In order to solve these problems,it is necessary to register and report these problems and take the necessary preventive measures.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the technical problems in pediatric laparoscopic surgery and to evaluate its results.Methods: The technical problems encountered in 30 laparoscopic operations performed between 3 November 2012 and 31 December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.Results: The technical problems experienced in 30 laparoscopic surgeries were analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were 6 splenectomies, 15 appendectomies, 1 hernioplasty, 2 ovarian cyst excisions, 4 cholecystectomies, 1 intra-abdominal exploration of the testes, and 1varicocele surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to solve these problems,it is necessary to register and report these problems and take the necessary preventive measures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Özet
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the technical problems in pediatric laparoscopic surgery and to evaluate its results.Methods: The technical problems encountered in 30 laparoscopic operations performed between 3 November 2012 and 31 December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.Results: The technical problems experienced in 30 laparoscopic surgeries were analyzed. There were 6 splenectomies, 15 appendectomies, 1 hernioplasty, 2 ovarian cyst excisions, 4 cholecystectomies, 1 intra-abdominal exploration of the testes, and 1varicocele surgery. The technical errors included instrument failure in 10, human errors in 8, device problems in 12, and multipleproblems in 2 cases. In 5 patients, we switched to open surgery.Conclusion: Technical problems prolong the operation, and cause a conversion to open surgery. In order to solve these problems,it is necessary to register and report these problems and take the necessary preventive measures.
🔖
Cite This Article
KUZDAN, M. Ö., ALİM, R., KARAASLAN, B., ÇELEBİ, S., SEYİTHAN, Ö. (2019). The Effect of Technical Problems on the Operation Process in Pediatric Laparoscopy. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2, 110–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/363439
Kuzdan MÖ, Karadağ Ç, Dokucu Aİ, Bülbül A. Laparoscopic splenectomy by vessel sealing system: experience in a serie of 25 cases. Medical Journal of Bakırköy 2010;6:763–7
Janu PG, Rogers DA, Lobe TE. A comparison of laparoscopic and traditional open splenectomy in childhood. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:109–13. 3. den Boer KT, de Jong T, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ. Problems with laparoscopic instruments: opinions of experts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11:149–55
Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Hoffmann WF, van der Elst M, Dankelman J. Can a structured checklist prevent problems with laparoscopic equipment? Surg Endosc 2008;22:2238–43
Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK, Chang A, Darzi AW. Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement. Ann Surg 2004;239:475–82
Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery-a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 1998;29:409–14
Sarker SK, Chang A, Vincent C, Darzi AW. Technical skills errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by expert surgeons. Surg Endosc 2005;19:832–5
Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Analysis of errors in laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 2004;18:592–5
Tang B, Hanna GB, Bax NM, Cuschieri A. Analysis of technical surgical errors during initial experience of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy by a group of Dutch pediatric surgeons. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1716–20
Park AE, Birgisson G, Mastrangelo MJ, Marcaccio MJ, Witzke DB. Laparoscopic splenectomy: outcomes and lessons learned from over 200 cases. Surgery 2000;128:660–7
Esposito C, Schaarschmidt K, Settimi A, Montupet P. Experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:309–11
Buzink SN, van Lier L, de Hingh IH, Jakimowicz JJ. Risk-sensitive events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the influence of the integrated operating room and a preoperative checklist tool. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1990–5.