Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3

Effects of Cow’s Milk Components, Goat’s Milk and Sheep’s Milk Sensitivities on Clinical Findings, and Tolerance Development in Cow’s Milk Allergy

Pages
391–397
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

High CM-sIgE, CAS-sIgE, SM-sIgE, and GMsIgE levels are associated with respiratory symptoms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cow’s milk (CM) contains some proteins capable of causing an allergic reaction in a sensitized individual and one of the most common causes of food allergy in childhood.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Most of the patients will develop tolerance by the age of 3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:High CM-sIgE, CAS-sIgE, SM-sIgE, and GMsIgE levels are associated with respiratory symptoms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Cow’s milk (CM) contains some proteins capable of causing an allergic reaction in a sensitized individual and one of the most common causes of food allergy in childhood. Most of the patients will develop tolerance by the age of 3. In this study, we aimed to evaluate sensitivity to CM allergen components as well as goat’s milk (GM) and sheep’s milk (SM) cross reactions in cow’s milk allergic (CMA) patients and to figure out the risk factors for tolerance non-development. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including 66 patients for IgE-mediated CMA with mean age of 38 months. We evaluated the patients in two groups: Group 1 (n=50): Patients who have no tolerance in oral food challenge test; Group 2 (n= 16): Patients who were found tolerant to CM after elimination diet. CM-sIgE, α-lactalbumin (ALA)-sIgE, β-Lactoglobulin (BLG)-sIgE, casein (CAS)-sIgE, GM-sIgE, and SM-sIgE, skin prick tests with CM and GM, and eosinophils in peripheral blood were all compared between two groups. Results: In the whole group, GM-sIgE and SM-sIgE were positive in 84.8% and ALA-sIgE, BLG-sIgE, and CAS-sIgE were positive in, respectively, 69.7%, 62.7%, and 77.3% of the patients. Two groups were similar in terms of age at onset and diagnosis, gender, median elimination period, total IgE levels, CM-sIgE, and eosinophilia (p>0.05). Mean wheal diameters of CM and GM in SPT (p<0.001), GM-sIgE (p=0.03), and SM-sIgE (p=0.01) were significantly higher in Group 1. There was a positive correlation between CM-sIgE and total IgE (p=0.001), eosinophilia percentage (p=0.04), CM wheal diameter in SPT (p=0.001), CAS-sIgE (p<0.001), GM-sIgE (p<0.001), and SM-sIgE (p<0.001) in Group 1. Patients with respiratory symptoms and history of anaphylaxis had higher CM-SPT, CM-sIgE, CAS-sIgE, GM-sIgE, and SM-sIgE (p<0.05) levels. Gastrointestinal and skin symptoms showed no relation with laboratory findings. Tolerance was not developed in any patient with a history of anaphylaxis. Conclusions: As with CM-sIgE levels and high induration diameters in SPT, high CAS-sIgE, SM-sIgE, and GM-sIgE levels are also risk factors for persistence of CMA; anaphylaxis, as a first reaction, may also be a risk factor. High CM-sIgE, CAS-sIgE, SM-sIgE, and GMsIgE levels are associated with respiratory symptoms.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAYDIN, N. C., SEVERCAN, E. U., AKARCAN, S. E., BAL, C. M., GÜLEN, F., TANAÇ, R., DEMİR, E. (2021). Effects of Cow’s Milk Components, Goat’s Milk and Sheep’s Milk Sensitivities on Clinical Findings, and Tolerance Development in Cow’s Milk Allergy. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3, 391–397. https://ajindex.com/articles/363373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ruszczyński M, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Cow’s milk allergy guidelines: a quality appraisal with the AGREE II instrument. Clin Exp Allergy 2016
  2. 1236–41. [CrossRef] 2. Patel BY, Volcheck GW. Food Allergy: Common Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2015
  3. 1411–9. [CrossRef] 3. Burks AW, Tang M, Sicherer S, Muraro A, Eigenmann PA, Ebisawa M, et al. ICON: food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012
  4. 906– 20. [CrossRef] 4. Sánchez-García S, Cipriani F, Ricci G. Food Allergy in childhood: phenotypes, prevention and treatment. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2015
  5. 711–20. [CrossRef] 5. Saarinen KM, Pelkonen AS, Mäkelä MJ, Savilahti E. Clinical course and prognosis of cow’s milk allergy are dependent on milk-specific IgE status. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005
  6. 869–75. [CrossRef] 6. Fiocchi A, Brozek J, Schünemann H, Bahna SL, von Berg A, Beyer K, et al. World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow’s Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines. World Allergy Organ J 2010
  7. 57–161. [CrossRef] 7. Carrard A, Rizzuti D, Sokollik C. Update on food allergy. Allergy 2015
  8. 1511–20. [CrossRef] 8. Wal JM. Cow’s milk proteins/allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2002
  9. 3–10. [CrossRef] 9. Restani P, Gaiaschi A, Plebani A, Beretta B, Cavagni G, Fiocchi A, et al. Cross-reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species. Clin Exp Allergy 1999
  10. 997–1004. [CrossRef] 10. Shokouhi Shoormasti R, Fazlollahi MR, Barzegar S, Teymourpour P, Yazdanyar Z, Lebaschi Z, et al. The most common cow’s milk allergenic proteins with respect to allergic symptoms in Iranian patients. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2016
  11. 161–5. 11. Chatchatee P, Järvinen KM, Bardina L, Vila L, Beyer K, Sampson HA. Identification of IgE and IgG binding epitopes on beta- and kappa-casein in cow’s milk allergic patients. Clin Exp Allergy 2001
  12. 1256–62. [CrossRef] 12. Vila L, Beyer K, Järvinen KM, Chatchatee P, Bardina L, Sampson HA. Role of conformational and linear epitopes in the achievement of tolerance in cow’s milk allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2001
  13. 1599–606. [CrossRef] 13. Järvinen KM, Chatchatee P. Mammalian milk allergy: clinical suspicion, cross-reactivities and diagnosis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2009
  14. 251–8. [CrossRef] 14. Sicherer SH. Clinical implications of cross-reactive food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001
  15. 881–90. [CrossRef] 15. Turnbull JL, Adams HN, Gorard DA. Review article: the diagnosis and management of food a