Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2008 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

The effects of different doses of intranasal midazolam in premedication in children

Çocuklarda premedikasyon amaçlı farklı dozlarda kullanılan intranazal midazolamın etkileri

Pages
7–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We conclude that; 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam is an effective and safe dosage when conscious sedation was aimed for premedication in pre-school children and higher doses are not necessary.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Midazolam is a benzodiazepine and frequently preferred as a premedicant agent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study design: After the approval of Ethics Committee of Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital and informed consent of the parents, 60 patients aged 2-6 years in ASA I-II physical status randomized into three groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We conclude that; 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam is an effective and safe dosage when conscious sedation was aimed for premedication in pre-school children and higher doses are not necessary.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Premedikasyon · Midazolam · İlaç uygulama

Abstract

Objective: Midazolam is a benzodiazepine and frequently preferred as a premedicant agent. Nasal application of the drugs has important advantages as; rapid absorbtion and rapid onset caused by rapid absorbtion of the drug to the systemic circulation. In our study; we aimed to compare the effects of different doses of intranasal midazolam on sedation and parental seperation when used for premedication in pre-scholl children. Study design: After the approval of Ethics Committee of Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital and informed consent of the parents, 60 patients aged 2-6 years in ASA I-II physical status randomized into three groups. Premedication was produced with intranasal midazolam with 0.3 mg/kg in Group I, 0.4 mg/kg in Group II and 0.5 mg/kg in Group III. Sedation and parental seperation scores and adverse effects were recorded as study parameters. Results: Sedation scores were similar between the three groups (p>0.05). Sedation scores were significantly lower in 25. and 30. minutes compared to 10. min in all three groups (p<0.05). Parental seperation scores were similar between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that; 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam is an effective and safe dosage when conscious sedation was aimed for premedication in pre-school children and higher doses are not necessary.

Özet

Amaç: Midazolam; premedikasyonda sıklıkla tercih edilen benzodiazepin grubundan bir ajandır. Nazal ilaç uygulamalarında hızlı emilim, ilacın direk sistemik dolaşıma geçmesiyle etkinin çabuk ortaya çıkması önemli avantajlardır. Çalışmamızda; okul öncesi çağı çocuklarında, premedikasyon amacıyla uygulanan intranazal midazolamın farklı dozlarının ebeveynden ayrılma ve sedasyon düzeyi üzerine etkilerini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntem: Şişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Etik Kurulu izni ve ebeveynlerin onayları ile, 2-6 yaşları arasında, ASA I-II grubundan 60 olgu randomize olarak 3 gruba ayrıldı. Premedikasyon Grup I’de 0.3 mg/kg, Grup II’de 0.4 mg/kg, Grup III’de 0.5 mg/kg midazolamın intranazal uygulanmasıyla gerçekleştirildi. Sedasyon ve ebeveynden ayrılma skoru ile yan etkiler çalışma parametreleri olarak kaydedildi. Bulgular: Sedasyon skoru gruplar arasında benzerdi (p>0.05). Grup içi karşılaştırmada sedasyon skoru 10.dk.ya göre her üç grupta 25. ve 30.dk.larda düşük bulundu (p 0.05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda; okul öncesi çağı çocuklarında premedikasyon amacıyla 0.3 mg/kg intranazal midazolam dozunun etkin ve güvenli olduğu, bilinçli sedasyon amaçlandığında daha yüksek dozların gerekli olmadığı sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜMÜŞ, M., SİVRİKAYA, G. U., BEKTAŞ, M., HANCI, A. (2008). The effects of different doses of intranasal midazolam in premedication in children. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 7–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/363969

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lichtor JL: Psyhological preperation and preoperative medication. In: Miller RD, (ed). Anaesthesia, New York, USA, Churchill Livingstone Inc, 1990, 895-923
  2. Feld LH, Negus JB, White PF: Oral midazolam preanesthetic medication in pediatric outpatients. Anesthesiology, 73: 831-4, 1990
  3. Saint-Maurice C, Meistelman C, Rey E, et al: The pharmacokinetics of rectal midazolam for premedication in children. Anesthesiology, 65: 536-8, 1986
  4. Karl HW, Rosenberger JL, Larach MG, Ruffle JM: Transmucosal administration of midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients. Comparison of the nasal and sublingual routes. Anesthesiology, 78: 885-91, 1993
  5. Walbergh EJ, Wills RJ, Eckhert J: Plasma concentrations of midazolam in children following intranasal administration. Anesthesiology, 74: 233-5, 1991
  6. Rey E, Delaunay L, Pons G, et al: Pharmacokinetics of midazolam in children: comparative study of intranasal and intravenous administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 41: 355-7, 1991
  7. Lammers CR, Rosner JL, Crockett DE, Chhokra R, Brock-Utne JG: Oral midazolam with an antacid may increase the speed of onset of sedation in children prior to general anaesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth, 12: 26-8, 2002
  8. Alderson PJ, Lerman J: Oral premedication for paediatric ambulatory anaesthesia: a comparison of midazolam and ketamine. Can J Anaesth, 41: 221-6, 1994
  9. Malinovsky JM, Lejus C, Servin F, et al: Plasma concentrations of midazolam after i.v., nasal or rectal administration in children. Br J Anaesth, 70: 617-20, 1993
  10. Önçağ Ö, Ayanoğlu M, Eronat C: Pedodontide sedasyon amacıyla midazolam kullanımı. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği fakültesi Dergisi 19: 132-8, 1998
  11. Haas DA: Oral and inhalation conscious sedation. Dent Clin North Am, 43: 341-59, 1999. Review
  12. Kunt N, Kafalı H, Özbaş G, Gürsoy S, Mimaroğlu C: Pediatrik hastalarda intranazal premedikasyon için kullanılan midazolam ve ketamin HCl’nin etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. C.U. Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 18: 269-72, 1996
  13. Cakmak SA, Hancı A, Sivrikaya GU, Eksioglu B, Basgul A: Çocuklarda premedikasyonda rektal ketamin, alfentanil ve diyazepam etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması. Anestezi Dergisi 10; 198-202, 2002
  14. Hartgraves PM, Primosch RE: An evaluation of oral and nasal midazolam for pediatric dental sedation. ASDC J Dent Child, 61: 175-81, 1994. Review
  15. Vivarelli R, Zanotti F, Battaglia D, et al: Premedication with intranasal midazolam in children of various ages. Minerva Anestesiol, 64: 499-504,