Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Levels of Serum IgE and Rectal Mucosal Eosinophilia in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Pages
73–77
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, IgE levels were found high in 7 (19.45%) of IBS-C subgroup, 7 (36.84%) of IBS-Dsubgroup and 3 (33.33%) of IBS-M group (p=0.348).Conclusion: In this study, relation between serum IgE and rectal eosinophilia levels with IBS subgroups couldnot not found.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and food allergic reactions are common in the community and cancause symptoms similar to each other.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it is aimed to evaluate serum immunglobulin E (IgE) andrectum mucosal eosinophilia levels in IBS.Methods: Record of patients who applied between April 2013 and April 2014 were retrospectively screenedand patients who were 18–70 years old and previously performed rectal biopsy by colonoscopy and diagnosed with IBS according to Rome III criteria were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, IgE levels were found high in 7 (19.45%) of IBS-C subgroup, 7 (36.84%) of IBS-Dsubgroup and 3 (33.33%) of IBS-M group (p=0.348).Conclusion: In this study, relation between serum IgE and rectal eosinophilia levels with IBS subgroups couldnot not found.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and food allergic reactions are common in the community and cancause symptoms similar to each other. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate serum immunglobulin E (IgE) andrectum mucosal eosinophilia levels in IBS.Methods: Record of patients who applied between April 2013 and April 2014 were retrospectively screenedand patients who were 18–70 years old and previously performed rectal biopsy by colonoscopy and diagnosed with IBS according to Rome III criteria were included in the study. All patients were grouped as diarrhealdominant IBS (IBS-D), constipation dominant IBS (IBS-C), mix type IBS (IBS-M) and unclassified IBS (IBS-U) according to their symptoms. In addition, serum IgE levels and rectal mucosal eosinophilia levels were evaluatedfrom all patients' records.Results: 39 (56.52%) of total 69 patients with IBS were in the IBS-C group, 19 (27.54%) of them were in theIBS-D, 9 (13.04%) of them were in the IBS-M and 2 (2.90%) of them were in the IBS-U. There were not anysignificant differences between IBS subgroups in terms of presence of allergic disease and presence of foodallergy (p=0.519 and p=0.849, respectively). The median level of rectal eosinophilia in IBS subgroups was foundto be 2.00 (0.00 to 88.00) in IBS-C subgroup, 5.00 (0.00–100.00) in IBS-D subgroup and 2.00 (0.00 to 11.00) inIBS-M subgroup. In addition, IgE levels were found high in 7 (19.45%) of IBS-C subgroup, 7 (36.84%) of IBS-Dsubgroup and 3 (33.33%) of IBS-M group (p=0.348).Conclusion: In this study, relation between serum IgE and rectal eosinophilia levels with IBS subgroups couldnot not found.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKUŞ, E. E., TÜZÜN, S., BAŞAK, K., EPÖZTÜRK, K., SAYINER, M., DABAK, M. R. (2019). Evaluation of Levels of Serum IgE and Rectal Mucosal Eosinophilia in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 73–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/365035

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Yao X, Yang YS, Cui LH, Zhao KB, Zhang ZH, Peng LH, et al. Subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome on Rome III criteria: a multicenter study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;27(4):760–5
  2. Barbara G, De Giorgio R, Stanghellini V, Cremon C, Salvioli B, Corinaldesi R. New pathophysiological mechanisms in irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20 Suppl 2:1–9
  3. Eswaran S, Tack J, Chey WD. Food: the forgotten factor in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2011;40(1):141–62
  4. Crespo JF, Rodriguez J. Food allergy in adulthood. Allergy 2003;58(2):98–113
  5. Uz E, Türkay C. İrritabl barsak sendromunda gıda alerjisi. Güncel Gastroenter Derg 2006;10(1):38–44
  6. Dainese R, Galliani EA, De Lazzari F, Di Leo V, Naccarato R. Discrepancies between reported food intolerance and sensitization test findings in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94(7):1892–7
  7. Petitpierre M, Gumowski P, Girard JP. Irritable bowel syndrome and hypersensitivity to food. Ann Allergy 1985;54(6):538–40
  8. Bischoff SC, Mayer J, Wedemeyer J, Meier PN, Zeck-Kapp G, Wedi B, et al. Colonoscopic allergen provocation (COLAP): a new diagnostic approach for gastrointestinal food allergy. Gut 1997;40(6):745–53
  9. Shanahan F, Whorwell PJ. IgG-mediated food intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome: a real phenomenon or an epiphenomenom? Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100(7):1558–9
  10. Agréus L, Svärdsudd K, Nyrén O, Tibblin G. Irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia in the general population: overlap and lackof stability over time. Gastroenterology 1995;109(3):671– 80
  11. Nanda R, James R, Smith H, Dudley CR, Jewell DP. Food intolerance and the irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 1989;30(8):1099– 104
  12. Sampson HA. Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;113(5):805–19
  13. Simrén M, Månsson A, Langkilde AM, Svedlund J, Abrahamsson H, Bengtsson U, et al. Food-related gastrointestinal symptoms in the irritable bowel syndrome. Digestion 2001;63(2):108–15
  14. Park MI, Camilleri M. Is there a role of food allergy in irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia? A systematic review. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2006;18(8):595–607
  15. Isolauri E, Rautava S, Kalliomäki M. Food allergy in irritable bowel syndrome: new facts and old fallacies. Gut 2004;53(10):1391–3
  16. Barau E, Dupont C. Modifications of intestinal permeability during food provocation procedures in pediatric irritable bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1990;11(1):72– 7.