Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 8

The awareness, efficacy, safety, and time in therapeutic range of warfarin in the Turkish population: WARFARIN-TR

Pages
595–600
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was thought that low TTR levels of the Turkish population may be caused by the low awareness of warfarin, warfarin's food-drug interactions, and high rates of concomitant diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The awareness, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and safety of warfarin therapy were investigated in the adult Turkish population.Methods: This multicenter prospective study includes 4987 patients using warfarin and involved regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Awareness was evaluated based on the patients' knowledge of warfarin's affect and food-drug interactions.Results: The mean TTR of patients was 49.52±22.93%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was thought that low TTR levels of the Turkish population may be caused by the low awareness of warfarin, warfarin's food-drug interactions, and high rates of concomitant diseases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The awareness, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and safety of warfarin therapy were investigated in the adult Turkish population.Methods: This multicenter prospective study includes 4987 patients using warfarin and involved regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014. TTR was calculated according to F.R. Roosendaal's algorithm. Awareness was evaluated based on the patients' knowledge of warfarin's affect and food-drug interactions.Results: The mean TTR of patients was 49.52±22.93%. The patients with hypertension (55.3%), coronary artery disease (23.2%), congestive heart failure (24.5%), or smoking habit (20.8%) had significantly lower TTR levels than the others. Of the total number of patients, 42.6% had a mechanical valve, 38.4% had non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and 19% had other indications for warfarin. Patients with other indications had lower TTR levels than those with mechanical valve and non-valvular AF (p=0.018). Warfarin awareness decreased in higher age groups. The knowledge of warfarin's food-drug interactions was 55%. People with higher warfarin awareness had higher TTR levels. Patients with <=8 INR monitoring/year had lower TTR levels (46.4±25.3 vs. 51.1±21.3, respectively, p<0.001) and lower awareness (44.6% vs. 60.6%, p<0.001) than patients with >=8 INR monitoring/year. In this study, 20.1% of the patients had a bleeding event (major bleeding 15.8%, minor bleeding 84.2%) within a year. Conclusion: Both the mean TTR ratios and awareness of the Turkish population on warfarin therapy were found to be low. It was thought that low TTR levels of the Turkish population may be caused by the low awareness of warfarin, warfarin's food-drug interactions, and high rates of concomitant diseases.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, A., İZCİ, S., KOBAT, M. A., ATEŞ, A. H., ÇAKMAK, A., ÇAKILLI, Y. (2016). The awareness, efficacy, safety, and time in therapeutic range of warfarin in the Turkish population: WARFARIN-TR. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 8, 595–600. https://ajindex.com/articles/367296

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Horton JD, Bushwick BM. Warfarin therapy: evolving strategies in anticoagulation. Am Fam Physician 1999; 59: 635-46.
  2. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, Crowther M, Palareti G; American College of Chest Physicians. Pharmacology and man- agement of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edi- tion) Chest 2008; 133: 160S-98S. Jones M, McEwan P, Morgan CL, Peters JR, Goodfellow J, Currie CJ. Evaluation of the pattern of treatment, level of anticoagulation control, and outcome of treatment with warfarin in patients with non-valvar atrial fibrillation: a record linkage study in a large British population. Heart 2005; 91: 472-7.
  3. Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD, Alings M, Flather M, Franzosi MG, et al. RE-LY investigators. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international nor- malised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 975-83.
  4. Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J, Flaker G, Commerford P, Franzosi MG, et al. ACTIVE W Investigators. Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation 2008; 118: 2029-37.
  5. White HD, Gruber M, Feyzi J, Kaatz S, Tse HF, Husted S, et al. Com- parison of outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin thera- py according to anticoagulant control: results from SPORTIF III and V. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 239-45.
  6. Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, Briet E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69: 236-9.
  7. Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuünemann HJ; American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel. Executive summary: Antithrom- botic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American Col- lege of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guide- lines. Chest 2012; 141(2 Suppl): 7S-47S. Pengo V, Pegoraro C, Cucchini U, Iliceto S. Worldwide management of oral anticoagulant therapy: the ISAM study. J Thromb Throm- bolysis 2006; 21: 73-7.
  8. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibril- lat