Journals / The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Nomophobia and Smartphone Addiction Levels among University Students in terms of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk

Pages
159–164
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All health institutions should take necessary protective measures to minimize and eliminate such addictions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study examines the relationship between nomophobia and smartphone addiction, which have not become increasingly prevalent, and other addictions, especially drug abuse.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study included Hacettepe University students aged 18 years and above between June 2020 and August 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All health institutions should take necessary protective measures to minimize and eliminate such addictions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study examines the relationship between nomophobia and smartphone addiction, which have not become increasingly prevalent, and other addictions, especially drug abuse. Methods: This study included Hacettepe University students aged 18 years and above between June 2020 and August 2020. The questionnaire used in this study consisted of questions about socio-demographical char- acteristics in the first part and the Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q), Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS), Alcohol Risk Screening Scale (ARSS) and Drug Use Risk Screening Scale (DRSS) in the second part. Results: The study included 386 university students and 195 (50.5%) were men. The median of NMP-Q, SAS, ARSS, and DRSS were 78.0 (20.0-140.0), 35.0 (10.0-60.0), 6.0 (0.0-12.0), 0.0 (0.0-2.0), respectively. No signifi- cant difference in the nomophobia score was found between the alcohol and drug addiction risk scale scores (p=0.545 and p=0.186, respectively). Also, no significant difference in the smartphone addiction score was found between the alcohol and drug addiction risk scale scores (p=0.520 and p=0.945, respectively). There was a weak negative relationship between nomophobia scores and age (p=0.046). Conclusion: Given the increased tendency to follow technological developments among university students, their incapability to stay away from smartphones and similar devices due to smartphone addiction is an indica- tor of the student’s addiction. This may predispose them to other accompanying addictions such as alcoholism and drug abuse. However, many different factors may cause this. All health institutions should take necessary protective measures to minimize and eliminate such addictions.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİDANCI, İ., AKSOY, H., BAŞER, D. A., TACİ, D. Y., CANKURTARAN, M. (2021). Evaluation of Nomophobia and Smartphone Addiction Levels among University Students in terms of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk. The anatolian journal of family medicine (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 159–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/364981

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adnan M, Gezgin D. Modern Çağın Yeni Fobisi: Üniversite Öğrencileri Arasında Nomofobi Prevalansı. Ankara Üniversi- tesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 2016;49(1):158–41
  2. Kaplan Akilli G, Gezgin D. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Nomofobi Düzeyleri ile Farklı Davranış Örüntülerinin Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2016;1(40):51–69
  3. King ALS, Valença AM, Silva ACO, Baczynski T, Carvalho MR, Nar- di AE. Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? Computers in Human Behavior 2013;29:140–4
  4. Noyan CO, Enez Darçın A, Nurmedov S, Yılmaz O, Dilbaz N. Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı Ölçeğinin Kısa Formunun Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. An- adolu Psikiyatr Derg 2015;16:71–83
  5. Park N, Lee H. Social Implications of Smartphone Use: Korean College Students’ Smartphone Use and Psychological Well- Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2012;15:491–7
  6. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Currentconcepts in validity and reliabil- ity for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. Am J Med 2006;119:7–16
  7. Griffiths MD. A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use 2005;10:191–7
  8. Wu AM, Cheung VI, Ku L, Hung EP. Psychological risk factors of addiction to social networking sites among Chinese smart- phone users. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2013;2:160–6
  9. Alaçam H, Korkmaz A, Efe M, Şengül C, Şengül C. Pamuk- kale Üniversitesi öğrencilerinde alkol ve sigara bağımlılığı taraması. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi 2015;8(2):87–2
  10. Yildirim, C, Correia AP. Exploring the dimensions of nomopho- bia: Development and validation of a self-reported question- naire. Computers in Human Behavior 2015; 49:130–7
  11. Yildirim, C, Sumuer E, Adnan M, Yildirim S. A growingfear: Prevalence of nomophobia among Turkish college students. Information Development 2015;32(5):1322–31
  12. Türen U, Erdem H, Kalkın G. Mobil Telefon Yoksunluğu Korku- su (Nomofobi) Yayılımı: Türkiye’den Üniversite Öğrencileri ve Kamu Çalışanları Örneklemi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 2017;10(1):1–12
  13. Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for ado- lescents. PloS One 2013;8:e83558
  14. Ögel K, Koç C, Görücü S.Study on development, validity and reliability of a risk-screening questionnaire for alcohol and drug use. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2017;