SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

The Investigation of the Effects of the Very and Mild Preterm Birth on the Musculoskeletal System

Hayriye KUL KARAALİ
Sema SAVCI
Ayşe ÖZDEN
Celal GENÇOĞLU
NURAY DUMAN
Pages
205–210
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This situation suggests that very and MP born children later on may havepotential health problems originated from musculoskeletal system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of study was to examine the musculoskeletal system of the very preterm (VP) and mildpreterm (MP) born children and to compare them with their term born peers.Methods: Children born with VP and MP between January 1998 and April 2003, whose contact informationwas available from patient records, were included in our study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Skeletal muscle mass, fat freemass, posture and physical fitness of all participants were assessed.Results: Eighteen (28.2%) VP, 23 (35.9%) MP and 23 (35.9%) term born children were included in this study.Total posture score was 6.0 [3.5] in the VP group, 5.0 [5.0] in the MP group and 4.0 [2.0] in the term group andthe difference between VP and term group was significant (p=0.004).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This situation suggests that very and MP born children later on may havepotential health problems originated from musculoskeletal system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of study was to examine the musculoskeletal system of the very preterm (VP) and mildpreterm (MP) born children and to compare them with their term born peers.Methods: Children born with VP and MP between January 1998 and April 2003, whose contact informationwas available from patient records, were included in our study. The control group consisted of volunteers whowere admitted to the Department of Child Health and Diseases during the study. Skeletal muscle mass, fat freemass, posture and physical fitness of all participants were assessed.Results: Eighteen (28.2%) VP, 23 (35.9%) MP and 23 (35.9%) term born children were included in this study.Total posture score was 6.0 [3.5] in the VP group, 5.0 [5.0] in the MP group and 4.0 [2.0] in the term group andthe difference between VP and term group was significant (p=0.004). Munich Physical Fitness Test score was44.0±6.3 in the VP group, 45.6±4.8 in the MP group and 51.9±3.8 in the term group and the difference betweenVP and term groups and between MP and term groups was significant (p=0.001 and p=0.001, respectively).Conclusion: The musculoskeletal system of the VP and MP born school age children is affected negativelyin comparison to their term peers. This situation suggests that very and MP born children later on may havepotential health problems originated from musculoskeletal system.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAALİ, H. K., SAVCI, S., ÖZDEN, A., GENÇOĞLU, C., DUMAN, N. (2020). The Investigation of the Effects of the Very and Mild Preterm Birth on the Musculoskeletal System. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 205–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/364995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Adult outcome of extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics 2010;126(2):34251
  2. Gäddlin PO. Follow-up studies of very low birthweight children in Sweden. Acta Paediatr 2011;100(7):94049
  3. Gibson AM, Doyle LW. Respiratory outcomes for the tiniest or most immature in-fants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;19(2):10511
  4. Kajantie E, Strang-Karlsson S, Hovi P, Räikkönen K, Pesonen AK, Heinonen K, et al. Adults born at very low birth weight exercise less than their peers born at term. J Pediatr 2010;157(4):61016
  5. Vrijlandt EJ, Gerritsen J, Boezen HM, Grevink RG, Duivermen AJ. Lung function and exercise capacity in young adults born prematurely. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173(8):8906
  6. Moutquin JM. Classification and heterogeneity of preterm birth. BJOG 2003;110(20):303
  7. Lim JS, Hwang JS, Lee JA, Kim DH, Park KD, Jeong JS, et al. Cross-calibration of mul-ti-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with eight-point tactile electrodes and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in healthy children aged 6-18 years. Pediatr Int 2009;51(2):2638
  8. Corbin CB. Concepts of fitness and wellness. Boston: McGrawHill; 2004
  9. Gruber W, Orenstein DM, Braumann KM, Hu G. Health-Related Fitness and Traina-bility in Children With Cystic Fibrosis. Pediatric Pulmonology 2008;43(10):95364
  10. Munich Physical Fitness Test Manual. (transferred on April 5, 2010). Available from: URL: http://www.sportunterricht.de/ mft/mft.pdf. Assessed November 10, 2020
  11. Bracewell MA, Hennessy EM, Wolke D, Marlow N. The EPICure study: growth and blood pressure at 6 years of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93(2):10814
  12. Chan GM, Armstrong C, Moyer-Mileur L, Hoff C. Growth and bone mineralization in children born prematurely. J Perinatol 2008;28(9):61923
  13. Doyle LW, Faber B, Callanan C, Ford GW, Davis NM. Extremely low birth weight and body size in early adulthood. Arch Dis Child 2004;89(4):34750
  14. Hack M, Schluchter M, Andreias L, Margevicius S, Taylor HG, Drotar D, et al. Change in prevalence of chronic conditions between childhood and adolescence among ex-tremely lowbirth-weight children. JAMA 2011;306(4):394401
  15. Hack M, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Rahman M, Cutter L, Borawski E. Growth of very low birth weight infants to age 20 years. Pediatrics 2003;112(1):308
  16. Euser AM, Finken MJ, Keijzer-Veen MG, Hille ET, Wit JM, Dekker FW. Dutch POPS-9 Collaborative Study Group. Ass