Journals / Tekstil Maraton / 2006 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 86

Ingredient branding: A competitive strategy for the Turkish cotton and textile industry against Asian competitors in global markets

Türk pamukçuluk ve tekstil sektörlerinin dünya pazarlarında Asyalı üreticilerle baş edebilmesini sağlayacak rekabetçi bir strateji içerik odaklı markalaşma

Pages
67–73
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to presenting specific ingredient branding strategic options, the paper makes some specific recommendations in implementing the ingredient branding.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ingredient branding has proven very successful for many companies across a variety of industries in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper presents a conceptual framework to show how the Turkish cotton and textile industry can employ ingredient branding as a competitive strategy to differentiate and promote its products in the global marketplace.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to presenting specific ingredient branding strategic options, the paper makes some specific recommendations in implementing the ingredient branding.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ingredient branding has proven very successful for many companies across a variety of industries in recent years. Prominent examples include Intel, NutraSweet, and DuPont's Teflon. The main goal of ingredient branding is to take advantage of the potential synergy of two or more brands that share a common brand space. This paper presents a conceptual framework to show how the Turkish cotton and textile industry can employ ingredient branding as a competitive strategy to differentiate and promote its products in the global marketplace. While the Turkish textile industry historically has enjoyed a strong reputation for quality, it is increasingly coming under pressure from cheaper Asian textiles. The paper suggests that Turkey could develop an ingredient branding strategy using its high quality cotton to differenti¬ate its cotton and textile products in the global marketplace. In addition to presenting specific ingredient branding strategic options, the paper makes some specific recommendations in implementing the ingredient branding.

Özet

Son yıllarda, içerik odaklı markalaşma (ingredient branding) stratejisinin farklı sektörlerde yer alan birçok firmanın başarısında büyük rol oynadığını görülmektedir. Genel olarak bilinen örnekler arasında Intel, NutraSweet ve DuPont Teflon'u göstermek mümkündür. İçerik odaklı markalaşmanın temel amacı, aynı alana hitap eden iki veya daha fazla markanın birlikte yaratabileceği potansiyel sinerjinin avantajlarından faydalanmaktır. Bu çalışmada, Türk pamukçuluk ve tekstil sektörlerinin, ürünlerini farklılaştırmak ve dünya pazarlarındaki değerini yükseltmek amacıyla "içerik odaklı markalaşma" kavramını nasıl uygulayabileceği konusunda kavramsal bir çerçeve oluşturulmaya çalışılmıştır. Her ne kadar Türk tekstil endüstrisi tarihsel olarak kalitesiyle ünlü olsa da, Asya menşeli ucuz ürünlerin gittikçe artan baskısına maruz kalmaktadır. Çalışmada, Türkiye'nin yüksek kaliteli pamuğunu kullanarak bir içerik odaklı markalaşma stratejisi geliştirebileceği ve böylece pamukçuluk ve tekstil ürünlerini rakiplerinden farklılaştırabileceği öngörülmektedir. Aynı zamanda çalışmada, içerik odaklı markalaşma kavramı bünyesindeki stratejik seçenekler hakkında bilgi sunularak, bu kavramın uygulanmasıyla ilgili spesifik önerilere de yer verilmişti

🔖

Cite This Article

PINAR, M., TRAPP, P. S. (2006). Ingredient branding: A competitive strategy for the Turkish cotton and textile industry against Asian competitors in global markets. Tekstil Maraton, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 86, 67–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/359762

References (2)

  1. Aaker, David (2003). "The Power of the Branded Differentiator," MIT Sloan Management Review. Vol.45, No.l (Fall): 83-87. 2.Akalin, Mehmet (2001), "Insights into Turkish Textile and Apparel Industry," Electronic Journal of Textile, Vol. l,No. 1,2001. 3.Anonymous (2005), "Turkey; Pushing for Quality," DNR News, (June 6), p. 24. 4.Anonymous (2001), "Supply and distribution of Cotton," 60. Plenary Meeting, ICAC. 5.Bozkurt, Y. and H. Kadoglu (1994), "Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon," pp. 34-46. 6.Gazanfer, Sabahattin (2003), "An Overview of the Turkish cotton industry with special emphasis on the available tools and techniques of price risk management' Aegean Textiles and Raw Materials Exports Union Report. 7.Hudson, Daren (1994), "The Turkish Cotton Industry: Structure and Operations", Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Tech University,Lubbock, TX. 8.Karapinar,Banu O. and Nilifer Erdem (2003),"Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Yarn Spun from Aegean Cotton Fibers and Their Mixtures with South-East Anatolian Cotton Fibers", Fibers & Textile in Eastern Europe, (October/December) Vol. 11, No. 4, pp.26-29. 9.Keller, Kevin Lane (2003), Strategic Brand Management, 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 10.Keller, K.L., and Aaker, D.A. (1992), "The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.29, (February), pp. 35-40. 11.Kumar, Nirmalya (2004)
  2. Marketing as Strategy, Boston: HBS. 12.McCarthy, Michael S., and Donald G. Norris (1999), "Improving Competitive Position Using Branded Ingredients," The Journal of Product and Brand Management Vol.8, Iss.4, pp. 267-285. 13.Park, C.W., Jun, S.Y. and Shocker, A.D. (1996), "Composite Branding Alliances: an Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects," Journal of Marketing Research Vol.33, (November), pp.453-66. 14.Porter, Michael (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York. 15.Reichheld, Frederick (2001), Loyalty Rules. HBS: Boston. 16.Reichheld, Fred (2006), The Ultimate Question. HBS: Boston. 17.Simonin, B.L. and Ruth, J.A. (1998), "Is a Company Known by the Company it Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes," Journal of Marketing Research Vol.35, No.45, (February), pp.30-42. 18.Smith, Ron (2004), "World wants quality cotton", Southwest Farm Press (February 24) 19.Vaidyanathan, Rajiv, and Praveen Aggarwal (2000), "Strategic Brand Alliances: Implications of Ingredient Branding for National