SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Öneri Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 19

PERFORMANS DEĞERLEME SİSTEMİNİN TOPLAM KALİTE İLKELERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ ve UYUMLAŞTIRMA ÖNERİLERİ

Bilçin TAK
Pages
55–65
Publication Date
2003-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, there are comments on redesigning of the forms using to appraise the performance in terms of measures and measurement scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The companies which are seeking total quality management suffer from some problems related to human resources management practices such as performance appraisal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, traditional performance appraisal system is analyzed based on TQM principles and seven proposals are offered.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, there are comments on redesigning of the forms using to appraise the performance in terms of measures and measurement scale.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Performans değerleme sistemi · Toplam kalite ilkeleri

Özet

The companies which are seeking total quality management suffer from some problems related to human resources management practices such as performance appraisal. That is the reason why some companies fail to achieve employee commitment which is vital for TQM. In this study, traditional performance appraisal system is analyzed based on TQM principles and seven proposals are offered. The main proposals are about; integrating performance appraisal system with the strategic planning process of the organization, aligning individual performance measures with organizational goals, adding multi-rater feedback and team-based performance measurement models to the individual performance appraisal, shortening of the performance appraisal periods, eliminating measurement errors which have steam from the systems and impacts on the individual performance. Also, there are comments on redesigning of the forms using to appraise the performance in terms of measures and measurement scale.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAK, B. (2003). PERFORMANS DEĞERLEME SİSTEMİNİN TOPLAM KALİTE İLKELERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ ve UYUMLAŞTIRMA ÖNERİLERİ. Öneri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 19, 55–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/36165

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. ANTANIONI, D., "Improve the Peıformance Management Process Before Discontinuing Performance Appraisal", Compensation&Benefits Review, May-June 1994, s.29
  2. MOHRMAN, A.; RESNICK, S.; LAWLER, E., Designing Performance Appraisal Systems, Aligning Appraisal and Organizational Realities, Jossey-Bass Pub, San Fransisco, 1990, s.12
  3. GIBSON, R., İşi Yeniden Düşünmek, Çev. Sinem Gül, Sabah Yayınları, İstanbul 1997, s.7
  4. JOINER, B., Fourth Generation Management, Joiner Association Pub, New York 1997, s.243
  5. ECKES, G., "Practical Alternatives to Performance Appraisal", Quality Progress, November 1994, s.58
  6. JUST, K., "Team Performance Management'System that Really Work, Center for the Study Work Teams", Proceedings, 1996, University of Texas, www.unt.edu, s.17
  7. LAWLER, E.E., III, Rewarding Excellence, Pay Strategies for The New Economy, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 2000, s.186
  8. CONGER, J.; FINEGOLD, D.; LAWLER, E., III, "Appraising Boardroom Performance", Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1998, ss.136-148
  9. SENGE, P., "İğnenin Gözünden, Geleceği Yeniden Düşünmek", Der. Rowan GIBSON, Sabah Yayınları, İstanbul 1997, s.123
  10. POLLARD, D.; BUCKLE, R., "Multi-level Balanced Scorecard: Aligning Performance Measurement for Individual, Teams, Business Units and Whole Organization", www.ey.com, s. 1
  11. ROSS, G., "Measurement: Focusing Employee Performance for Alignment", Panaroma Business Views, 1999, s.2
  12. KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D., The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1996, ss.199-224
  13. MORGAN, B.; SCHINEMANN, W., "Measuring People and Performance: Closing the Gaps", Quality Progress, January 1999, s.5
  14. DENTON, D.K., "How a Team Can Grow?", Quality Progress, June 1999, s.53
  15. ZIGON, J., "Team Performance Measurement: A Process for Creating Team Performance Standards", Compensation&Benefits Review, 1997, s.11
  16. COVEY, 5., Etkili İnsanların Yedi Alışkanlığı, Çev. Gönül SUVEREN, Osman DENİZTEKİN, Varlık Yayını, İstanbul, 1997, s.243
  17. HARRINGTON, J., "Performance Improvement: Was Edward Deming Wrong?" TQM Magazine, 1998, s.1
  18. ARMSTRONG, M., Performance Management, Kagan Page Pub. 1994, s.145
  19. ZIGON, J.,"Team Performance Measurement: Common Problems", www.zigonperf.com. [20] "Is Your Performance Appraisal System Team Friendly?", www.zigonperf.com. [21] "Development and Validation of an Engineering Team Performance Scale", http://www.icase.