Journals / Tarihin Peşinde Uluslararası Tarih ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 18

THE CULT REFORM BY TUTHALIYA IV

IV. TUTHALİYA’NIN KÜLT REFORMU

Pages
43–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our study analyzes the reasons of the cult reform made by Tuthaliya IV by taking account of archeological remains and cuneiform sources.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The period of Tuthaliya IV, who is one of the kings lived in the days of the Hittite Empire, is the era that we can refer to most easily when compared to other periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is known that there are numerous cult texts which are dated in the period of Tuthaliya IV.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our study analyzes the reasons of the cult reform made by Tuthaliya IV by taking account of archeological remains and cuneiform sources.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The period of Tuthaliya IV, who is one of the kings lived in the days of the Hittite Empire, is the era that we can refer to most easily when compared to other periods. It is known that there are numerous cult texts which are dated in the period of Tuthaliya IV. It is also known that the cult texts created in the early days of the Empire had been copied during the period of Tuthaliya IV. Today, the suggestion brought forward in review of the cuneiform sources that Tuthaliya IV had made a cult reform is argued among scientists. When looking at the issue from an archeological point of view, what catches the attention is that Tuthaliya IV had been the father of many works that we could evaluate under the title of religion. Our study analyzes the reasons of the cult reform made by Tuthaliya IV by taking account of archeological remains and cuneiform sources.

Özet

Hitit İmparatorluk devri krallarından IV. Tuthaliya, Hitit kralları arasında yazılı kaynaklar açısından en iyi takip edebildiğimiz dönemdir. IV. Tuthaliya dönemine tarihlenen çok sayıda kült metninin bulunduğu bilinmektedir. Ayrıca imparatorluğun erken dönemlerine ait kült metinlerinin IV. Tuthaliya döneminde kopyalarının yapıldığı bilinmektedir. Çivi yazılı kaynaklarına bakılarak IV. Tuthaliya’nın bir kült reformu gerçekleştirdiği günümüzde bilim insanları arasında tartışılmaktadır. Arkeolojik açıdan bakıldığında ise IV. Tuthaliya’nın din başlığı altında değerlendirebileceğimiz pek çok eserin banisi olduğu dikkati çekmektedir. Çalışmamızda arkeolojik kalıntılar ve çivi yazılı kaynaklar değerlendirilerek IV. Tuthaliya’nın kült reformu gerçekleştirmesinin sebepleri tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, A. (2018). THE CULT REFORM BY TUTHALIYA IV. Tarihin Peşinde Uluslararası Tarih ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 18, 43–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/363023

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alexander, 1986:
  2. R. Alexander, TheSculptureandSculptors of Yazılıkaya, London‐ Toronto. Beran, 1962: Th. Beran, “DasFelsheiligtumvonYazilikaya. DeutungundDatie‐ rung”, ZeitschriftfürKulturaustausch 12, 146‐152. Bittel vd., 1975: K. Bittel‐J. Boessneck‐B. Damm‐H. G. Güterbock‐h. Haupt‐ mann‐R. Bryce, 1986: “TheBoundaries of HattiandHittiteBorderPolicy”, Tel Aviv 13‐14/1, 85‐102. Bryce, 2003: T. Bryce, “History”, TheLuwians, Handbuch der OrientalistikI/68, Melchert, H. C. (ed. ), Leiden& Boston, 27‐124. Collins, 2006: B. J. Collins, “A Note on someLocalCults in the Time of Tudhali‐ ya IV”, The Life and Times of Hattušili III andTuthaliya IV. Proceedings of A SymposiumHeld in Honour of J. De Roos, 12‐13 December 2003, Leiden, van den Hout, Th. P. J. (ed. ), Leiden, 39‐48. Darga, 1992:
  3. A. M. Darga, Hitit Sanatı, İstanbul. de Roos, 2002: Johan de Roos, “Vowsconcerningmilitarycampaigns of Hat‐ tušiliandTuthaliaš IV”, Anatolia antica. Studi in memoriadiFiorellaImparati, Eot‐ hen 11, Tomo I, de Martino, S. ‐F. P. Daddi (ed. ), Firenze, 181‐188. Ehringhaus, 2005:
  4. H. Ehringhaus, Götter, Herrscher, Inschriften. DieFelsreliefs der HethitischenGrossreichszeit in der Türkei, Mainz am Rhein. Goetze, 1957:
  5. A. Goetze, Kleinasien, München. Hawkins, 1995:
  6. J. D. Hawkins, TheHieroglyphicinscription of thesacredpoolcomplex at Hattusa (SÜDBURG). With an archaeologicalintroductionbyNeve P.,Studienzu den Boğazköy‐TextenBeiheft 3, Wiesbaden. Hawkins, 2006: J. D. Hawkins, “TudhaliyatheHunter”, The Life and Times of Hattušili III andTuthaliya IV. Proceedings of A SymposiumHeld in Honour of J. De Roos, 12‐13 December 2003 Leiden, van den Hout, Th. P. J. (ed. ), Leiden, 49‐76. Hazenbos, 2003:
  7. J. Hazenbos, TheOrganization of theAnatolianLocalKultsDu‐ ringtheThirteenth Century B. C. An appraisal of theHittitecultinventories, Cunei‐ formMonographs 21, Leiden‐Boston. Klengel, 1999:
  8. H. Klengel, GeschichtedesHethitischenReiches, Handbuch der Ori‐ entalistik, Leiden. Kohlmeyer, 1995:
  9. K. Kohlmeyer, AnatolianArchitecturalDecorations, Statuary, andStelae, Civilizations of the Ancient Near East, Sasson, J. C. (ed. ), New York, 2639‐2660. Masson, 1979: EmiliaMasson, “LesInscriptionsLouvitesHiéroglyphiqu‐ esd’Emirgazi”, Journaldessavants N° 1, 3‐52. McMahon, 1989: G. McMahon, “TheHistory of theHitties”, TheBiblicalArchaeolo‐ gist52‐2/3, Reflections of a LateBronze Age Empire: TheHittites, 62‐77. McMahon, 1991:
  10. G. McMahon, TheHittiteStateCult of theTutelaryDeities, Chicago. Mellaart, 1974: James M