SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2019 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging: From A Radiologist’s Point of View with A Focus on Breast Imaging

Levent ÇELİK
Pages
13–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But today, publications about AI in radiology have increased to 700- 800 per year

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the famous topic nowadays in all of the science fields.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Only 10 years ago, the total number of publications on AI in radiology just exceeded 100 per year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But today, publications about AI in radiology have increased to 700- 800 per year
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the famous topic nowadays in all of the science fields. Medical imaging is the most rising area for health innovations of AI. Only 10 years ago, the total number of publications on AI in radiology just exceeded 100 per year. But today, publications about AI in radiology have increased to 700- 800 per year

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, L. (2019). Role of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging: From A Radiologist’s Point of View with A Focus on Breast Imaging. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 13–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/366807

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69–90
  2. Tabár L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, Baldetorp L, Holmberg LH, Gröntoft O, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; 1: 829–32
  3. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 25 (NIPS 2012): 1097–105 4. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184: 613–7
  4. Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson AN, Miglioretti DL, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175: 1828–37
  5. Kooi T, Litjens G, van Ginneken B, Gubern-Mérida A, Sánchez CI, Mann R, et al. Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med Image Anal 2017; 35: 303–12
  6. Trister AD, Buist DSM, Lee CI. Will Machine Learning Tip the Balance in Breast Cancer Screening? JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 1463–1464
  7. Samulski M, Hupse R, Boetes C, Mus RD, den Heeten GJ, Karssemeijer N. Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 2323–30
  8. Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Krupinski E, Mordang JJ, Schilling K, HeywangKöbrunner SH, Sechopoulos I, et al. Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System. Radiology 2019; 290: 305–14
  9. Singh S, Maxwell J, Baker JA, Nicholas JL, Lo JY. Computer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents. Radiology 2011; 258: 73–80
  10. Dalmış MU. Automated Analysis of Breast MRI: from Traditional Methods into Deep Learning. Doctoral Thesis. Radboud University Nijmegen (cited 2019 Sep
  11. Ehteshami Bejnordi B, Veta M, Johannes van Diest P, van Ginneken B, Karssemeijer N, Litjens G, et al. Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer. JAMA 2017; 318: 2199–2210