SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tıp Hukuku Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7

Legal status of traditional medicine in Turkey

Geleneksel tıp bakımından ülkemizdeki hukuki durum

Hakan HAKERİ
Pages
17–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Alternative and conventional medicine has been discussed generally as medical intervention and also in terms of new regulation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study I have discussed in our country long time debated and discussed alternative and conventional medicine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has been also regulated in turkish legislation recently.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Alternative and conventional medicine has been discussed generally as medical intervention and also in terms of new regulation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study I have discussed in our country long time debated and discussed alternative and conventional medicine. It has been also regulated in turkish legislation recently. Alternative and conventional medicine has been discussed generally as medical intervention and also in terms of new regulation.

Özet

Bu çalışmada ülkemizde uzun süredir tartışılan ve son zamanda da mevzuatta düzenlenen alternatif ve geleneksel tıp üzerinde durulmuştur. Konu tıp hukuku açısından genel olarak ele alındıktan başka, yeni yü- rürlüğe giren mevzuat da değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAKERİ, H. (2015). Legal status of traditional medicine in Turkey. Tıp Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7, 17–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/361549

References (15)

  1. Aşçıoğlu, Çetin, Tıbbi Yardım ve El Atmalardan Doğan Sorum- luluklar, Ankara 1992.
  2. Ayan, Mehmet, Tıbbi Müdahalelerden Doğan Hukuki Sorumluluk, Ankara 1991.
  3. Bayraktar, Köksal, Hekimin Tedavi Nedeniyle Cezai Sorumluluğu, İstanbul 1972.
  4. Bodenburg, Reinhard, Alternative Medizin im Spannungsfeld von Heilungschancen und aertzlichem Risiko, NJOZ 2009.
  5. Boumil, Marcia M./Elias, Clifford E./Moes, Diane Bissonette, Medical Liability, St. Paul 2003. http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatif_tıp (ET. 16.02.2014). L/U- Yazar: Laufs, Adolf/Uhlenbruck, Wilhelm, Handbuch des Arztrechts, 3. B., München 2002.
  6. Pap, Michael, “Zur Leistungspflicht der Krankenkassen für medizinisch vertretbare Heilversuche bei Fehlen erfolgversprechender Standardtherapien”, MedR 1988.
  7. Rumler-Detzel, Pia, “Therapiefreiheit und Berufshaftpflicht des Arztes”, VersR 1989, S. 1008-1010.
  8. Schmid, Hugo, “Die Grenzen der Therapiefreiheit”, NJW 1986, S. 2339-2343.
  9. Siebert, Arvid, “Strafrechtliche Grenzen ärztlicher Therapiefreiheit”, MedR 1983, S. 216-220 (Siebert, MedR 1983).
  10. Siebert, Arvid, Strafrechtliche Grenzen ärztlicher Therapiefreiheit, Berlin, Heidelberg 1983.
  11. Somer, Pervin, Ülkemizde tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıbbın hukuki dayanağı ve sorumluluk alanları üzerine, http://www.sdplatform.com/ Dergi/592/Ulkemizde-tamamlayici-ve-alternatif-tibbin-hukuki-dayanagi- ve-sorumluluk-alanlari-uzerine.aspx (ET, 15.02.2014).
  12. Tania, Sebastian/Sandhya, Gupta, A Slice of Law and Medicine: Legal Issues in the use of Alternative and Complementary Medicine in Mental Disorders, International Journal of Nursing Education, July- December 2011, Vol.3, No.2, s. 121-124.
  13. Taşçı, Ali İhsan, Adli tıp penceresinden alternatif tıp uygulamaları, http://www.sdplatform.com/Dergi/593/Adli-tip-penceresinden-alternatif- tip-uygulamalari.aspx (ET, 14.02.2014). The regulatory status of Complementary and Alternative Medicine for medical doctors in Europe, Belgium 2010.
  14. Tokaç, Mahmut, Geleneksel Tıbba Akademik Yaklaşım: GETTAM, http://www.sdplatform.com/Yazilar/Kose-Yazilari/344/Geleneksel- tibba- akademik-yaklasim-GETTAM.aspx, (ET. 12.02.2014)
  15. Yorulmaz, A.Coşkun/Kır, Ziya/Ketenci, H.Çetin, “Tıbbi Uygu- lama Hataları ve Bilirkişilik”, Yeni Yasalar Çerçevesinde Hekimlerin Hukuki ve Cezai Sorumluluğu, Tıbbi Malpraktis ve Adli Raporların Dü- zenlenmesi, (Editörler: Çetin/Yorulmaz), İstanbul 2006.