Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

European Standard Series Patch Test Results in Contact Dermatitis Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Pages
206–210
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Legalregulations should be made to decrease exposure to allergens.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Sensitization of allergens varies among societies and also it is influenced by various factors, such as age and gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to evaluate the patch test results in patients with contact dermatitis (CD)in our center.Methods: European standard series patch test results of patients with CD between 2017 and 2018 were evaluated retrospectively.Results: Of the 135 patients, 65 (48.1%) were males, 70 (51.9%) were females.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Legalregulations should be made to decrease exposure to allergens.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Sensitization of allergens varies among societies and also it is influenced by various factors, such as age and gender. Itmay even change over the years. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the patch test results in patients with contact dermatitis (CD)in our center.Methods: European standard series patch test results of patients with CD between 2017 and 2018 were evaluated retrospectively.Results: Of the 135 patients, 65 (48.1%) were males, 70 (51.9%) were females. The mean age of patients was 41.43±14.26 (11-78)years. In 78 (57.8%) patients, a positive reaction against at least one allergen was detected. The most common allergens were nickelsulfate (27.4%), potassium dichromate (14.8%), cobalt chloride (11.9%), textile dye mix (8.1%), fragrance mix i, ii (6.7%) and balsamof Peru (4.4%). The sensitization of nickel sulfate was higher in females and sensitization of cobalt chloride and potassium dichromatein males (p=0.03, 0.05, 0.03, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, age was independently related to apositive reaction against at least one allergen.Conclusion: Nickel sulfate, potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride and textile dye mix were the most common allergens. Legalregulations should be made to decrease exposure to allergens.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACER, E., ERDOĞAN, H. K., BATAN, T., SARAÇOĞLU, Z. N. (2020). European Standard Series Patch Test Results in Contact Dermatitis Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 206–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/363674

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Rashid RS, Shim TN. Contact dermatitis. BMJ 2016;353:i3299
  2. Tan CH, Rasool S, Johnston GA. Contact dermatitis: allergic and irritant. Clin Dermatol 2014;32:116–24
  3. Milam EC, Cohen DE. Contact Dermatitis: Emerging Trends. Dermatol Clin 2019;37:21–8
  4. Vigneshkarthik N, Ganguly S, Kuruvila S. Patch Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hand Eczema. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:WC04–7
  5. Boonchai W, Iamtharachai P. Risk factors for common contact allergens and patch test results using a modified European baseline series in patients tested during between 2000 and 2009 at Siriraj Hospital. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2014;32:60–5
  6. Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis 2015;73:195–221
  7. ESSCA Writing Group. The European Surveillance System of Contact Allergies (ESSCA): results of patch testing the standard series, 2004. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:174–81
  8. Machovcova A, Dastychova E, Kostalova D, Vojtechovska A, Reslova J, Smejkalova D, et al. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:162–6
  9. Lam WS, Chan LY, Ho SC, Chong LY, So WH, Wong TW. A retrospective study of 2585 patients patch tested with the European standard series in Hong Kong (1995-99). Int J Dermatol 2008;47:128– 33
  10. Lazarov A. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:73–6
  11. Bilcha KD, Ayele A, Shibeshi D, Lovell C. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia-results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series. Contact Dermatitis 2010;63:140–5
  12. Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Ozkaya-Bayazit E. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:17–23
  13. Ertam I, Turkmen M, Alper S. Patch-test results of an academic department in Izmir, Turkey. Dermatitis 2008;19:213–5
  14. Akyol A, Boyvat A, Peksari Y, Gürgey E. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:333–7
  15. Ada S, Aşkın Akbaş Ü, Güleç AT, Seçkin D. Patch test results of 775 patients with allergic contact dermatitis. Turkderm 2010;44:187– 92
  16. Uçar S, Özçelik S,