Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 69

How much overlap between traditional and cyberbullying in Turkish adolescents?

Okul ortamı ve sanal ortamda meydana gelen akran zorbalığı ne ölçüde örtüşüyor?

Pages
81–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that 31.9% of the adolescents have involved in traditional bullying and 21.7 % of them have involved in cyberbullying.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relation between involvement in traditional and cyberbullying and the potential overlap in traditional and cyberbullying among early and middle adolescents were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 868 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 completed a self-report questionnaire designed to assess; adolescents' usage pattern of information and communication technologies, their experiences for being a bully and a victim both in school and cyber environments on a 4-point Likert type scale (Traditional and Cyberbullying Inventory).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that 31.9% of the adolescents have involved in traditional bullying and 21.7 % of them have involved in cyberbullying.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the relation between involvement in traditional and cyberbullying and the potential overlap in traditional and cyberbullying among early and middle adolescents were examined. A total of 868 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 completed a self-report questionnaire designed to assess; adolescents' usage pattern of information and communication technologies, their experiences for being a bully and a victim both in school and cyber environments on a 4-point Likert type scale (Traditional and Cyberbullying Inventory). Results show that 31.9% of the adolescents have involved in traditional bullying and 21.7 % of them have involved in cyberbullying. While males are more likely to be cyberbullies than females, gender is not significant for being cyberbullied. Secondary school adolescents are more likely to report being cyberbullied in general. Adolescents' roles in traditional bullying predicted the same role in cyberbullying. It is found that 63 % overlap between bullying in school grounds and cyber environments. There is a significant relationship between the behavior damaging social relations in school grounds and being involved in cyberbullying.

Özet

Araştırmada, ergenliğin ilk ve orta dönemini temsil eden yaş grubunda okulda ve sanal ortamda gerçekleşen zorbalık türleri arasındaki ilişkiler ve bu iki tür zorbalığın ne ölçüde örtüştüğü incelenmiştir. Araştırma, ilköğretim ikinci kademe ve liseye devam eden yaşları 12 ile 18 arasında değişen 868 ergenle yürütülmüştür. Ergenlere cep telefonu, bilgisayar ve internet kullanım olanakları ve bu araçları kullanım özelliklerini belirlemeye yönelik sorular sorulmuş, ergenlerin ne sıklıkla geleneksel ve sanal zorbalık tanımı içinde yer alan davranışlar uyguladıkları ve maruz kaldıklarını incelemek için Geleneksel Akran Zorbalığı Ölçeği ve Sanal Zorbalık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Ergenlerin % 31.9'unun okulda, % 21.7'sinin sanal ortamda zorba, kurban ve zorba/kurban olarak akran zorbalığına dâhil olduğu, erkeklerin sanal ortamda zorbalık davranışlarını kızlara göre daha fazla sergiledikleri, erken ergenlik dönemindeki-lerin elektronik ortamda zorbalığa maruz kalma açısından daha fazla risk altında oldukları görülmektedir. Geleneksel zorba, kurban ve zorba/kurban statülerinde yer almanın sanal zorbalıkta aynı statülerde yer almayı anlamlı olarak yordadığı bulunmuştur. Geleneksel ve sanal zorbalık arasında % 63 'lük bir örtüşme olduğu, ilişkisel zorbalığa maruz kalma ile sanal ortamda zorbalığa maruz kalma ve sosyal dışlama yoluyla zorbalık yapma ile sanal ortamda zorbalık uygulama arasında bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BURNUKARA, P., UÇANOK, Z. (2012). How much overlap between traditional and cyberbullying in Turkish adolescents?. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 69, 81–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/357576

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Ancak, O. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167-184.
  2. Bayraktar, F. (2001). Internet kullanımının ergen gelişimindeki rolü. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ege Üniversitesi,
  3. İzmir.
  4. Beran, T. ve Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old behavior. Journal of Educational Commuting Research, 32(3), 265-277.
  5. Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90-126.
  6. Bjorkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30(3-4), 177-188.
  7. Bjorkqvist K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J. ve Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends regarding direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117-127.
  8. Blair, J. (2003). New breed of bullies torment their peers on the Internet. Education Week, 22(21), 6-9.
  9. Boulton, M. J. ve Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73-87.
  10. Burnukara, P. (2009). İlk ve orta ergenlikte geleneksel ve sanal akran zorbalığına ilişkin betimsel bir inceleme. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  11. Ankara.
  12. Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 15, 68-76.
  13. Caspi, A. ve Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation and emotion. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9( 1), 54-59.
  14. Crick, N. R. ve Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
  15. Dehue F., Bolman, C. ve Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters' experiences and parental perception. Cy-berPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217-223.
  16. Dölek, N. (2002). Öğrencilerde zorbaca davranışların araştırılması ve bir önleyici program modeli. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi,
  17. İstanbul.
  18. Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2009). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media and Society, 11(8), 1-19.
  19. Erdur-Baker, Ö. ve Kavşut F. (2007). Akran zorbalığının yeni yüzü: Siber zorbalık. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 27, 31-42.
  20. Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J. ve Wolak, J. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the nation's youth. Alexandria, VA: National Center