Journals / TİSK Akademi / 2015 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20

How Effective is Financial System to Reduce Income Inequality? A Regional Panel Data Analysis for Turkish Economy

Gelir Eşitsizliğini Azaltmada Finansal Sistem Ne Kadar Etkin? Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Bölgesel Panel Veri Analizi

Pages
286–316
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it can clearly be said that the divergence process between the rich and the poor is valid in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although neoliberal theory asserts that income inequality would be offset from higher to lower income groups, the experiences of the real world have shown that most of the population in countries have failed to reach benefits from economic and financial growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between financial development and income inequality by using panel data analysis for 12 sub-regions in the preiod of 2006-2012 in Turkish economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it can clearly be said that the divergence process between the rich and the poor is valid in Turkey.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although neoliberal theory asserts that income inequality would be offset from higher to lower income groups, the experiences of the real world have shown that most of the population in countries have failed to reach benefits from economic and financial growth. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between financial development and income inequality by using panel data analysis for 12 sub-regions in the preiod of 2006-2012 in Turkish economy. The estimation results point out that the financial development process raises the incomes of the rich, but not for that of the poor. Besides, some control variables are included in the regression models to verify the estimation results and the findings show that financial development accelerates the income inequality. Consequently, it can clearly be said that the divergence process between the rich and the poor is valid in Turkey.

Özet

Neoliberal teori; gelir eşitsizliklerinin, yüksek gelir gruplarından düşük gelir gruplarına doğru telafi edilebileceğini öne sürmesine rağmen, gerçek dünya deneyimleri nüfusun büyük bir kısmının ekonomik ve finansal büyümenin faydalarına ulaşmakta başarısız olduğunu göstermiştir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye ekonomisinde 12 alt-bölge itibariyle finansal kalkınma ve gelir eşitsizliği arasındaki ilişkileri 2006-2012 dönemi için panel veri analizlerini kullanarak incelemektir. Tahmin sonuçları, finansal kalkınma sürecinin zengin sınıfın gelir düzeyini artırdığını, ancak benzer sürecin yoksul sınıfın gelir düzeyi için geçerli olmadığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca, tahmin sonuçlarını teyit edebilmek amacıyla bazı kontrol değişkenleri de regresyon modellerine dahil edilmiş ve bulgular, finansal kalkınmanın gelir eşitsizliklerini hızlandırdığını ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak, Türkiyede zengin ve yoksul sınıf arasında ıraksama sürecinin geçerli olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKINCI, M., AKINCI, G. Y., YILMAZ, Ö. (2015). How Effective is Financial System to Reduce Income Inequality? A Regional Panel Data Analysis for Turkish Economy. TİSK Akademi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20, 286–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/364686

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Aghion, P. ve Bolton, P. (1997). A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development. The Review of Economic Studies. 64(2), 151-172.
  2. Banerjee, A. V. (2001).
  3. Contracting Constrains, Credit Markets and Economic Development. MIT Department of Economics Working Paper. No: 02-17.
  4. Banerjee, A. V. ve Newman, A. F. (1993). Occupational Choice and the Process of Development. Journal of Political Economy. 101(2), 274-298.
  5. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A. ve Levine, R. (2004).
  6. Finance, Inequality and Poverty: Cross-Country Evidence. NBER Working Paper. No: 10979. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A. ve Levine, R. (2007).
  7. Finance, Inequality and the Poor. Journal of Economic Growth. 12(1), 27-49.
  8. Bittencourt, M. (2010). Financial Development and Inequality: Brazil 1985-1994. Economic Change and Restructuring. 43(2), 113-130.
  9. Chandavarkar, A. (1992). Of Finance and Development: Neglected and Unsettled Questions. World Development. 20, 133-142.
  10. Charemza, W. W. ve Deadman, D. F. (1993). New Directions in Econometric Practice. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Clarke, C. R. G., Xu, L. C. ve Zou, H. (2006). Finance and Income Inequality: What Do the Data Tell Us?. Southern Economic Journal. 72(3), 578-596.
  11. Çınar, S. (2010). OECD Ülkelerinde Kişi Başına GSYİH Durağan Mı? Panel Veri Analizi. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. 29(2), 591-601.
  12. Enowbi-Batuo, M., Guidi, F. ve Mlambo, K. (2010). Financial Development and Income Inequality: Evidence from African Countries. MPRA Working Paper. No: 25658. Fry, M. J. (1978). Money and Capital or Financial Deepening in Economic Development?. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 10, 464-475.
  13. Fry, M. J. (1995).
  14. Money, Interest and Banking in Economic Development. Second Edition. London: John Hopkins University Press.
  15. Galor, O. ve Zeira, J. (1993). Income Distribution and Macroeconomics. The Review of Economic Studies. 60(1), 35-52.
  16. Galor, O. ve Moav, O. (2004). From Physical to Human Capital: Inequality and the Process of Development. The Review of Economic Studies. 71(4), 1001-1026.
  17. Gimet, C. ve Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2011). A Closer Look at Financial Development and Income Distribution. Journal of Banking & Finance. 35(7), 1698-1713.
  18. Goldsmith, R. (1969). Financial Structure and Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  19. Granger, C. W. J. (1964). Spectral Analysisof Economic Time Series. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  20. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica. 37(3), 4