Journals / TİSK Akademi / 2008 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 6

Sector-Specific Analysis of Unemployment Hysteresis in Turkey with Structural Break and Long Memory Modeling

Türkiye'de İşsizlik Histerisinin Yapısal Kırılma ve Güçlü Hafıza Modellemesi ile Sektörel Analizi

Pages
66–87
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This can be interpreted as although a strong growth has disappeared the hysteresis effect in the manufacturing and finance sectors after the 2001 crisis, the rise in technology-based production, jobless growth and self-service banking resulted in hysteresis effect in the sectors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to hysteresis effect increasing rate of unemployment rates, after the economic crisis does not turn back to its average value, on the contrary.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It gets the much higher rate of equilibrium point the Turkish economy has been experienced the problem of continuously increasing unemployment for the last 30 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This can be interpreted as although a strong growth has disappeared the hysteresis effect in the manufacturing and finance sectors after the 2001 crisis, the rise in technology-based production, jobless growth and self-service banking resulted in hysteresis effect in the sectors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

According to hysteresis effect increasing rate of unemployment rates, after the economic crisis does not turn back to its average value, on the contrary. It gets the much higher rate of equilibrium point the Turkish economy has been experienced the problem of continuously increasing unemployment for the last 30 years. Following the 1994 and 2001 crisis in Turkey, an increase in unemployment rates has been observed. After the crisis, non-decrease in unemployment rate is called hysteresis despite the growing economy. The differences in sector-specific increase unemployment rates, afterwards the crisis, have emerged the idea of investigating the sector-specific hysteresis. Meanwhile, since structural break leads spurious long memory, structural break based adjusted unemployment rates were used. As a result, hysteresis influence has only found in Manufacturing Industry and Financial Institutes sectors. This can be interpreted as although a strong growth has disappeared the hysteresis effect in the manufacturing and finance sectors after the 2001 crisis, the rise in technology-based production, jobless growth and self-service banking resulted in hysteresis effect in the sectors.

Özet

Histeri etkisine göre ekonomik krizlerden sonra yükselen işsizlik oranları kendi ortalama değerine geri dönmemekte ve aksine artarak daha yüksek bir oranda denge noktası oluşturmaktadır. Türkiye ekonomisi son otuz yıldır sürekli artan işsizlik sorunu yaşamaktadır. 1994 ve 2001 krizlerinin ardından işsizlik oranlarında sıçramalar gerçekleşmiştir. Türkiye ekonomisi kriz sonrasında sektörel bazda farklı oranlarda büyümesine rağmen, işsizlik rakamlarında istenen azalmanın gerçekleşmemesi sektörel bazda histerinin araştırılmasını gerektirmiştir. Bu amaçla, çalışmada yapısal kırılma testleri ve güçlü hafıza modelleri ile sektörel bazda histeri etkisinin varlığı araştırılmıştır. Sonuçta yalnızca İmalat Sanayi ve Mali Kurumlar sektörlerinde histeri etkisinin varlığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu, Türkiye ekonomisinin 2001 sonrasında kesintisiz büyümesinin İmalat Sanayi ve Mali Kurumlar sektörleri dı- şında histeri etkisini ortadan kaldırırken, imalat sektöründe teknoloji yoğun malların üretimi ve istihdam yaratmayan büyümenin, bankacılık sektöründeki şubesiz bankacılığın histeri etkisini devam ettirdiğ i şeklinde yorumlanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARIŞIK, S., ÇEVİK, E. İ. (2008). Sector-Specific Analysis of Unemployment Hysteresis in Turkey with Structural Break and Long Memory Modeling. TİSK Akademi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 6, 66–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/364687

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Agiakoglu, C.; P. Newbold ve M. Wohar (1993), “Bias in an Estimator of the Fractional Difference Parameter”, Journal of Time Series Analysis (14): 235-246.
  2. Bai, J. ve Pierre Perron (1998), “Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes”, Econometrica (66): 47-78.
  3. Bai, Jushan ve Pierre Perron (2003), “Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models”, Journal of Applied Econometrics (18): 1-22.
  4. Barışık, Salih ve Emrah İsmail Çevik (2007a), “Türkiye'de İşsizlikte Histeri Etkisinin Parçalı Durağanlık Testi İle Analizi”, 8. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu, 24-25 Mayıs 2007,
  5. Malatya Barışık, Salih ve Emrah İsmail Çevik (2007b), “Yapısal Kırılma Testleri ile Türkiye'de İşsizlik Histerinin Analizi: 1923-2006 Dönemi”, Yayınlanmamış eser. Barkoulas, John T. ve F. Christopher Baum (1997), “Long Memory and Forecasting in Euroyen Deposit Rates”, http://fmwww.bc. edu/ec-p/WP361.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2007.
  6. Blanchard, Oliver Jean (1991), “Wage Bargaining and Unemployment Persistence”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (23): 277-292.
  7. Camero, Mariam, Carrion-i-Silvestre Josep Luis ve Tamarit Cecilio (2005), “Unemployment Dynamic and NAIRU Estimates for CEECs: A Univariate Approach”, http://www.ub.edu/ere/documents/papers/ 131.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2007.
  8. Chang, Tsangyao, Kuei-Chiu Lee, Chien Chung Neih ve Ching-Chun Wei (2005), “An Empirical Note on Testing Hysteresis in Unemployment for Ten European Countries: Panel SURADF Approach”, Applied Economics Letters (12): 881-886.
  9. Choi, Kyongwook ve Eric Zivot (2007), “Long Memory and Structural Changes in The Forward Discount: An Emprical Investigation”, Journal Of International Money And Finance (26): 342-363.
  10. Cobham, David ve Steve Williams (1998), “Hysteresis, the Phillips Curve and the Cost of Monetary Union”, Applied Economics Letters (5): 477-480.
  11. Crato, Nuno ve Philip Rothman (1996), “Measuring Hysteresis in Unemployment Rates with Long Memory Models”, Http://Core. Ecu.Edu/Econ/Rothmanp/Urlm01.Pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2007
  12. Cross, Rod (1990), “Unemployment, Hysteresis and the Natural Rate Hypothesis”, Reviewed: J. Luis Guasch, Journal of Economic Literature (28): 107-108.
  13. Dejong, D. N.; J. C. Nankervis; N. E. Savin ve C. H. Whiteman (1992), “Integration versus Trend Stationarity in the Time Series”, Econometrica (60): 423-433.
  14. Diebold, F. X. ve G. D. Rudebusch (1989), “Long Memory and Persistence in Aggregate Output”, Journal of Monetary Economics (24): 189-209. D