Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach - An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography

Pages
243–248
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hemostasis was achievedwith manual compression.Conclusion: Left distal radial approach is safe and feasible as a new technique for coronary angiography and interventions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To share our experience with the left distal radial approach for transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By performing theradial puncture in the fossa radialis or the so called anatomical “Snuffbox” we aimed to present the feasibility and complications of this newtechnique.Methods: Left distal radial artery was used as an access site in 54 patients admitted to our clinic for coronary angiography and intervention betweenMay 25th and October 20th 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hemostasis was achievedwith manual compression.Conclusion: Left distal radial approach is safe and feasible as a new technique for coronary angiography and interventions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To share our experience with the left distal radial approach for transradial coronary angiography and interventions. By performing theradial puncture in the fossa radialis or the so called anatomical “Snuffbox” we aimed to present the feasibility and complications of this newtechnique.Methods: Left distal radial artery was used as an access site in 54 patients admitted to our clinic for coronary angiography and intervention betweenMay 25th and October 20th 2017. All of them had pulse in their left distal radial artery. In the laboratory, they had their left arm gently flexedat the shoulder so that the hand was placed over their right groin. The operator stood on the right side of the patient and performed coronaryangiography and interventions. During the hospital stay, demographic features and complications were recorded.Results: Mean age of patients was 59.3 years and 80% were male. We used Judkins 6 French catheters for the procedures. Seventeen patientsadmitted with acute coronary syndrome. They all underwent successful left distal transradial coronary angiography and intervention. Primaryangioplasty was performed in 10 patients. In total, 20 patients had coronary intervention. Left anterior descending artery was the artery requiringmost intervention (11 patients). Two patients experienced brachial spasm requiring crossover to right femoral artery. There were no casesof radial artery occlusion, hematoma, or hand numbness. The radial sheath was removed at procedure termination. Hemostasis was achievedwith manual compression.Conclusion: Left distal radial approach is safe and feasible as a new technique for coronary angiography and interventions.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYDAN, E., ERDEM, M. A. (2018). Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach - An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 243–248. https://ajindex.com/articles/365777

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Joshi SB, Vatsalaswamy P, Bahetee BH. Variation in formation of superficial palmar arches with clinical implications. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: AC06-9. [CrossRef] Loukas M, Holdman D, Holdman S. Anatomical variations of the superficial and deep palmar arches. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2005; 64: 78-83.
  2. McLean KM, Sacks JM, Kuo YR, Wollstein R, Rubin JP, Lee WP. Anatomical landmarks to the superficial and deep palmar arches. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 181-5. [CrossRef] Gupta S, Nathan S. Radial Artery Use and Reuse. Cardiac Interventions Today 2015; 49-56.
  3. Robson AJ, See MS, Ellis H. Applied anatomy of the superficial branch of the radial nerve. Clin Anat 2008; 21: 38-45. [CrossRef] Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ. The tabatière anatomique. Clin Anat 2006; 19: 299-303. [CrossRef] Kaledin AL, Kochanov IN, Podmetin PS, Seletsky SS, Ardeev VN. Distal radial artery in endovascular interventions. Distal radial artery in endovascular interventions (p.) 2017. Unpublished. https:// doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.13406.33600. Shah RM, Patel D, Abbate A, Cowley MJ, Jovin IS. Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: A meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 88: 1027-33. [CrossRef] Doscher W, Viswanathan B, Stein T, Margolis IB. Hemodynamic assessment of the circulation in 200 normal hands. Ann Surg 1983; 198: 776-9. [CrossRef] Cerda A, del Sol M. Anatomical snuffbox and it clinical significance. A literature review. Int J Morphol 2015; 33: 1355-60. [CrossRef] Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). Euro Intervention 2017; 13: 851-7. [CrossRef] Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutane ous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 349-56. [CrossRef] Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1269-75. [CrossRef] Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015;