Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5

Authorship: From Credit to Accountability Reflections From the Editors´ Network

Pages
281–286
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review discusses the implicationsof this paradigm shift on authorship requirements with the aim of increasing awareness on good scientific and editorial practices. (Anatol JCardiol 2019; 21: 281-6)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Editors´ Network of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) provides a dynamic forum for editorial discussions and endorses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to improve the scientific quality of biomedical journals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Authorship confers credit and important academic rewards.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review discusses the implicationsof this paradigm shift on authorship requirements with the aim of increasing awareness on good scientific and editorial practices. (Anatol JCardiol 2019; 21: 281-6)
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The Editors´ Network of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) provides a dynamic forum for editorial discussions and endorses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to improve the scientific quality of biomedical journals. Authorship confers credit and important academic rewards. Recently, however, the ICMJE emphasized that authorship also requires responsibility andaccountability. These issues are now covered by the new (fourth) criterion for authorship. Authors should agree to be accountable and ensurethat questions regarding the accuracy and integrity of the entire work will be appropriately addressed. This review discusses the implicationsof this paradigm shift on authorship requirements with the aim of increasing awareness on good scientific and editorial practices. (Anatol JCardiol 2019; 21: 281-6)

🔖

Cite This Article

ALFONSO, F., ZELVEIAN, P., MONSUEZ, J. J., ASCHERMANN, M., BOEHM, M., HERNANDEZ, A. B., WANG, T. D., COHEN, A., IZETBEGOVIC, S., DOUBELL, A., ECHEVERRI, D., ENÇ, N., GONZALEZ, I. F., UNDAS, A., FORTMÜLLER, U., GATZOV, P., GINGHINA, C., GONCALV, L. (2019). Authorship: From Credit to Accountability Reflections From the Editors´ Network. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5, 281–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/365770

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. The International Committee of Medical Journals Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Available: http://www.icmje. org/recommendations 2. Lüscher TF. The codex of science: honesty, precision, and truth-and its violations. Eur Heart J 2013
  2. Alfonso F, Ambrosio G, Pinto FJ, Ector H, Vardas P, Kulakowski P, Timmis A
  3. Editors' Network ESC Task Force. European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals: the 'Editors' Network'. Eur Heart J 2010
  4. Mills P, Timmis A, Huber K, Ector H, Lancellotti P, Masic I, Ivanusa M, Antoniades L, Aschermann M, Laucevicius A, Mustonen P, Artigou JY, Vardas P, Stefanadis C, Chiarello M, Bolognese L, Ambrosio G, van der Wall EE, Kułakowski P, Pinto FJ, Apetrei E, Oganov RG, Kamensky G, Lüscher TF, Lerch R, Haouala H, Sansoy V, Shumakov V, Tajer CD, Lau CP, Márquez M, Krittayaphong R, Arai K, Alfonso F. The role of European national journals in education. Heart 2009
  5. e3. 5. Alfonso F, Timmis A, Pinto FJ, Ambrosio G, Ector H, Kulakowski P, Vardas P
  6. Editors' Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force. Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Journals. Eur Heart J 2012
  7. Alfonso F, Data Sharing. Editors' Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force
  8. Editors' Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force. Eur Heart J 2017
  9. Council of Science Editors. White Paper on Publication Ethics. CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update Available: http://www.CouncilScienceEditors.org. 8. World Association of Medical Editors. WAME Professionalism Code of Conduct The new WAME Professionalism Code of Conduct for medical journal editors. Available: http://www.wame.org. 9. Committee On Publication Ethics. COPE. Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Available: http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines. 10. Stephenson J. ICMJE: All authors of medical Journal articles have “responsibility to stand by the integrity of the entire work”. JAMA 2013
  10. No author listed. The Lancet. Authorship and accountability. Lancet 2013
  11. Goodman NW. Survey of fulfillment of criteria for authorship in published medical research. BMJ 1994
  12. Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, graft