Journals / Tıp Hukuku Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 10

(CAN A NURSE BE PUNISHED WHO WAS ACTING ACCORDING TO ART. 6 OF NURSE REGULATION)

HEMŞİRELİK YÖNETMELİĞİ'NİN 6. MADDESİNE UYGUN HAREKET EDEN HEMŞİRE CEZALANDIRILABİLİR Mİ?

Pages
477–505
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite of the provisions of the regulations, a nurse who follows orders will be held responsible in addition to the liability of doctor who gives the order.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to Nursing Regulations Art. 6/1-b, "although nurses predict the potantial damage about medical diagnosis and treatment, they discuss the situation with the doctor and if the doctor insist on practising the process, they follow the process given by doctors according to their written request." It is clear that doctor who gives the order that forms a basis of crime will be held liable in criminal law (also according to administrative law and public law), but the problem here is whether nurses who follow the orders will be held liable or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even though within this problem, code (law) has seen as enforcement of legal provision, here, there is no legal provision and as a matter of fact, the regulation breaches both Turkish Constitution (Art. 137) and Code (Turkish Criminal Code Art. 24) and also lack of regulations on the orders that may become a crime during its application, assessing in the eye of this matter would be defective.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite of the provisions of the regulations, a nurse who follows orders will be held responsible in addition to the liability of doctor who gives the order.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

According to Nursing Regulations Art. 6/1-b, "although nurses predict the potantial damage about medical diagnosis and treatment, they discuss the situation with the doctor and if the doctor insist on practising the process, they follow the process given by doctors according to their written request." It is clear that doctor who gives the order that forms a basis of crime will be held liable in criminal law (also according to administrative law and public law), but the problem here is whether nurses who follow the orders will be held liable or not. Even though within this problem, code (law) has seen as enforcement of legal provision, here, there is no legal provision and as a matter of fact, the regulation breaches both Turkish Constitution (Art. 137) and Code (Turkish Criminal Code Art. 24) and also lack of regulations on the orders that may become a crime during its application, assessing in the eye of this matter would be defective. Law (or regulation) does not regulate the matter of order, but it regulates on giving instructions to nurses by doctors about medical intervention in a concrete case and their relationship in "receiving ordersgiving orders". The problem here occurs in this article, when this relationship constituted with the law or regulation and when there is a concerete case on doctors and nurses are in the same medical intervention team and nurses follow the order given by doctors. That's why, the problem originated by the regulation doesn't occur because of the cooperation between nurse and doctor and their relationship about giving and taking instructions about orders, but it is related to the matter of order and how nurses can predict the crime related result. The order given within this relationship doesn't really related to the subject of this problem examined in this article and this cooperation and following the instructions are related to medical law and law itself. For assessing clearly, that relevant regulations can exculpate criminal liability of nurse, constitutional and legal provisions about carrying out the order given by competent authority should be examined. Turkish legislation forbids to justify criminal order that is regulated by regulation. Despite of the provisions of the regulations, a nurse who follows orders will be held responsible in addition to the liability of doctor who gives the order.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNVER, Y. (2016). (CAN A NURSE BE PUNISHED WHO WAS ACTING ACCORDING TO ART. 6 OF NURSE REGULATION). Tıp Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 10, 477–505. https://ajindex.com/articles/361530

References (12)

  1. Basler Kommentar (Niggli - Wirprächtiger - Hrsg.), Strafrecht I, Band: I, 2. Auflage, Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag 2007.
  2. CENTEL, Nur-ZAFER, Hamide-ÇAKMUT, Özlem. Türk Ceza Hukukuna Giriş., 8. Baskı, İstanbul 2014. Das dänische Strafgesetz - Straffeloven (Deutsche übersetzung und Einführung von Karin Cornils und Vagn Greve)., Freiburg i. Br. 1997. Das französissche Strafgesetzbuch - Code Pénal (Deutsche Übersetzung von Gesine Bauknecht und Liselote Lüdicke - Einführung von Heike Jung)., Freiburg i. Br. 1999. Das portugiesische Strafgesetzbuch - Códige Penal Português (Deutsche Übersetzung und Einführung von João Manuel Fernandes)., Freiburg i. Br. 2010. Das spanische Strafgesetzbuch Código Penal (Deutsche Übersetzung von Markus Hoffmann - Einführung von Enrique Bacigalupo)., Freiburg i. Br. 2002.
  3. DEĞİRMENCİ, Olgun. Türk Ceza Hukukunda Kusurluluğu Kaldıran Neden Olarak Amirin Emrini İfa., TAAD 2012, Sy: 10, sh: 455- 484. DEMİRBAŞ, Timur. Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler., 11. Baskı, Ankara 2016.
  4. DEMİREL, Hakkı. Emrin İcrası Suretiyle İşlenilen Suçlar., AÜHFD C:7, Sy: 1-2, 1950, sh: 116-121.
  5. DÖNMEZER, Sulhi-ERMAN, Sahir. Nazarî ve Tatbikî Ceza Hukuku - Genel Kısım, C: II, 10. Baskı, İstanbul 1994.
  6. DURSUN, Selman. Türk Ceza Hukuku'nda Emrin İfasının Hukuki Niteliğinin Alman ve İtalyan Ceza Hukuku'yla Karşılaştırmalı Olarak İncelenmesi., GÜHFD 2014, C: XVIII, Sy: 2, sh: 203-252.
  7. İÇEL, Kayıhan. İçel Ceza Hukuku - Genel Hükümler., İstanbul 2016. StGB Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch., 2. Auflage, Liberalis Verlag AG, Zürich 2003. Strafgesetzbuch der russischen Föderation (Deutsche übersetzung von Friedrich-Christian Schroeder und Thomas Bednarz - Einführung von Friedrich-Christian Schroeder)., Freiburg i. Br. 1998. Das schwedische Kriminalgesetzbuch Brottsbalken (Deutsche übersetzung und Einführung von Karin Cornils und Nils Jareborg).,Freiburg i. Br. 2000.
  8. ÖZBEK, Veli Özer-KANBUR, Mehmet Nihat-DOĞAN, KorayBACAKSIZ, Pınar-TEPE, İlker. Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler., 6. Baskı, Ankara 2015.
  9. ÖZER, Cumhur. Ceza Hukukunda Hukuka Uygunluk Nedeni Olarak Emrin Yerine Getirilmesi (yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi)., SDÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü., Isparta 2002.
  10. ÖZGENÇ, İzzet. Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 11. Baskı, Ankara 2015.
  11. ÜNVER, Yener. Müdavi Hekim-Konsültan Hekim İlişkisinin Ceza Hukuku Açısından Değerlendirilmesi - VII. Türk-Alman Tıp Hukuku Sempozyumu., Tıpta İşbirliği ve Hukuksal Sorunlar., Samsun 2010, sh: 99-122.
  12. ZAFER, Hamide. Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (TCK m.