Journals / TİSK Akademi / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16

Is the growth expectation a self-fulfilling process for Turkey? from the point of Neo-Wicksellian’s view

Türkiye ekonomisi için büyüme beklentisi kendi kendini besleyen bir süreç mi? Neo-Wicksellyen bir bakış açısı

Pages
189–203
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results shows that financial markets; exchange rates and actual growth rate affects the growth expectation of decision makers in the short term, while actual growth rate is the only factor in affecting growth expectation in the long run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The economies dominated by the financial markets, affect the total demand within the framework of the utility function by creating a risk due to change in interest rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results shows that financial markets; exchange rates and actual growth rate affects the growth expectation of decision makers in the short term, while actual growth rate is the only factor in affecting growth expectation in the long run.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, it is not the fi- nancial markets but it is the past experience that effects the growth expectations of economic agents.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The economies dominated by the financial markets, affect the total demand within the framework of the utility function by creating a risk due to change in interest rates. In that case, it brings the question of whether is it the risk in financial markets that affects total demand expectation or is that total demand expectation creates self-fulfilling equilibrium in terms of Neo-Wicksellian analysis. This study aims to answer this question within the framework of the Neo- Wicksellian analysis for Turkey. The results shows that financial markets; exchange rates and actual growth rate affects the growth expectation of decision makers in the short term, while actual growth rate is the only factor in affecting growth expectation in the long run. In other words, it is not the fi- nancial markets but it is the past experience that effects the growth expectations of economic agents.

Özet

Finansal piyasaların egemen olduğu ekonomilerde, faiz oranlarındaki değişim bir risk unsuru yaratarak fayda fonksiyonu çerçevesinde toplam talebi etkilemektedir. Bu ise Neo-Wicksellyen analiz açısından “toplam talep beklentisinin belirleyicisi sadece finansal piyasalardaki risk mi yoksa toplam talep beklentileri kendi kendini besleyen bir denge mi yaratıyor” tartışmasını gün- deme getirmektedir. Bu çalışma Neo-Wicksellyen analiz çerçevesinde bu soruya Türkiye açısından cevap vermeyi hedeflemiştir. Çalışma sonucu karar alıcı iktisadi birimlerin büyüme beklentisini kısa vadede finansal piyasaların, döviz kurunun ve gerçekleşen büyümenin etkilediğini, uzun vad- ede ise büyüme beklentisini etkileyen tek değişkenin gerçekleşen büyüme olduğunu ortaya koy- maktadır. Diğer bir ifade ile iktisadi birimlerin büyüme beklentisini etkileyen temel değişken finansal piyasalar değil, kendi geçmiş deneyimleridir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜSLÜ, B. (2013). Is the growth expectation a self-fulfilling process for Turkey? from the point of Neo-Wicksellian’s view. TİSK Akademi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16, 189–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/366599

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acaravi, A., İ. Öztürk, ve S. K. Acaravi (2007). Fi- nance-Growth Nexus: Evidence From Turkey. Jo- urnal of Finance and Economics. No: 11. ss. 30-40
  2. Adrian, T., E. Moench. ve H.S. Shin (2009). Macro Risk Premium and Intermediary Balance Sheet Quantities. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report. No: 421 Adrian, T. ve H. S. Shin (2011). Financial Interbank and Monetary Economics. Handbooks in Econo- mics. Der: B. Friadman ve M. Woodford. Londo., North-Holland Airaudo, M., R. Cardani, ve J. Lansing, Monetary Policy and Asset Prices with Belief-Driven Fluc- tuations. http://www.be.wvu. edu/econ_seminar/do- cuments/11-12/airaudo.pdf, Erişim Tarihi (22.02.2012).
  3. Azariadis, C. (1981). Self-Fulfiling Porphecies. Jo- urnal of Economic Theory. No: 25. ss. 380-396
  4. Baydur, C.M., B. Süslü (2010). Türkiye Açısından Likidite Tuzağının Tanımlanması ve Çözümlen- mesi. Tisk Akademi. No.5(9). ss.112-135
  5. Bernanke, B. ve M. Gertler (1999). Monetary Po- licy and Asset Volatility. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review. No: 84(4). ss. 17- 52 Bhattacharya, S., C. A. E. Goodhart,, D. Tsomocos, ve A. Vardoulakis. Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis and the Leverage Cycle. Seminars at University of Paris 10. The Toulouse School of Economics-Banque de France Seminar http://www2.lse.ac.uk/ fmg/workingPapers/special- Papers/PDF/SP202.pdf, Erişim Tarihi (28.03.2012).
  6. Bilbiie, F., Limited Asset Markets Participation. Monetary Policy and (Inverted) KeynesianLogic. w w. n u f f i e l d. o x. a c. u k / e c o n o m i c s / papers/2005/w9/LAMP_theory.pdf, Erişim Tarihi (12.03.2012).
  7. Bocutoğlu, E., Hyman P. (2010). Minsky’nin Kon- jonktür Teorisi 2007-2010 Heterodoks Bir Değer- lendirme. Bankacılar. No: 75. ss. 3-33
  8. Boianovskya, M. ve H.M. Trautwein (2006). Wick- sell after Woodford. Journal of the History of Eco- nomic Thought. No: 28(2). ss. 171-185
  9. Buera, F.J., J.P. Kaboski, ve Y. Shin (2010). Finance and Development: A Tale of Two Sectors. NBER Working Paper. No: w14914 Canzoneri, M., R. Cumby, B. Diba, ve D. Lopez-Sa- lido (2008). Monetary Aggregates and Liqquidty ina Neo-Wicksellian Framework. NBER Working Paper. No: w14244 Carlstrom, C.T. ve T.S. Fuerst (1997).
  10. Agency Costs, Net Worth and Business Fluctuations: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis. Ameri- can Economic Review. No: 87. ss. 893-910
  11. Cecchetti, S., H. J.Genberg, ve S. Wadhwani (2000). Asset Prices and Central Bank Policy. International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies. London Champ,