SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 60

Self-Related Differences in Future Time Orientations

Geleceğe İlişkin Yönelimlerle Benlik Tipine Bağlı Farklılıklar

E. Olcay İMAMOĞLU
Ayça EDWARDS GÜLER
Pages
115–138
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed in the framework of future attitudes and the BID Model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study was to explore patterns in Turkish university students' orientations toward the future, and to investigate how those orientations differed according to their self-types, as suggested by the Balanced Integration and Differentiation (BID) Model (İmamoğlu, 1995; 1998; 2003).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, Attitudes toward the Future Scale, developed for the present purposes, Positive Future Expectations Scale (İmamoğlu, 2001), Future Time Orientation Scale (Gjesme, 1979), and the BID Scale (İmamoğlu, 1998; 2003) were administered to 295 Turkish university students (170 women, 125 men), who participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed in the framework of future attitudes and the BID Model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore patterns in Turkish university students' orientations toward the future, and to investigate how those orientations differed according to their self-types, as suggested by the Balanced Integration and Differentiation (BID) Model (İmamoğlu, 1995; 1998; 2003). Accordingly, Attitudes toward the Future Scale, developed for the present purposes, Positive Future Expectations Scale (İmamoğlu, 2001), Future Time Orientation Scale (Gjesme, 1979), and the BID Scale (İmamoğlu, 1998; 2003) were administered to 295 Turkish university students (170 women, 125 men), who participated in the study. Comparisons of the data from the scales used suggested that it was meaningful to conceptualize the participants 'future orientations as Positive, Anxious, and Planned. In terms of self-related differences, respondents with related-individuated and separated-patterned self-types, proposed by the BID Model to represent the most balanced and unbalanced self-types, respectively, significantly differed from each other in that the former group seemed to have a more favorable outlook toward the future. Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed in the framework of future attitudes and the BID Model.

Özet

Bu makalede sunulan çalışmada, gençlerin geleceğe ilişkin yönelim örüntülerinin saptanması ve ilgili yönelimlerin Dengeli Bütünleşme ve Ayrışma/Ayırdetme (Denge) Modeli 'nin (İmamoğlu, 1995; 1998; 2003) öngördüğü benlik tiplerine göre nasıl farklılaştığının araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmaya katılan 295 üniversite öğrencisine (170 kız, 125 erkek) bu araştırma amacıyla geliştirilmiş olan Geleceğe Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği ile Olumlu Gelecek Beklentisi Ölçeği (İmamoğlu, 2001), Gelecek Zaman Yönelimi Ölçeği (Gjesme, 1979), ve Dengeli Bütünleşme - Ayrışma (Denge) Ölçeği (İmamoğlu, 1998; 2003) uygulanmıştır. Ölçeklerden elde edilen veriler-arası ilişkilerden, gençlerin geleceğe ilişkin yönelimlerini Olumlu, Kaygılı ve Planlı olmak üzere üç temel boyutta kavramsallaştırmanın anlamlı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Benliğe bağlı farklılıklar bakımından ise, Denge Modeli 'nce psikolojik işlevler bakımından sırasıyla en olumlu ve en olumsuz benlik tipleri olarak önerilen ilişkili-kendileşmiş (dengeli) ile kopuk-kalıplaşmış (dengesiz) benlik tiplerindeki kişilerin geleceğe yönelimlerinde anlamlı farklılıklar gözlenmiştir. Bulgular, geleceğe ilişkin tutumların benlik ile ilişkisi ve Denge Modeli çerçevesinde tartışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

İMAMOĞLU, E. O., GÜLER, A. E. (2007). Self-Related Differences in Future Time Orientations. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 60, 115–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/357869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1972). Attachment and dependency: A comparison. J. L. Gewirtz, (Ed.), Attachment and dependency içinde (97-137).
  2. Washington, DC: Winston &Sons. Angyal, A. (1951). Neurosis and treatment: A holistic theory. New York: Wiley. Aspinwall, L. G., Richter, L. ve Hoffman, R. R., III. (2001). Understanding how optimism works: An examination of optimists' adaptive moderation of belief and behavior. H. S. Friedman, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health (Vol. 3) içinde (217-238).
  3. San Diego, CA: Academic. Bembenutty, H. ve Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychological Review, 16, 35-57.
  4. Block, J. H. (1976). Issues, problems, and pitfalls in assessing sex differences: A critical review of "The Psychology of Sex Differences". Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 22, 283-308.
  5. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge. Brannon L. (1999). Gender psychological perspectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Buccheri, R., Gesu, V. D. ve Saniga, M. (2000). Studies on the structure of time: From physics to psycho(patho)logy. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  6. Calster, K. V., Lens, W. ve Nuttin, J. R. (1987). Affective attitude toward the personal future: Impact on motivation in high school boys. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 1-13.
  7. Cottle, T. J. ve Klineberg, S. L. (1974). The present of things future: Exploration of time in human experience. New York: Free Press.
  8. De Volder, M. L. ve Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective: A cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 571-655.
  9. Freeman, M. A. (1997). Demographic correlates of individualism and collectivism: A study of social values in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 321-341.
  10. Gezici, M. ve Güvenç, G. (2003). Çalışan kadınların ve ev kadınlarının benlik algısı ve benlik kurgusu açısından karşılaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 18, 1-17.
  11. Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve Negatif Duygu Durum Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15, 19-28.
  12. Gjesme, T. (1979). Future time orientation as a function of achievement motives, ability, delay of gratification, and sex. The Journal of Psychology, 101, 173-188.
  13. Gjesme, T. (1981). Is there any future in achievement motivation? Motivation and Emotion, 2, 115-138.
  14. Gjesme, T. (1983). On the con