Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Prevalence of Tobacco Use in University Public Employees and Evaluation of Their Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors on This Subject

Pages
58–67
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The frequency of narghile use was 11.1%, hand-rolled tobacco use 7.0%, cigar use 6.1%, pipe use1.5%, and chewing tobacco use 0.4%.Conclusion: The fact that the frequency of using tobacco and cigarette is 32.1% and the cigarette smokingrate is 26.6% among the university public employees in our study reveals that tobacco and cigarette use is stilla great problem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors related to tobacco and cigarette smoking status,knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of public employees of the Selçuk University.Methods: This study was planned to determine the frequency of use of tobacco and its products and the attitudes and behaviors of 458 public employees of the Selçuk University between 2017 and 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A questionnaire consisting of 39 questions including the factors affecting the use/cessation status of tobacco and itsproducts and the knowledge, attitudes, and opinions of the public employees of the university was applied.Results: The mean age of the 458 people studied was 39.21±10.26; of them, 64.6% were males and 35.4% werefemales.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The frequency of narghile use was 11.1%, hand-rolled tobacco use 7.0%, cigar use 6.1%, pipe use1.5%, and chewing tobacco use 0.4%.Conclusion: The fact that the frequency of using tobacco and cigarette is 32.1% and the cigarette smokingrate is 26.6% among the university public employees in our study reveals that tobacco and cigarette use is stilla great problem.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors related to tobacco and cigarette smoking status,knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of public employees of the Selçuk University.Methods: This study was planned to determine the frequency of use of tobacco and its products and the attitudes and behaviors of 458 public employees of the Selçuk University between 2017 and 2018. A questionnaire consisting of 39 questions including the factors affecting the use/cessation status of tobacco and itsproducts and the knowledge, attitudes, and opinions of the public employees of the university was applied.Results: The mean age of the 458 people studied was 39.21±10.26; of them, 64.6% were males and 35.4% werefemales. In general, the frequency of using tobacco and smoking was 32.1%. Among the university public employees, the frequency of tobacco and cigarette smoking status of medical faculty teaching staff and researchstaff was 23.2% and that of medical faculty nurses and other health staff was 38.0%. Tobacco and cigarettesmoking in males (38.2%) was statistically significantly higher than in females (21.0%) (p=0.000). The smokingrate was 26.6% and the smoking prevalence among medical faculty members (17.9%) was lower comparedto those of other health professionals (35.4%) and academic staff (26.0%) (p=0.053). Among the universityemployees, the smoking rate in males (33.1%) was statistically significantly higher than in females (14.8%)(p=0.000). The frequency of narghile use was 11.1%, hand-rolled tobacco use 7.0%, cigar use 6.1%, pipe use1.5%, and chewing tobacco use 0.4%.Conclusion: The fact that the frequency of using tobacco and cigarette is 32.1% and the cigarette smokingrate is 26.6% among the university public employees in our study reveals that tobacco and cigarette use is stilla great problem.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARAKOĞLU, K., ÜNAL, G. Ü. (2019). Prevalence of Tobacco Use in University Public Employees and Evaluation of Their Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors on This Subject. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 58–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/365075

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), 2012 Turkey 2012. Turkish Public Health Institution. Available at: https://www.who. int/tobacco/surveillance/survey/gats/report_tur_2012.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2019
  2. WHO Report On The Global Tobacco Epidemic (MPOWER), 2008, WHO, Geneva. Available at: https://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/2013/en/. Accessed June 27, 2019
  3. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic: Warning about the Dangers of Tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Available at: http://www.ssuk.org. tr. Accessed June 27, 2019
  4. Bilir N, Çakır B, Dağlı E, Ergüder T, Önder Z. Tobacco Control in Turkey. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/ pdf_file/0004/98446/E93038.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2019
  5. Gunay T, Pekel O, Simsek H, Sahan C, Soysal A, Kilinc O, et al. Smoking habits and cessation success. What differs among adults and elderly? Saudi Med J 2014;35:585–91
  6. Ministry of Health. Turkey: PIAR Research, Smoking Prevalence among People Over 15. Ankara: 1998
  7. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), 2012 Turkey 2008. Turkish Public Health Institution. Available at: http://www.halksagligiens.hacettepe.edu.tr/english/GATS_english.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2019
  8. WHO Tobacco Control, 2015 World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2015. Available at: htpp://www.who. int/whosis/whostat/2015/en/index.html. Accessed June 27, 2019
  9. Education at a Glance 2015. Available at: http://download.eiie.org/Docs/WebDepot/EaG2015_EN.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2019
  10. Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V. Biyoistatistik. 17st edition. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Yayınları; 2016
  11. Prochaska JO, Goldstein MG. Process of smoking cessation. Implications for clinicians. Clin Chest Med 1991;12:727–35
  12. Prochaska JO, Di Clemente Ce. Stages and Process of Self Change of Smoking: toward an integrated model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1983;51:390–5
  13. Fagerstrom KO, Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT. Nicotine addiction and its assessment. Ear Nose Throat J 1990;69:763–5
  14. Uysal MA, Kadakal F, Karşidağ C, Bayram NG, Uysal O, Yilmaz V. Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: reliability in a Turkish sample and factor analysis. Tuberk Toraks 2004;52:115–21
  15. Altın R, Kart L, Ünalacak M, Dutkun Y, Örnek T. Prevalence of Smoking and Evaluation of Attitudes Towards Smoking in Medical Faculty Hospital. Kocatepe Medical Journal 2004;5:63–7
  16. Yang T, Yu L, Bottorff JL, Wu D, Jiang S, Peng S, et al. Global