Journals / Öneri Dergisi / 1997 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 7

TÜRK YÖNETİCİLERİN AHLAKİ KARAR VERMESİNİ ETKİ EDEN UNSURLAR

Pages
79–82
Publication Date
1997-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that most of the managers identified the behavior of their superiors as most influential factor and managers would like to obtain the views of their superiors while deciding on ethical problems before Consulting other groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This sought to identify factors that contribute to managers' unethical behavior or decision in crganization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study also sought to identify when managers are confronted with an ethical dilemma in performing their job, whom they usually consult.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that most of the managers identified the behavior of their superiors as most influential factor and managers would like to obtain the views of their superiors while deciding on ethical problems before Consulting other groups.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türk yöneticiler · Ahlaki karar verme

Özet

This sought to identify factors that contribute to managers' unethical behavior or decision in crganization. This study also sought to identify when managers are confronted with an ethical dilemma in performing their job, whom they usually consult. The results showed that most of the managers identified the behavior of their superiors as most influential factor and managers would like to obtain the views of their superiors while deciding on ethical problems before Consulting other groups. Findings reported here are based on a questionnaire-survey of 310 Turkish managers from 30 organizations in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURTSEVER, G. (1997). TÜRK YÖNETİCİLERİN AHLAKİ KARAR VERMESİNİ ETKİ EDEN UNSURLAR. Öneri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 7, 79–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/36261

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Zabid, A. R. M. ve S. K. Alsagoff: 1984, “Perceived Ethical Values of Malaysian Managers” Journal o f Business Ethics 12, 333-337. [2] -Hunt S. C. ve S. Vitell: 1986, “A Jounıal Theory of Marketing Ethics”, Journal ofMacromarketing 8,(Spring), 5-16. [3] -Ferrell, O.C. veL.G. Gresham: 1985, “A Contingency Framework For Understanding Ethical Decision-making in marketing”, Journal o f Marketing 49 (Summer), 87-96. [4] -Bartels, R:1967 ”A Model for Ethics in Marketing”, Journal o fMarketing (Jan.), 20-26. [5] -Hosmer, L. T.: 1987, The Ethics of Management (Irwin, Homewood, IL). [6] -Zey Ferell ve O. C. Ferell: 1982, “Role set Confıguration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical behavior in Organizations”, Human Relations 35 (7), 587-604. [7] -Deal, T.E: ve A.A. Kennedy: 1982, Corporate Cultures: The Rites And Rituals o f Corporate Life (Addison Wesley Pub., Reading, MA). [8] -Morris, M. H., A. S. Marks, J. A. Ailen, N. S. Perry: 1996, “Modeling Ethical Attitydes and Behaviors under Conditions of Environmental Turbulence, Journal of BusinessEthics 15, 1119-1130. [9] -Akaah, I.P. ve E.A. Riordan: 1989, “Judgments of Marketing Professionals About Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Replication and Extension”, Journal o f Marketing Research (feb) 112-120. [10]-Hunt S. D., L. B. Chonko ve V. R. Wood: 1989, “Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing”, Journal o f Marketing 53 (July), 79-90. [10] -Schaefer, T. E.: 1984, “Professionalism: Foundation for Business Ethics”, Journal o fBusiness Ethics 3 (4) 269-277. [12]-Kelley, S. W., O. C. Ferrell ve S. K. Skinner: 1990 “Ethical Behavior Among Marketing Researchers: An Assessment of Selected Demographics Characteristics” Journal o f Business Ethics 9,681-68