SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Technology / 2003 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Surface roughness measurement methods and their comparison

Yüzey pürüzlülüğü ölçme yöntemleri ve mukayesesi

ABDULKADİR GÜLLÜ
Ahmet ÖZDEMİR
HALİL DEMİR
Journal
Technology
Pages
79–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is aimed that this paper makes a guidence for the researchers who wants to measure surface roughness, and is a source for appropriate selection of surface roughness measurement method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Surface roughness of the mechanical parts that are manufactured by chip removal is the result of material structure, machining parameters and method selected.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the various researches, the correct measurement of surface roughness and the selection of the best surface roughness measurement method are accepted as a very important decision for the production method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is aimed that this paper makes a guidence for the researchers who wants to measure surface roughness, and is a source for appropriate selection of surface roughness measurement method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Surface roughness of the mechanical parts that are manufactured by chip removal is the result of material structure, machining parameters and method selected. In the various researches, the correct measurement of surface roughness and the selection of the best surface roughness measurement method are accepted as a very important decision for the production method. In this study, methods used today and their technical properties for the measurement and control of the surface roughness are summarized. It is aimed that this paper makes a guidence for the researchers who wants to measure surface roughness, and is a source for appropriate selection of surface roughness measurement method.

Özet

Talaş kaldırarak imal edilen makine parçalarında elde edilen yüzey pürüzlülüğü, malzeme yapısının, seçilen işleme şartlarının ve yönteminin kesin bir göstergesi olmuştur. Yapılan çeşitli araştırmarlarda yüzey pürüzlülüğünün doğru olarak ölçülmesi ve üretim şekli için en uygun yüzey pürüzlülük ölçme yönteminin tercih edilmesi önemli bir adım olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada; meydana gelen pürüzlülüğün ölçülmesi veya kontrol edilmesinde, günümüzde kullanılan yöntemler ve bu yöntemlerin teknik özellikleri özetlenmiştir. Yüzey pürüzlülüğünü ölçmeye dayalı araştırma yapanlara bir kılavuz kaynak olması ve doğru yöntem seçimi için yol göstermek amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLLÜ, A., ÖZDEMİR, A., DEMİR, H. (2003). Surface roughness measurement methods and their comparison. Technology, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 79–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/359673

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. ISO 5725-1, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results, Part 1: General Principals and Definitions, 1994.
  2. TEKNOLOJİ, Yıl 6, Sayı 1-2, 2003 91 2. ISO 5725-2, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results, Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproductability Of Standard Measurement Method, 1994. 3. ISO 5725-3,Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods And Results, Part 3: Intermediate Measure of The Precision of a Standard Measurement Method, 1994. 4. ISO 5725-4, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods And Results, Part 4: Basic Method For The Determination of The Trueness of a Standard Measurement Method, 1994. 5. ISO 5725-5, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods And Results, Part 5: Alternative Methods for the Determination of the Precision of a Standard Measurement Method, 1998. 6. ISO 5725-6, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results, Part 6: Use In Practice of Accuracy Values, 1994. 7. Güllü, A., “Silindirik Taşlamada İstenen Yüzey Pürüzlülüğünü Elde Etmek İçin Taşlama Parametrelerinin Bilgisayar Yardımıyla Optimizasyonu”, Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Eylül - 1995. 8. Sherington, I and Smith, E.H., “Parameters for Characterizing The Surface Topography of Engineering Components”. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, 201 (c4), 297-306, 1987. 9. Thomas, T. R., Characterizing of Suface Roughness. Precision Engng, 1 3 (2), 97-104, 981. 10. Thomas, T. R. and Charton, G., “Variation of Roughness Parameters On Same Typical Manufactured Surfaces”. Precision Engng, 3 (2), 91-96, 1981. 11. King, T. G. and Spedding, T.A., On The Relationships Between Surface Profile Height Parameters. Wear, 83, 91-108, 1982. 12. Reason, R. E., The Measurement Of Surface Texture, 1970 (RTH). 13. A. J. T. Scar, “Metrology and Precision Engineering”, Mc. Graw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New York, 1991. 14. ISO 4287 / 1 - 1984 (E / F / R). 15. Dagnall, H., Exploring Surface Texture, 1980 (RTH). 16. Barash, M., "Shop Built Instrument Checks Surface Finishes", Machinery 72, 177, 1966. 17. Törnebohm, H., “Modern Tolerance Requirements and Their Scientific Determination”, Mechanical Engineering, 411, July 1936. 18. Kamnev, V. V., “Integral Evaluation of Surfaces Roughness”, Measmt. Tech., no:2 February 1966. 19. Nicolau, M., “Aplication du Micromètre Solex à la Mesure de l'ètat des Surfaces”, Mecanique 1937. 20. Graneek, M., Lee, A. M.