SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2005 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4

The comparison of tumor size, metastasis of axillary lymph nodes, pericapsular invasion, perineural invasion and lymphatic invasion in breast cancer with invasive ductal carcinoma

Memenin invaziv duktal karsinomlarında tümör boyutu, aksiller lenf bezi tutulumu, perikapsüler yayılım, perinöral invazyon ve vasküler invazyonlarının birbirleriyle karşılaştırılması

Canan TANIK
Serap GÖZEL
Damlanur SAKIZ
Nedim POLAT
Fevziye KABUKÇUOĞLU
Öznur AKSAKAL
H. Orhan KIZILKAYA
Pages
36–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results and Conclusion: There was significant statistical relation between tumor size and metastasis of axillary lymph nodes, the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes and pericapsular invasion, perineural invasion and lymphatic invasion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to compare prognostic parameters of breast cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study Design:In this study 78 patients, with age variation between 35 - 83 years, to whom modified radical mastectomy was applied were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results and Conclusion: There was significant statistical relation between tumor size and metastasis of axillary lymph nodes, the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes and pericapsular invasion, perineural invasion and lymphatic invasion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Meme neoplazmları · Lenf düğümleri · Mastektomi

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare prognostic parameters of breast cancer. Study Design:In this study 78 patients, with age variation between 35 - 83 years, to whom modified radical mastectomy was applied were examined. Pathologic diagnosis of these patients was invasive ductal carcinoma. The tumor size, status of axillary nodes, pericapsular invasion, perineural invasion and vascular lymphatic invasion were reexamined. In statistical analysis of the data, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney u tests were used. Results and Conclusion: There was significant statistical relation between tumor size and metastasis of axillary lymph nodes, the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes and pericapsular invasion, perineural invasion and lymphatic invasion.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada; meme kanserinde belirlediğimiz prognoslik parametreler birbirleri ile karşılaştırılarak aralarındaki ilişki değerlendirildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza, yaşlan 35 -83 arasında değişen modifiye radikal mastektomi uygulanmış, patolojik tanıları invaziv duktal karsinom olan 78 hasta dahil edildi. Olgular, tümör boyutu, aksiler lenf bezi durumu, perikapsüler yayılım, perinöral invazyon ve vasküler invazyon acısından tekrar değerlendirildi. Verilerin istatistiksel analizinde, Kruskal Wallis ve Mann Whitney u testleri kullanıldı. Bulgular ve Sonuç: Tümör boyutu ve aksiller lenf bezi metastazı, metastatik aksiller lenf bezi sayısı ve perikapsüler yayılım arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki saptandı. Perinöral invazyon mevcut olgularda vasküler invazyon daha sık olarak görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANIK, C., GÖZEL, S., SAKIZ, D., POLAT, N., KABUKÇUOĞLU, F., AKSAKAL, Ö., KIZILKAYA, H. O. (2005). The comparison of tumor size, metastasis of axillary lymph nodes, pericapsular invasion, perineural invasion and lymphatic invasion in breast cancer with invasive ductal carcinoma. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4, 36–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/363911

References (4)

  1. Tavassoli F:Prognostic indicators.Pathology of the Bre­ ast,Second edition,Appleton and Lange,Connecti­cut, 1999,37-51 Kister SJ,Sommers SC.Reevaluation of blood vessel in­ vasion and lymphocytic infiltrates in breast carsinoma.Cancer,19:12L3-1216, 1966. Danforth D,Lichter AS:The diagnosis of breast can cer. İn:Diagnosis and management of breast cancer.Philadelphia,WB Saunders, 1988,50-94. Wilson RE,Donegan WL,Metlin C et al:The 1982 nati­ onal survey of carcinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obstet,159:309-318, 1984. Nemoto T et al.Survery of the American College of Surgeons,Cancer 51:1333-1338,1983 Koscielny S et al.Breast cancer Relationship between the size of the primary tumor and the probability of metastatic dissemination.Br J Cancer 49:709-715
  2. 1984 Fisher B et al.Ten year follow up results of patients with carsinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obst 140:528- 534
  3. Carter CL,Allen C,Henson DE:Relation of tumor si ze.lymph node status and survival in 24740 breast cancer cases.Cancer, 63:1309-1317, 1989. Page DL.Prognosis and breast cancer.Recognition of let­ hal and favorable prognostic types.Am J Surg Pathol 22:1232-1239, 1991. Haagensen CD.Diseases of breast,3rd ed.Philadelp­ hia, WB Saunders, 1986,656 Roger V,Beito.GJolly PC:Factors affecting the incidence of lymph node metastases in small cancers of the bre ast.Am J Surg,157:501-507, 1989. Barth A,Craigh PH,Silverstein MJ:Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with Tl breast carci noma.Cancer, 79:1918-1922, 1997. Lee AKC et al.Lymphatic and blood vessel invasion.Re­ lationship with recurrence and survivalin a large study.Histopathology 24:41-47
  4. 1994 Clemente CG,Boracchi P,Andreola S:Peritumoral lymphatic invasion in patients with node negative mam­ mary duct carcinoma.Çancer, 69:1396-1403, 1992. McGuire WL.Prognostic factors in primary breast can cer.Cancer Surv,5:527-536, 1986. Bell JR,Friedell GH.Goldenberg IS.Prognostic significan­ ce of pathologic findings in human breast carsino ma.Surg.Gynecol.Obstet,129:258-262, 1969. Rosen PP,Saigo PE,Braun DW.Predictors of recurrence in stage I breast cancer.Ann Surg, 193:15-25, 1981. Orbo A,Stalsberg H,Kunde D.Topographic criteria in the diagnosis of tumor emboli in intramammary lymphatics.Cancer,66:972-977, 1990.