Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Effects of Chemical and Organic Fertilizer Treatments on Yield and Quality Traits of Industrial Tomato

Pages
213–221
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Present findings revealed that chemical fertilizers were essential for high and economic yield levels in tomato farming, but organic fertilizers should also be supplemented to improve tomato fruit quality attributes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Increasing plant production by protecting the environment is one of the main goals of today's agriculture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried out in field conditions to determine the effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on yield and quality characteristics of industrial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L., cv.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Present findings revealed that chemical fertilizers were essential for high and economic yield levels in tomato farming, but organic fertilizers should also be supplemented to improve tomato fruit quality attributes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:verim · kalite · organik gübreler

Abstract

Increasing plant production by protecting the environment is one of the main goals of today's agriculture. On the other hand, the use of both inorganic and organic fertilizers is becoming increasingly extensive. This study was carried out in field conditions to determine the effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on yield and quality characteristics of industrial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L., cv. Heinz 1015 F1). For this purpose, contents of fruit total soluble solid contents, total dry matter, titratable acidity, lycopene, total carotenoids, and vitamin C contents and yield (marketable yield and paste yield) were determined. Experiments were conducted in randomized blocks design with 3 replications. There were seven experimental treatments as of control (without fertilizer), chemical fertilizer, organic farmyard manure, sheep manure, poultry manure, vermicompost and leonardite. According to the research results, the highest marketable and tomato paste yield were obtained from chemical fertilizer, followed by organic fertilizers and the lowest values were obtained from the control. As compared to chemical fertilizers, organic fertilizers influenced fruit quality attributes more positively. The highest lycopene, total carotenoid and vitamin C contents were obtained from organic fertilizers, especially from poultry manure. Fruit soluble solids and dry matter contents, important processing traits assumed by tomato industry, were obtained from poultry manure treatments. Fruits from leonardite-treated plants had considerably higher titratable acidity levels. Except for total dry matter and titratable acidity, lowest values of quality parameters considered important in industrial tomatoes were obtained from unfertilized (control) plots. Present findings revealed that chemical fertilizers were essential for high and economic yield levels in tomato farming, but organic fertilizers should also be supplemented to improve tomato fruit quality attributes.

Özet

Çevreyi koruyarak bitkisel üretimi artırmak günümüz tarımının ana hedeflerinden birisidir. Diğer yandan, inorganik ve organik gübrelerin kullanımı giderek artmaktadır. Bu çalışma organik ve inorganik gübrelemenin domatesin (Solanum lycopersicum L., cv. Heinz 1015 F1) verim ve kalite özelliklerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla tarla koşullarında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla domates meyvesinde toplam suda çözülebilir kuru madde, toplam kuru madde, titre edilebilir asitlik, likopen, toplam karotenoid ve C vitamin içerikleri ile verim (pazarlanabilir meyve ve salça verimi) belirlenmiştir. Deneme tesadüf blokları deneme desenine uygun olarak, 3 tekrarlamalı olarak planlanmış ve domates bitkilerine kontrol (gübre uygulanmayan), kimyasal gübre, organik çiftlik gübresi, koyun gübresi, tavuk gübresi, solucan gübresi ve leonardit olmak üzere yedi farklı gübre uygulaması yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, domateste en yüksek pazarlanabilir meyve verimi ve salça verimi kimyasal gübrelemeden elde edilirken, bunu organik gübreler izlemiş ve en düşük verim değerleri kontrol uygulamalarından elde edilmiştir. Organik gübrelerin kullanımı, meyve kalite özelliklerini kimyasal gübrelere göre daha olumlu etkilemiştir. En yüksek meyve likopen, toplam karotenoid ve C vitamin içerikleri organik gübrelerden, özellikle tavuk gübresinden elde edilmiştir. Domates işleme endüstrisi için önemli sayılan meyvede suda çözünebilir katılar ve kuru madde içerikleri bakımından en yüksek değerler tavuk gübresinde bulunmuştur. Leonardit uygulanmış domateslerde titre edilebilir asitlik önemli derecede yüksektir. Diğer taraftan sanayi domateslerinde kalite özellikleri (toplam kuru madde ve titre edilebilir asitlik hariç) en düşük meyveler, gübre uygulanmayan domates bitkilerinden elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları verimli ve ekonomik domates yetiştiriciliği için kimyasal gübrelerin gerekli olduğunu, aynı zamanda domates meyve kalitesini arttırmak için de organik gübrelerin kullanılması gerektiğini göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURHAN, A., ÖZMEN, N. (2021). Effects of Chemical and Organic Fertilizer Treatments on Yield and Quality Traits of Industrial Tomato. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 213–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/366993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adsule, P.G. and A. Dan. 1979. Simplified extraction procedure in the rapid spectrophotometric method for lycopene estimation in tomato. J. Food Sci. Technol. 16:216-218.
  2. Akıllı, M. and E. Cücü. 1996. Organik tarımda sebze yetiştiriciliğinde son gelişmeler. Hasad Dergisi, 11(128): 16-18.
  3. Akinremi, O.O., R.L. Janzen, R.L. Lemke, F.J. Larney. 2000. Response of canola, wheat and green beans to leonardite additions. Can. J. Soil Sci. 80: 437-443. AOAC 1980. Official Methods of Analysis. 13th Ed. Washington, D.C. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Atkinson, N.J., T.P. Dew., C. Orfila, P.E. Urwin. 2011. In¬fluence of combined biotic and abiotic stress on nutritional quality parameters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Jour¬nal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59: 9673–9682.
  4. Barrett, D.M., C. Weakley, J.V. Diaz, M. Watnik. 2007. Qualitative and nutritional differences in processing tomatoes grown under commercial organic and conventional production systems. J. Food Sci. 72(9): 441-451.
  5. Bilalis, D., M. Krokida, I. Roussis, P. Papastylianou, I. Travlos, N. Cheimona, A. Dede. 2018. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on yield and quality of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Folia Hort. 30(2): 321-332.
  6. Bulluck, L.R., and J.B. Ristaino. 2002. Effect of synthetic and organic soil fertility amendments on southern blight, soil microbial communities, and yield of processing tomatoes, Phytopathology, 92: 181–189.
  7. Campos, C.A.B., P.D. Fernandez, H.R. Gheyi, F.F. Blanco, C.B. Gonçalves, S.A.F. Campos. 2006. Yield and fruit quality of industrial tomato under saline irrigation. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.) 63(2): 146-152.
  8. Cemeroğlu, B., Karadeniz, F., Özkan, M., 2003. Meyve ve Sebze işleme Teknolojisi 3. Gıda Teknolojisi Derneği Yayınları No:28, S: 469-502,
  9. Ankara.
  10. Cemeroğlu, B. 2011. Meyve ve Sebze İşleme Teknolojisi 2. Cilt, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Tic. Ltd. Şti. Yayınları, No:191, 636s, Ankara.
  11. Chang, K.H., R.Y. Wu, K.C. Chuang, T.F. Hsieh, R.S. Chung. 2010. Effects of chemical and organic fertilizers on the growth, flower quality and nutrient uptake of Anthurium andreanum, cultivated for cut flower production. Scientia Horticulturae, 125: 434-441.
  12. Chassy, A.W., L. Bui, E.N. Renaud, M. Van Horn, A.E. Mitchell. 2006. Three-year comparison of the content of antioxidant micro constituents and several quality characteristics in organic and conventionally managed tomatoes and bell peppers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54,