Our experiences of regional anaesthesia in urologic surgery

Key Findings & Data:Despite a trend toward the use of regional anaesthesia,w e evaluated our regional anesthesia frequences and preferences in anesthesia practice of urologic surgery.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Our range of regional anaesthesia was 37. 5 % in between 2000-2004 and the most preferable type of regional anaesthesia was spinal anaesthesia

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2000-2004 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Geriyedönük çalışma · Ürolojik cerrahi prosedürler · Anestezi

Abstract

We aimed of evaluating current anesthetic practice and regional anesthesia enthusiasm. Despite a trend toward the use of regional anaesthesia,w e evaluated our regional anesthesia frequences and preferences in anesthesia practice of urologic surgery. Our range of regional anaesthesia was 37. 5 % in between 2000-2004 and the most preferable type of regional anaesthesia was spinal anaesthesia

Özet

anesteziye ilgimizi araştırmayı amaçladık. Rejyonel anestezi kullanımına ilginin giderek artmasına rağmen ürolojik cerrahide rejyonel anestezi tercih sıklığımızı ve seçilen rejyonel anestezi tiplerini değerlendirdik. 2000-2004 arasında rejyonel anestezi oranımız % 37. 5 ve en sık tercih edilen rejyonel anestezi tipi spinal anestezi idi.

Keywords

Geriyedönük çalışma Ürolojik cerrahi prosedürler Anestezi blok Retrospective Studies Urologic Surgical Procedures Anesthesia Conduction

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞGÜL, A., HANCI, A., ATALAN, G. (2006). Our experiences of regional anaesthesia in urologic surgery. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 35–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/363903

References (1)

Va. Peduto.P. Chevallier, A. Casati. A multicenter survey on anaesthesia practice in Italy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2004;70:473-91 2. F. Clergue.Y. Auroy.R Pequignet,et all. French survey of anesthesia in 1996. Anestrfesiology 1999;91:1509-20 3. N. Seo,Y. Kawashima, K. Irita,et all. Annual report of perioperative mortality and morbidity fort he year 2000 at certified training hospitals of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists:with a special reference to anesthetic methods. Report of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating RRoom Safety. Masui 2002;51:542-556 4. Holmstrom B, Rawal N, Arner S. The use of central regional anesthesia techniques in Sweden: results of a nation-wide survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 May;41(5):565-72. 5. Grau T, Fatehi S, Motsch J, Bartusseck E. Survey on current practice of regional anaesthesia in Germany, Austria,and Switzerland. Part 2: Use, success rates and techniques. Anaesthesist. 2004 Sep;53(9):847-55.