Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Transition Time to Full Oral Feeding Skill and Its Determinants in Very Preterm Infants: A Single Center Experience

Pages
216–224
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further studies are required to provide guidance on interventions to shorten FOF time and to provide kangaroo mother care, non-nutritive sucking and breastfeeding in the very preterm population

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Transition from tube to full oral feeding (FOF) represents an important milestone for very preterm infants, and can be affected by various factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this 4-year study, infants’ characteristics, feeding steps, and comorbidities were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further studies are required to provide guidance on interventions to shorten FOF time and to provide kangaroo mother care, non-nutritive sucking and breastfeeding in the very preterm population
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Transition from tube to full oral feeding (FOF) represents an important milestone for very preterm infants, and can be affected by various factors. This study aimed to evaluate transition time to FOF in very preterm infants and to identify the factors affecting this ability. Materials and Methods: In this 4-year study, infants’ characteristics, feeding steps, and comorbidities were retrospectively evaluated. Infants were categorized into two groups based on FOF timing and comparisons were made. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine any affecting factors. Results: Transition from tube to FOF occurred on a median of 20 days. There were 48 and 52 neonates in the ≤20 days and >20 days groups, respectively. Gender, delivery type, and antenatal history were similar between the groups. The majority were supported with formula. More infants were at >30 weeks of gestational age, and had a birth weight >1.47 kg in the ≤20 days group. A lesser proportion of these required invasive interventions, and had comorbidities. In this study, the requirement of non-invasive ventilation ≤3 days, receiving kangaroo mother care, the promotion of non-nutritive sucking within the first week, and the achievement of full enteral feeding in ≤14 days were associated with a positive effect on the transition to FOF in ≤20 days. However, a gestational age of ≤30 weeks and diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia had a negative effect. Conclusion: This was one of the few studies to investigate the timing of transition to FOF in very preterm infants as well as its affecting factors. Further studies are required to provide guidance on interventions to shorten FOF time and to provide kangaroo mother care, non-nutritive sucking and breastfeeding in the very preterm population

🔖

Cite This Article

ER, İ., GÜNLEMEZ, A. (2021). Transition Time to Full Oral Feeding Skill and Its Determinants in Very Preterm Infants: A Single Center Experience. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 216–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/362864

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high risk neonate: proposed guidelines. Pediatrics 2008; 122:1119-26
  2. Stade B, Bishop C. A semidemand feeding protocol reduced time to full oral feeding in healthy preterm infants. Evid Based Nurs. 2002; 5:74
  3. Lubbe W. Clinicians guide for cue-based transition to oral feeding in preterm infants: An easy-to-use clinical guide. J Eval Clin Pract 2018; 24:80-8
  4. Sadler TW. Special embryology: respiratory system and digestive system. In: Sadler TW (ed). Langman’s Medical Embryology,7th ed. Baltimore, MD, Williams and Wilkin: MD, 1995; 232-71
  5. Browne JV, Ross ES. Eating as a neurodevelopmental process for high-risk newborns. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38:731-43
  6. Jadcherla SR, Wang M, Vijayapal AS, Leuthner SR. Impact of prematurity and co-morbidities on feeding milestones in neonates: a retrospective study. J Perinatol 2010; 30:201-8
  7. Foster JP, Psaila K, Patterson T. Non-nutritive sucking for increasing physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 10:CD001071
  8. Kültürsay N, Bilgen H, Türkyılmaz C. Turkish Neonatal Society guideline on enteral feeding of the preterm infant. Turk Pediatri Ars 2018; 53(Suppl 1):S109-18
  9. Hay WW Jr. Strategies for feeding the preterm infant. Neonatology 2008; 94:245
  10. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr 2013; 13:59
  11. Dutta S, Singh B, Chessell L, et al. Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants. Nutrients 2015; 7:423-42
  12. Schanler RJ. Approach to enteral nutrition in the premature infant. In Up To Date, Abrams SA, Hoppins AG (Eds), Up To Date 2017. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/ approach-to-enteral-nutrition-in-the-premature- infant - 13. Parker L, Torrazza RM, Li Y, Talaga E, Shuster J, Neu J. Aspiration and evaluation of gastric residuals in the neonatal intensive care unit: state of the science. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2015; 29:51-9
  13. Berman L, Moss RL. Necrotizing enterocolitis: an update. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 16:145-50
  14. Heuchan AM, Clyman RI. Managing the patent ductus arteriosus: current treatment options. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99:F431-6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306176
  15. Dong Y, Speer CP. Late-onset neonatal sepsis: recent developments. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100:F257- 63
  16. Higgins RD, Jo