Journals / Toplum ve Hekim / 2013 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

An overview of diagnosis related groups and Turkey

Tanı temelli gruplara bir bakış ve Türkiye

Pages
54–65
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experiences indicate that prospective payment doesn t change post-discharge readmission rates to hospitals, overall expenditure on health, post-discharge mortality rates, reduces hospital costs, length of stay in hospital, induces instable discharges, post-discharge nursing home admissions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In most of the countries, half to two third of health budgets are paid on hospital reimbursements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 1983 Medicare in USA started a new prospective reimbursement system based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) to control hospital costs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experiences indicate that prospective payment doesn t change post-discharge readmission rates to hospitals, overall expenditure on health, post-discharge mortality rates, reduces hospital costs, length of stay in hospital, induces instable discharges, post-discharge nursing home admissions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In most of the countries, half to two third of health budgets are paid on hospital reimbursements. In 1983 Medicare in USA started a new prospective reimbursement system based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) to control hospital costs. DRG constructed by grouping International Calssification of Diseases codes seeking statistical and clinical consistency. After legislation by federal government in 1983, system has been applied in most of the western countries. Experiences indicate that prospective payment doesn t change post-discharge readmission rates to hospitals, overall expenditure on health, post-discharge mortality rates, reduces hospital costs, length of stay in hospital, induces instable discharges, post-discharge nursing home admissions. Hospital administrations increases their income by upcoding. Hence, the expected rise of hospital admissions did not happened. A study which conducted in psychiatry hospitals indicated that, hospitals increased the length of stay of patients who might be stayed shorter to attract them after the implementation of the prospetive payment method. In 2004, in the content of Health Transformation, as a part of Hacettepe University Research Project, Ministry of Health in Turkey started to implement prospective payment system based on DRG. By November 2011, a part of 538 Ministry of Health hospitals are paid based on DRG.

Özet

Birçok ülkede hastane harcamaları sağlık bütçelerinin yarısı veya üçte ikisini oluşturmaktadır. 1983te ABDde Medicare, hastanelere ayrılan bütçeyi kontrol etmek için Tanı Temelli Gruplara (TTG) dayalı ileriye dönük ödemeyi yürürlüğe koymuştur. TTG Hastalıkların Uluslararası Sınıfl andırması (ICD) kodlarının istatistik ve klinik tutarlılık temelinde gruplandırılmasıyla oluşturulmuştur. 1983te federal hükümetin yasalaştırmasından sonra, ödeme sistemi birçok Batı ülkesinde de uygulanmıştır. Deneyimler ileriye dönük ödemenin taburculuk sonrası yeniden başvuruları, genel sağlık harcamalarını, taburculuk sonrası mortaliteyi değiştirmediğini, hastane maliyetlerini, hastanede ortalama yatış gün sayısını azalttığını, instabil taburculukları ve taburculuk sonrası bakımevlerine başvuruları artırdığını göstermektedir. Hastane yönetimleri gelirlerini artırmak adına, hastaları benzer hastalıklar arasında daha yüksek gelir sağlayan kodlara yığmaktadırlar. Ancak ileriye dönük ödemenin yürürlüğe girmesi sonrası hastane başvurularında beklenen artış gerçekleşmemiştir. Psikiyatri hastanelerinde yapılan bir çalışma, ileriye dönük ödemeye geçildikten sonra, hastanelerin kısa dönem yatması gereken hastaları etkilemek için yatışlarını uzattığını göstermiştir. Türkiyede çalışmalar Sağlıkta Dönüşüm kapsamında, 2004 yılında Hacettepe Üniversitesi Araştırma Projesinin bir parçası olarak başlamıştır. 2011 yılı Kasım ayında, 538 Sağlık Bakanlığı Hastanesi ödemelerinin bir kısmını TTG üzerinden almıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKOYUN, İ. E. (2013). An overview of diagnosis related groups and Turkey. Toplum ve Hekim, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 54–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/367537

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Barros PP, Braun G, Upcoding in a NHS (2009) “Prospective payment and Health Care Provision”, November 20-21,
  2. Barcelona, Spain Başara Ü, Cesur C, Kurt Ç (2011),
  3. Teşhisle Ilgili Gruplar E-Kitap, T.C.Sağlık Bakanlığı Performans Gelişimi Kalite Geliştirme Daire Başkanlığı, v1.1.0, 14 Mart Chulis GS. (1991), Assessing Medicare’s prospective payment system for hospitals, Medicare Review, Summer; 48(2) Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) and the Medicare Program: Implications for Medical Technology-A Technical Memorandum (1983),
  4. Washington DC, U.S. Congress, Off ice of Technology Assessment, OTA-TM-H 17-July, sf 23-25
  5. Ellis RP, McGuire TG (1996) Hospital response to prospective payment: Moral hazard, selection, and practice-style eff ects, Journal of Health Economics 15 Fetter RB, Shin Y, Freeman JL, Averill RF, Th ompson JD (1980), Case Mix Definition by Diagnosis-Related Groups, Medical Care, Vol. 18, No. 2, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3764138, erişim tarihi: 16/09/2011
  6. Fetter RB (1991), Diagnosis Related Groups: Understanding Hospital Performance, Interfaces, Vol. 21, No. 1, Franz Edelman Award Papers, Jan. - Feb. Gerdtham UG, Löthgren M, Tambour M, Rehnberg C. (1999) Internal markets and health care eff iciency: a multiple-output stochastic frontier analysis, Health Economics, Volume 8, Issue 2, pages 151-164,
  7. March Goldfield N. (2010) Th e Evolution of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs): From Its Beginnings in Case-Mix and Resource Use Th eory, to Its Implementation for Payment and Now for Its Current Utilization for Quality Within and Outside the Hospital, Quality Management Health Care /Volume 19, Issue 1, y-March Horn SD, Sharkey PD, Chambers AF, Horn RA (1985) Severity of illness within DRGs: impact on prospective payment, American Journal of Public Health, October, Vol. 75, No. 10 Hsiao WC, Sapolsky HM, Dunn DL, Weiner SL (1986), Lessons of the New Jersey DRG payment system, Health Aff airs, 5, no.2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnosis-related_group (erişim tarihi 19.02.2012) http://www.eurodrg.eu/about.html, erişim tarihi (15.03.2012)
  8. Kahn KL, Draper D, Keeler EB, Rogers WH, Rubenstein LV, Kosecoff J, Sherwood MJ, Fleinisch EJ, Carney MF, Kamberg CJ, Bentow SB, Wells KB, Allen H, Reboussin D, Roth CP, Chew C, Brook RH (1991), Th e Eff ects of the DRG-Based Prospectivev Payment System on Quality of Care for Hospitalized Medicare Patients Executive Summary, ISBN: 0-8330-1135-9
  9. Kominski GF, Witsberger C. (1993), Trends in length of stay for Medicare patients: