Journals / Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Utilization of mixolabin bread wheat quality evaluation

Ekmeklik buğday kalite değerlendirmesinde miksolab cihazının kullanımı

Pages
7–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that miksolab is a suitable device for the evaluation of quality characteristics of (as quality protein, enzymatic activity , starch retrogradation, etc.) bread wheat breeding materials.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this stud y, 7 varieties and 18 line winter wheat were used to examine the appropriateness of mixolab devic e for th e evaluation of bread wheat breedin g materials .
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the obtained results by the mixolab values and wheat genotype characteristics; relationship between the C1 value and protein conten t an d Zelen y sedimentation , th e C2 valu e an d hardness , th e C 4 protei n conten t an d Zelen y sedimentation negative and significantly important (P<0.05); The relationships between C1 -C2 and protein content, Zelen y sedimentation , hardnes s an d bread weigh t negativ e an d significantl y importan t an d beta angle with protein content and hardness were also significant (P<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that miksolab is a suitable device for the evaluation of quality characteristics of (as quality protein, enzymatic activity , starch retrogradation, etc.) bread wheat breeding materials.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this stud y, 7 varieties and 18 line winter wheat were used to examine the appropriateness of mixolab devic e for th e evaluation of bread wheat breedin g materials . Withi n thi s work, protei n content, hardness , Zelen y sedimentation , bread volum e an d bread weigh t analysi s of th e wheat samples , i n besid e of th e rheological properties of wheat flour were tested by mixolab device. The relationship between some quality characteristics of wheat genotypes were investigated by mixolab device. According to the obtained results by the mixolab values and wheat genotype characteristics; relationship between the C1 value and protein conten t an d Zelen y sedimentation , th e C2 valu e an d hardness , th e C 4 protei n conten t an d Zelen y sedimentation negative and significantly important (P<0.05); The relationships between C1 -C2 and protein content, Zelen y sedimentation , hardnes s an d bread weigh t negativ e an d significantl y importan t an d beta angle with protein content and hardness were also significant (P<0.05). It was concluded that miksolab is a suitable device for the evaluation of quality characteristics of (as quality protein, enzymatic activity , starch retrogradation, etc.) bread wheat breeding materials.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ekmekli k buğday ıslah materyalini n değerlendirilmesind e miksolab cihazını n kullanı m uygunluğunu değerlendirmek için 18 adet kışlık buğday hattı ile 7 adet çeşidi materyal olarak kullanılmıştı r. Çalışma ile buğday örneklerinin protein içeriği, sertlik, Zeleny sedimantasyon, ekmek hacmi ve ekmek ağırlık analizleri yanında buğday unlarının reolojik özellikleri miksolab cihazı ile test edilmişti r. Buğday genotiplerinin bazı kalite özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler miksolab cihazı ile incelenmişti r. Elde edilen sonuçlar göre miksolab değerleri il e buğday genoti p özellikler i arasınd a ilişkilerden C 1 değeri il e protei n oran ı v e Zelen y sedimantasyon, C2 değeri ile sertlik (p<0.05), C4 ile protein oranı ve Zeleny sedimantasyon arasında negatif v e öneml i (P<0.05), C1 -C 2 il e protei n oranı , Zelen y sedimantasyon , sertli k v e ekmek ağırlığ ı arasınd a negati f ve önemli, beta açısı ile protein oranı ve sertlik arasındaki ilişkiler de önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.05). Ekmeklik buğday ıslah materyalini n kalite özelliklerini n değerlendirilmesind e (protei n kalitesi , enzimati k aktivite, nişasta retrogradasyonu vb.) miksolab'ın uygun bir cihaz olduğu kanaatine varılmıştı r.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, M., AYDOĞAN, S., GÖÇMEN, A. A., HAMZAOĞLU, S. (2014). Utilization of mixolabin bread wheat quality evaluation. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 7–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/360631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abdel -Sami e M.A., Wan J.J., Huan g W.N., Chun g K.O., Xu B.C., 2010.E ffects of cumi n an d ginger as antioxidants on doug h mixin g properties an d cooki e quality. Cereal Chem 87: 454-460. Anonim, 1981. Standard Method s of International Association for Cereal Scienc e an d Technology (ICC). Vienna, Austria. Anonim, 1990. AAC C Approved Method s of th e American Association of Cereal Chemist, USA. Angiolon i A., Collar C., 2009. Significanc e of structuring/ prebiotic blends on bread dough thermo-mechanical profile. Eu r Food Res Technol. 229: 603-610. Ban u I.,Stoenesc u G.,Ionesc u V., Aprod u I., 201 1. Estimation of th e bakin g quality of wheat flours based on rheological parameters of the Mixolab curve. Czec h J. Food Sci. (29) 35– 44. Collar C., Bollain C., Rosell C.M., 2007. Rheological behaviour of formulated bread doughs during mixing an d heating. Food Scienc e an d Technology International, 13:99–107. Dhaka V., Gulia N., Khatkar B.S., 2012. Application of Mixolab to Asses s th e Bread Makin g Quality of Wheat Varieties. 1: 183. doi:10.4172/ scientificreports.183 Dubat A., 2010. A new AACC international approved method to measure rheological properties of a dough sample. Cereal Foods World (CFW), 55 (3), 150. Edwards N.M., Dexter J.E., Scanlon M.G., 2002. Starch participation i n duru m dough linear viscoelasti c properties. Cereal Chemistry (79) 850–856. Elgün, A., Türker, S., Bilgiçli, N. 2001. Tahı l v e Ürünlerind e Analiti k Kalite Kontrol ü Selçu k Ün v. Gıda Mühendisliği Bölümü Ders Notları. Konya Tic. Borsası Yayın No:2 Huan g W.N., Li L.L., Wan g F., Wan J.J., Tilley M., 2010. E ffec t of transglutaminas e on rheological an d mixolab thermomechanical characteristic s of oat dough. Food Chem 121: 934-939. Kahraman K.,Sakyyan O., Ozturk S., Koksel H.,Sumn u G,Dubat A., 2008.Utilization of Mixolab to predict the suitability of flours i n term s of cake quality. European Food Research Technolog y, 227: 565–570, Köksel H., Kahraman K.,Sanal T., Sivri Özay D., Dubat A., 2009. Potential utilization of mixolab for quality evaluation of bread wheat genotypes V.86, (5) P. 522 - 526. Rosell C.M., Collar C., Haros M., 2007. Assessment of hydrocolloi d on th e thermomechanical properties of wheat using the mixolab. Food Hydrocolloids,21:452–462. Szafranska A., 2010. Prognozowanı e jakosc ı makı pszennej n a podstawı e parametrów ocen y jakosc ı sruty z a pomoc a aparatu miksolab. Prace Instytutów i Lab