Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 8

Comparison of endothelial function of coronary artery bypass grafts in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: Which graft offers the best?

Pages
657–662
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Deteriorated function of RA grafts in diabetic patients, even worse than SV grafts made evident by this study, encourages the use of no touch technique as the method of SV harvesting and more meticulous imaging of RA before its use as a graft in diabetic patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Diabetes associated endothelial dysfunction, which determines both long and short term graft patency, is not uniform in all coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) grafts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fifteen diabetic and 15 non-diabetic patients were included to the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Deteriorated function of RA grafts in diabetic patients, even worse than SV grafts made evident by this study, encourages the use of no touch technique as the method of SV harvesting and more meticulous imaging of RA before its use as a graft in diabetic patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Diabetes associated endothelial dysfunction, which determines both long and short term graft patency, is not uniform in all coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) grafts. Herein this study, we aimed to investigate the degree of endothelial dysfunction in diabetic radial artery (RA), internal mammarian artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV) grafts in vitro tissue bath system. Methods: This is a prospective experimental study. Fifteen diabetic and 15 non-diabetic patients were included to the study. A total number of 96 graft samples were collected; 16 graft samples for each graft type from both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Arterial grafts were harvested with pedicles and SV grafts were harvested by no touch technique. Vasodilatation response of vascular rings to carbachol, which induces nitric oxide (NO) mediated vasodilatation, was designated as the measure of endothelial function. Results: The IMA grafts had the most prominent NO mediated vasodilatation in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, concluding a better preserved endothelial function than SV and RA. The no- touch SV and RA grafts had similar vasodilatation responses in non-diabetic patients. In diabetic patients, on the other hand, RA grafts exhibited the least vasodilatation response (ie. worst endothelial function), even less vasodilatation than no touch SV grafts (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Deteriorated function of RA grafts in diabetic patients, even worse than SV grafts made evident by this study, encourages the use of no touch technique as the method of SV harvesting and more meticulous imaging of RA before its use as a graft in diabetic patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜR, D. Ö., GÜR, Ö., GÜRKAN, S., CÖMEZ, S., GÖNÜLTAŞ, A., YILMAZ, M. (2015). Comparison of endothelial function of coronary artery bypass grafts in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: Which graft offers the best?. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 8, 657–662. https://ajindex.com/articles/365913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Leavitt BJ, Sheppard L, Maloney C, Clough RA, Braxton JH, Charlesworth DC, et al. Effect of diabetes and associated conditions on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 2004
  3. II41-4. [CrossRef] 3. Ellis SG. Coronary revascularization for patients with diabetes updated data favor coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Alserius T, Hammar N, Nordqvist T, Ivert T. Improved survival after coronary artery bypass grafting has not influenced the mortality disadvantage in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Abad C, Santana C, Diaz J, Feijoo J. Arteriosclerotic histologic evaluation of the internal mammary artery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Jarvis MA, Jarvis CL, Jones PR, Spyt TJ. Reliability of Allen’s test in selection of patients for radial artery harvest. Ann Thorac Surg 2000
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Souza D, Christofferson R, Bomfim V, Filbey D. ‘No-touch’ Technique using saphenous vein harvested with its surrounding tissue for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains an intact endothelium. Scand Cardiovasc J 1999
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Mechoulam R, Fride E, Ben-Shabat S, Meiri U, Horowitz M. Carbachol, an acetylcholine receptor agonist, enhances production in rat aorta of 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, a hypotensive endocannabinoid. Eur J Pharmacol 1998
  9. R1-3. [CrossRef] 9. Flaherty JD, Davidson CJ. Diabetes and coronary revascularization. JAMA 2005
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Barsness GW, Peterson ED, Ohman EM, Nelson CL, DeLong ER, Reves JG, et al. Relationship between diabetes mellitus and longterm survival after coronary bypass and angioplasty. Circulation 1997
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Whang W, Bigger JT Jr for the CABG Patch Trial Investigators and Coordinators. Diabetes and outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: results from the CABG Patch trial database. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Ahanchi SS, Varu VN, Tsihlis ND, Martinez J, Pearce CG, Kapadia MR, et al. Heightened efficiency of nitric oxide-based therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. Am