Öngider describes the mass support that the socialist movement enjoyed as a continuation of “68”, its anti-imperialist and anti-fascist characteristics as well as bottlenecks faced towards the end of the 70s and a portrait of younger generation revolutionaries in this process.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öngider describes the mass support that the socialist movement enjoyed as a continuation of “68”, its anti-imperialist and anti-fascist characteristics as well as bottlenecks faced towards the end of the 70s and a portrait of younger generation revolutionaries in this process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Öngider describes the mass support that the socialist movement enjoyed as a continuation of “68”, its anti-imperialist and anti-fascist characteristics as well as bottlenecks faced towards the end of the 70s and a portrait of younger generation revolutionaries in this process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Öngider describes the mass support that the socialist movement enjoyed as a continuation of “68”, its anti-imperialist and anti-fascist characteristics as well as bottlenecks faced towards the end of the 70s and a portrait of younger generation revolutionaries in this process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Öngider describes the mass support that the socialist movement enjoyed as a continuation of “68”, its anti-imperialist and anti-fascist characteristics as well as bottlenecks faced towards the end of the 70s and a portrait of younger generation revolutionaries in this process.
Özet
Yazıda 68’in “devamı olarak” sosyalist hareketin kitleselliğe antiemperyalist, antifaşist özellikleri ile birlikte 70’lerin sonuna doğru yaşanan açmazları aktarılıyor. Bu süreçte yer alan devrimci gençlerin karakteristikleri tanımlanmaktadır.
🔖
Cite This Article
ÖNGİDER, S. (2013). Being a revolutionary in the 70s. Toplum ve Hekim, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 333–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/367545