Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 66

The effeccts of belief in a just world and gender on counterproductive work behaviors

Adil dünya inancı ve cinsiyetin üretim karşıtı iş davranışları üzerindeki etkisi

Pages
73–86
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results also showed that male participants displayed more counterproductive work behaviors on abuse, sabotage and theft dimensions than did female participants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was carried out to investigate the effects of belief in a just world and gender on counterproductive work behaviors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Belief in a Just World and Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist were administered to 400 public and private sectors employees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results also showed that male participants displayed more counterproductive work behaviors on abuse, sabotage and theft dimensions than did female participants.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kötüye kullanma · abuse

Abstract

The present study was carried out to investigate the effects of belief in a just world and gender on counterproductive work behaviors. Belief in a Just World and Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist were administered to 400 public and private sectors employees. Two separate 2 (belief in a just world: high-low) x 2 (gender: male-female) MANOVA's applied to general and personal belief in a just world. The results of following ANOVA's indicated that participants low in general belief in a just world as compared with those high in general belief in a just world scored higher on withdrawal dimension of CBW. Similarly, participants low in personal belief in a just world scored higher on abuse, withdrawal and sabotage dimensions. The results also showed that male participants displayed more counterproductive work behaviors on abuse, sabotage and theft dimensions than did female participants.

Özet

Bu araştırma adil dünya inancı ile üretim karşıtı iş davranışları arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığını ve sergilenen üretim karşıtı iş davranışlarının türü açısından cinsiyete bağlı farklılıkların bulunup bulunmadığını incelenmek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Bu amaçla 400 kamu ve özel sektör çalışanına Üretim Karşıtı îş Davranışları Ölçeği ile Adil Dünya İnancı Ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Genel ve kişisel adil dünya inançları için ayrı ayrı uygulanan 2 (adil dünya inancı: yüksek-düşük) x 2 (cinsiyet: kadın-erkek) MANOVA ve izleyen ANOVA sonuçları genel adil dünya inancı düşük olan katılımcıların geri çekilme, kişisel adil dünya inancı düşük olanların ise kötüye kullanma, sabotaj ve geri çekilme boyutlarında yer alan üretim karşıtı iş davranışlarını adil dünya inancı yüksek olanlardan daha fazla sergilediklerini ortaya koymuştur. Bulgular, aynı zamanda erkeklerin kötüye kullanma, çalma ve sabotaj boyutunda yer alan üretim karşıtı iş davranışlarını kadınlardan daha fazla gerçekleştirdikleri göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖCEL, H., AYDIN, O. (2010). The effeccts of belief in a just world and gender on counterproductive work behaviors. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 66, 73–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/357896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real world- settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291-322.
  2. Ball, G. A., Trevino, L. K. ve Sims, H. P. Jr. (1993). Just and unjust punishment influences on subordinate and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 299-322.
  3. Baron, R. A. (2004). Workplace aggression and violence: Insights from basic research. R. W. Griffin ve A. O'Leary- Kelly, (Ed.), The dark side of organizational behavior içinde (23-61). San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Bayram, N., Gürsakal, N. ve Bilgel, N. (2009). Counterproductive work behavior among white-collar employees: A study from Turkey. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 180-188.
  4. Begue, L. ve Muller, D. (2006). Belief in a just world as moderator of hostile attributional bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 117-126.
  5. Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S. ve Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410-424.
  6. Bettencourt, B. A. ve Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychology Bulletin, 119, 422-447.
  7. Bowling, N. A. ve Eschleman, K. J. (2010). Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 91-103.
  8. Bukhari, Z. ve Ali, U. (2009). Relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior in the geographical context of Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 4, 85-92.
  9. Correria, I., ve Dalbert, C. (2008). School bullying: Belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims, and defenders. European Psychologist, 13, 248-254.
  10. Cremer, D. D., ve Sedikides, C. (2005). Self uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 157-173
  11. Cubela Adoric, V. ve Kvartuc, T. (2007). Effects of mobbing on justice beliefs and adjustment. European Psychologist, 72,261-271.
  12. Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1241-1255.
  13. Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.
  14. Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a pe