtaj ile ilgili ulaşabildiðimiz beş yasal düzenlemenin (1803 Ellonborough Yasası, 1861 Kişi Haklarına Karşı İşlenen Suçlar Yasası, 1929 Bebeðin Yaşamını Koruma Yasası, 1967 Kürtaj Yasası ve 1990 İnsan Fertilizasyon ve Embriyoloji Yasası) içeriði dönemin toplumsal koşullarıyla birlikte deðerlendirildi. Aynı zamanda kürtajın, yasalaşma sürecinin nasıl olduðu ve bu süreçte kadın örgütlerinin, dini inançların ve parlamenterlerin etkisi de ele alındı. Birleşik Krallık, dört devletten oluşsa da bu makalede, İngiltere, Galler ve İskoçya tek bir bölümde, İrlanda ise ayrı bir ülke olarak incelendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZENGİN, Ü. İ. (2012). Abortion in The United Kingdom. Toplum ve Hekim, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5, 361–375. https://ajindex.com/articles/367707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ashton, J.R., Machin, D., Osmond, C. (1983a). Trends in induced abortion in England and Wales, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,( 37):105-110.
  2. Ashton, J.R. (1983b).Trends in induced abortion in England And Wales, British Medical Journal, (287):1001-1002.
  3. Brooke, S. (2001) A new world for women”? Abortion law reform in Britain during The 1930s.
  4. American Historical Review, April: 431-459.
  5. Boddu, R. (2011). A review of abortion in Ireland. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Student Medical Journal, 4(1):78-81.
  6. Carrol, P. (2011) Legally induced Abortion: The Demographic Profi le And Hazards To The Health Of Women. Ethno Med, 5(1): 1-10.
  7. Conroy, P. (2012) Ireland: Rape and incest not grounds for abortion. Reproductive laws for the 21st Century Papers Center For Women Policy Studies. 1-11. Erişim adresi: http://www.centerwomenpolicy. org/programs/health/statepolicy/REPRO_Ireland- RapeandIncestNotGrou ndsforAbortion_Pauline- Conroy.pdf.pdf Davis, C. (2007) Forty years on. Nursing Standard, (21)30: 18-19.
  8. Department of Health. (2012). National statistics. Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2011. Erişim adresi: http://mediacentre.dh.gov. uk/2012/05/29/abortion-statistics-england-wales- 2011/ Erişim tarihi: 28.10.2012
  9. Dyer, C. (2007). Experts clash over reducing abortion limit. British Medical Journal, (335):789. European Court of Human Rights. (2010) Rights to abortion in Ireland. Erişim adresi: http:// www.hrw.org/news/2010/12/16/ireland-europeancourt- says-abortion-rights-issue. Family Planning Association for Northern Ireland-FPANI. (2003). Sexual health information. Abortion: FACTS. May 2003. 1-6.
  10. Fox, M. (2009) The human fertilisation and embryology act 2008: Tinkering at the margins. Feminist Legal Studies, 17: 333-344.
  11. Francome, C. (2004) Abortion in the USA and the UK. British Medical Journal, (329):236. Francome, C. (2005) Reports and surveys. Abortion: Why the issue has not disappeared. 49(2):217- 222. Furedi, A. (1999) The public health implications of the 1995 ‘pill scare’. Human Reproduction Update, (5)6: 621-626.
  12. Gornall, J. (2007) Where do we draw the line? British Medical Journal, (334): 285-289.
  13. Griffith, R., Tengnah, C. (2007a) Termination of pregnancy: A case for a change in the law. Legal issues. British Journal of Community Nursing, (12):7. Griffith, R. (2007b) Abortion law: An opportunity to inform the debate. British Journal of Midwifery, (15)8: 514-515.
  14. Gilmartin M., White A. (2011) Comparative perspectives symposium: Gen