Journals / E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Telemedicine in Cardiology Outpatient Clinic: First Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Pages
83–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future research comparing other digital health tools is needed to accurately assess its use in cardiological care.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: A pronounced spread of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) all over the world has led to unpredictable overfilling of medical facilities, thus opening the way for the implication of digital health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: TM was used in the cardiology outpatient clinic from April 7th to May 29th, 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future research comparing other digital health tools is needed to accurately assess its use in cardiological care.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: A pronounced spread of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) all over the world has led to unpredictable overfilling of medical facilities, thus opening the way for the implication of digital health. We aimed at assessing firsttime experience of telemedicine (TM) in the cardiology outpatient clinic of a tertiary medical center during the pandemic. Materials and Methods: TM was used in the cardiology outpatient clinic from April 7th to May 29th, 2020. All the patients that had applied to TM were included in the study. TM was performed by phone calls. The data written by the cardiologist telecommunicating with the patients were recorded by accessing each patient’s electronic file. Assessment of TM in terms of efficacy and patient satisfaction was made in August 2020 by recalling all the patients by phone. Results: A total of 140 patients had TM visit on the appointment day. The population was older (69±13.75) with a male predominance (53.5%). Main complaints were chest pain and high blood pressure. Twenty patients had their medical drugs rearranged. Forty-two patients were invited for face-to-face cardiac evaluation. One of them was hospitalized due to heart failure. Almost all (93.6%) were very satisfied and preferred TM instead of face-to-face outpatient clinic service in terms of easy complaint expression and easy understanding of medication rearrangement (53.6%). They stated that TM was efficient in the prevention of unnecessary hospital visits and it should continue after the pandemic as well. Conclusion: TM is a potential alternative for continuing healthcare delivery to most of the cardiac patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research comparing other digital health tools is needed to accurately assess its use in cardiological care.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYDAN, E., KAYIKÇIOĞLU, M., ZOGHİ, M. (2021). Telemedicine in Cardiology Outpatient Clinic: First Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic. E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 83–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/408942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Kaushik A, Patel S, Dubey K. Digital cardiovascular care in COVID-19 pandemic: A potential alternative? J Card Surg 2020;35:3545-50
  2. Aktoz M, Altay H, Aslanger E, et al. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Uzlaşı Raporu: COVID-19 Pandemisi ve Kardiyovasküler Hastalıklar Konusunda Bilinmesi Gerekenler (25 Mart 2020) [Consensus Report from Turkish Society of Cardiology: COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Diseases. What cardiologists should know. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2020;48(Suppl 1):1-48
  3. Du RH, Liang LR, Yang CQ, et al. Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study. Eur Respir J 2020;55:2000524
  4. Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Solomon SD, Vardeny O. Potential Effects of Coronaviruses on the Cardiovascular System: A Review. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:831-40
  5. WHO Guideline: recommendations on digital ınterventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/digitalinterventions- health-system-strengthening/en/ 6. Seferovic PM, Ponikowski P, Anker SD, et al. Clinical practice update on heart failure 2019: pharmacotherapy, procedures, devices and patient management. An expert consensus meeting report of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2019;21:1169-86
  6. Koehler F, Koehler K, Deckwart O, et al. Telemedical Interventional Management in Heart Failure II (TIM-HF2), a randomised, controlled trial investigating the impact of telemedicine on unplanned cardiovascular hospitalisations and mortality in heart failure patients: study design and description of the intervention. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:1485-93
  7. Kumar P, Huda F, Basu S. Telemedicine in the COVID-19 era: the new normal. Eur Surg 2020:1-2
  8. WHO Global Observatory for eHealth. (2010). Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth [Internet]. World Health Organization. Available at: https://apps. who.int/iris/handle/10665/44497 10. Polinski JM, Barker T, Gagliano N, Sussman A, Brennan TA, Shrank WH. Patients’ Satisfaction with and Preference for Telehealth Visits. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:269-75
  9. Milani RV, Lavie CJ, Bober RM, Milani AR, Ventura HO. Improving Hypertension Control and Patient Engagement Using Digital Tools. Am J Med 2017;130:14-20
  10. Barazzoni R, Bischoff SC, Breda J, et al. ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for