Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

The Role of Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis Score in Acute Appendicitis in Children

Pages
192–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results ofpathology, n=48 patients for the AA group and n=54 patients for the non-AA group were identified.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the condition that most commonly requires a surgical procedure in children presenting to the emergencydepartment with acute abdominal pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Alvarado and PAS scores in the diagnosis of AA in children.Materials and Methods: One hundred and two patients aged 3-17 years, who were admitted to the pediatric emergency department with acuteabdominal pain and had a clinical suspicion of AA were included in this retrospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results ofpathology, n=48 patients for the AA group and n=54 patients for the non-AA group were identified.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the condition that most commonly requires a surgical procedure in children presenting to the emergencydepartment with acute abdominal pain. Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis scores (PAS) are the most widely used scoring systems in thediagnosis of AA in children. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Alvarado and PAS scores in the diagnosis of AA in children.Materials and Methods: One hundred and two patients aged 3-17 years, who were admitted to the pediatric emergency department with acuteabdominal pain and had a clinical suspicion of AA were included in this retrospective study. The demographic characteristics, laboratory andradiological findings, and Alvarado and PAS scores were obtained from the records of the patients, retrospectively. According to the results ofpathology, n=48 patients for the AA group and n=54 patients for the non-AA group were identified. The AA and non-AA groups were comparedin terms of PAS and Alvarado scores.Results: The mean age of the 102 patients was 9.38±3.90 years, and 62 (60.85%) of them were male. The median PAS score was 7.79±1.2 and5.52±1.34, and the median Alvarado score was 7.98±1.14 and 5.89±1.53 in the AA and N-AA groups, respectively (p 7 with a sensitivity of 66.7%, a specificity of 94.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.4%, and a negative predictivevalue (NPV) of 76.1% (p 7, with a sensitivity of 77.1%, a specificity of 85.2%, PPV of 82.2%,and NPV of 80.7% (p<0.001).Conclusion: Although both PAS and Alvarado scores provide useful diagnostic information in patients suspected of AA, neither of them isenough to diagnose AA alone.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKMENOĞLU, Y., KAÇAR, A., DURAS, E., KÖK, S., GÖZÜBÜYÜK, A. A., ARAT, C., TOPAL, Ö. E. G., KANDIRICI, A., ÖZKAYA, O. (2020). The Role of Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis Score in Acute Appendicitis in Children. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 192–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/362990

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Benabbas R, Hanna M, Shah J, Sinert R. Diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and pointof-care Ultrasound for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24:523-51
  2. Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008. J Surg Res 2012; 175:185-90
  3. Lee WH, O’Brien S, Skarin D, et al. Pediatric Abdominal Pain in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2019
  4. Galai T, Beloosesky OZ, Scolnik D, Rimon A, Glatstein M. Misdiagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in children attending the Emergency Department: The experience of a large, Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2017; 27:138-141
  5. Sung T, Callahan MJ, Taylor GA. Clinical and imaging mimickers of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186:67-74
  6. Kosloske AM, Love CL, Rohrer JE, Goldthorn JF, Lacey SR. The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation. Pediatrics 2004; 113(1pt1):29-34
  7. Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE, et al. Effect of crosssectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 2001; 220:103-7
  8. Kaiser S, Jorulf H, Söderman E, Frenckner B. Impact of radiologic imaging on the surgical decision-making process in suspected appendicitis in children. Acad Radiol 2004; 11:971-9
  9. Löfvenberg F, Salö M. Ultrasound for Appendicitis: Performance and integration with clinical parameters. Biomed Res Int 2016; 6:5697692
  10. Sivitz AB, Cohen SG, Tejani C. Evaluation of acute appendicitis by pediatric emergency physician sonography. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 64:358-64.e4
  11. Rezak A, Abbas HM, Ajemian MS, Dudrick SJ, Kwasnik EM. Decreased use of computed tomography with a modified clinical scoring system in diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2011; 146:64-7
  12. Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Stallion A, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: helical CT. Radiology 2000; 216:430-3
  13. Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37:877-81
  14. Russell WS, Schuh AM, Hill JG, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for pediatric appendicitis evaluation can decrease computed tomography utilization while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013; 29:568-73