SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Toplum ve Hekim / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Class Analysis of Media: Realities of Labour and Illusions of Capital

MEDYANIN SINIFSAL TEMELLERİ: EMEĞİN GERÇEKLERİ VE SERMAYENİN İLLÜZYONLARI

Gamze ÖZDEMİR YÜCESAN
ÇAĞRI KADEROĞLU BULUT
Pages
85–95
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, media is examined under three subtitles: media as a space of capital accumulation, media as a space of class struggle and media as a means of class struggle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Media industry is based on a symbolic production process through which social communication and relations are publicly circulated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When media space is thought together with today's discussions such as "censorship-autocensorship", "monopolization", "precarity", "freedom of thought", "control", "deskilling", "advocacy" and "embedded journalism", the analysis of the class relations of this space becomes much more critical.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, media is examined under three subtitles: media as a space of capital accumulation, media as a space of class struggle and media as a means of class struggle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Media industry is based on a symbolic production process through which social communication and relations are publicly circulated. When media space is thought together with today's discussions such as "censorship-autocensorship", "monopolization", "precarity", "freedom of thought", "control", "deskilling", "advocacy" and "embedded journalism", the analysis of the class relations of this space becomes much more critical. In this study, media is examined under three subtitles: media as a space of capital accumulation, media as a space of class struggle and media as a means of class struggle.

Özet

Medya endüstrisi, toplumsal iletişim ve ilişkilerin dolaşımını kamusal olarak gerçekleştiren bir sembolik üretim alanıdır. Günümüzde medya alanı, "siyasal iktidarla ilişkiler", "sansür-otosansür", "holdingleşme", "yandaşlık", "güvencesizlik", "düşünce özgürlüğü", "denetim", "niteliksizleşme", "iliştirilmiş gazetecilik" gibi tartışmalar ile birlikte düşünüldüğünde, bu alandaki sınıf ilişkilerinin incelenmesi daha da önemli hale gelmektedir. Bu çalışmada medya, üç alt başlık altında, sermaye birikim alanı olarak, sınıf mücadelesi alanı olarak ve sınıf mücadelesi aracı olarak irdelenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCESAN, G. Ö., BULUT, Ç. K. (2016). Class Analysis of Media: Realities of Labour and Illusions of Capital. Toplum ve Hekim, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 85–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/367632

References (24)

  1. Ashton, D. (2011). Media Work and the Creative Industries: Identity Work, Professionalism and Employability, Education Training, 52(6) 546 - 560. Bagdikian, B. H. (1987).
  2. Th e Media Monopoly, Erişim tarihi: 5 Ocak 2016. http://www.multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1987/09/bagdikian.html.
  3. Bagdikian, B. H. (1997).
  4. Th e Media Monopoly, Boston: Beacon Press.
  5. Bailey, C. (2000). Th e Labour Movement and Th e Internet, Erişim tarihi: 20 Ocak 2016. http://www.amrc.org.hk/content/labour-movement-and-internet.
  6. Beniger, J.R. (1986). Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of Information Society, Canada: Harvard University Press.
  7. Cangöz, İ. (2015). Değişen Anlam ve Değerleriyle Gazetecilik, Ankara:
  8. Sınırsız Yayınları.
  9. Cleaver, H. (2005). Th e Zapatista Eff ect: Th e Internet and Th e Rise of an Alternative Political Fabric, Erişim tarihi: 18 Ocak 2016. http://libcom.org/library/zapatista-eff ect-cleaver. Doyle, G. (2013).
  10. Understanding Media Economics, Londra: Sage. Doyle, G. (2004).
  11. Changes in Media Ownership, Sociological Review, 13: (3) 2-4.
  12. Dyer-Witheford, N. (2004). Siber Marx (çev. A. Çakıroğlu), İstanbul:
  13. Aykırı Yayınları.
  14. Evrensel Gazetesi (2006). Öğretmenlerden Radyo İşgalleri (23.08.2006), Erişim tarihi: 23 Ocak 2016. http://www.evrensel.net/v1/06/08/23/dunya.html#2.
  15. Geray, H. (2002). İletişim ve Teknoloji: Uluslararası Birikim Düzeninde Yeni Medya Politikaları, Ankara:
  16. Ütopya Yayınevi.
  17. Golding, P. Murdock, G. (2002).
  18. Kültür, İletişim ve Ekonomi Politik (çev: B. Kejanlıoğlu), Medya Kültür Siyaset (içinde), Süleyman İrvan (der.): 59-97, Ankara:
  19. Alp Yayınevi.
  20. Hamelink, C. (2003).
  21. Statement On Communication Rights, Paper Presented At Th e World Forum Of Communication Rights. Cenevre. Hardt, M., Negri, A. (2004). Çokluk: İmparatorluk Çağında Savaş ve Demokrasi (çev. B. Yıldırım), İstanbul:
  22. Ayrıntı. Henten, A., R., Samarajiva, R., Melody W.H. (2003). Designing Next Generation Telecom Regulation: ICT Convergence or Multisector Utility?. Erişim tarihi: 9 Ocak 2016. http:// regulationbodyofk nowledge.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/ Henten_Designing_Next_Generation.pdf. Herman, E., McChesney, R. (1998). Global Media: New Missionaries of Global Capitalism, Londra: Continuum. Hesmondhalgh, D., Toynbee, J. (2008).
  23. Th e Media and Social Th eory, Londra: Routledge. Hoskins, C., McFadyen, S., Finn, A. (2004). Media Economics: Applying Economics to New and Traditional Media, Londra: Sage. Hodson, R. (2001).
  24. Dignity at Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University