Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 70

Do developmental relationships between theory of mind, language, working memory, and executive functions show differences across early (36-48 months) and late (53-72 months) age groups?

Zihin kuramı ile çalışma belleği, dil becerisi ve yönetici işlevler arasındaki bağlantılar küçük (36-48 ay) ve büyük (53-72 ay) çocuklarda farklılık gösterebilir mi?

Pages
1–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For theory of mind model of 5-year-olds, the causal relations between theory of mind and language are direct and positive without the mediation of working memory or executive functions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the developmental relations between theory of mind, language, working memory and executive functions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two false belief tasks and one appearance-reality task were used to measure theory of mind in this study in which a hundred 36-48 months old and a hundred and one 53-72 months old children participated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For theory of mind model of 5-year-olds, the causal relations between theory of mind and language are direct and positive without the mediation of working memory or executive functions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the developmental relations between theory of mind, language, working memory and executive functions. It was also designed to examine direct relations as well as mediation variables to suggest a theory of mind model. Two false belief tasks and one appearance-reality task were used to measure theory of mind in this study in which a hundred 36-48 months old and a hundred and one 53-72 months old children participated. Beside the measures of theory of mind; language, working memory and executive functions were measured by backward digit span, the Turkish Edition of Test of Early Language Development-Third Edition (TELD-3) and the Dimensional Change Card Sort, respectively. The results of structural equation modeling confirmed different relations between theory of mind, working memory, language and executive functions for three and five year olds. For the theory of mind model of 3-year-olds, a significant proportion of variance in theory of mind is accounted for working memory above language and executive functions. On the contrary, for the theory of mind model of 5-year-olds, a significant proportion of variance in theory of mind is accounted for language above working memory and executive functions. Also for theory of mind model of 3-year-olds, the causal relations between theory of mind and working memory are direct and positive without the mediation of language or executive functions. For theory of mind model of 5-year-olds, the causal relations between theory of mind and language are direct and positive without the mediation of working memory or executive functions.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı zihin kuramı, dil, çalışma belleği ve yönetici işlevler arasındaki bağlantıları gelişimsel olarak incelemektir. Çalışmanın diğer bir amacı ise bu değişkenlerin arasındaki doğrudan ve dolaylı ilişkileri aydınlatarak bir zihin kuramı modeli geliştirilmesini sağlamaktır. Örneklemi 36-48 aylık 100 ve 53-72 aylık 101 olmak üzere toplam 201 çocuktan oluşan bu çalışmada, zihin kuramının ölçümünde iki yanlış kanı atfı testi ve bir görünüş gerçeklik testi uygulanmıştır. Zihin kuramı ölçümlerinin yanı sıra çalışma belleği gelişiminin ölçümünde ters sayı dizisi ve dil gelişiminin ölçümünde Türkçe Erken Dil Gelişim Testi (TEDİL) ve yönetici işlevlerin ölçümünde Boyut Değiştirerek Kart Eşleme Görevi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan yapısal eşitlik modellemesinin sonuçlarına göre üç yaşta zihin kuramı, dil ve çalışma belleği arasındaki ilişki örüntülerinin beş yaştan farklı olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Üç yaşlarında zihin kuramı becerisinde çalışma belleğinin, 5 yaşlarında ise dilin yordayıcı rolünün diğer değişkenlerden daha büyük olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca üç yaşlarında çalışma belleği, dil becerisinin veya yönetici işlevlerin aracı rolü olmaksızın zihin kuramını doğrudan ve pozitif yönde yordamaktadır. Beş yaşlarında ise çalışma belleğinin veya yönetici işlevlerin aracı rolü olmaksızın dil becerisinin zihin kuramını doğrudan ve pozitif yönde yordadadığı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKELLE, Ş. S., YAŞAR, Z. E. (2012). Do developmental relationships between theory of mind, language, working memory, and executive functions show differences across early (36-48 months) and late (53-72 months) age groups?. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 70, 1–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/357561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alloway, T. A. vc Gathercole, S. E. ve Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they seperahle? Child Development, 77, 1698-1716.
  2. Astington, J. W. ve Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal sludy of the relation between language and theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology. 55, 1311-1320.
  3. Astington, J. W„ Pelletiera, J. vc Homer, B. (2002). Theory of mind and epislcmological development: The relation between children's sccond-order false-belief understanding and their ability to reason about evidence. New Ideas in Psychology. 20, 131-144.
  4. Astington, J. W. ve Baird. J. A. (2005). Introduction: Why language matters. J. W. Astington vc J. A. Baird. (Ed.). Why language matters for theory of mind içinde (3-25). New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Baron-C'ohcn, S., Leslie, A. M. vc Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind*? Cognition. 21, 37-46.
  6. Bulduk, S. (2008). Yeni başlayanlar için psikolojide deneysel araştırma yöntemleri (2. baskı). Çantay Kitapevi. Carlson, S. M. Moses, L. J. ve Breton, C. (2002) How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development. II, 73-92.
  7. Carlson. S. M., Mandcll, D. J ve Williams L. (2004). Executive Junction and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology. 40, 1105-1122.
  8. Cutting, A. L. ve Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development. 70, 853-865. de Villicrs J. G. ve de Villiers, P. A. (2000). Linguistic determinism and the understanding of fulse beliefs. P. Mitchcll ve K. J. Riggs, (Ed.), Children's reasoning and the mind içinde (191-228).
  9. Hove, England: Psychology Press/Taylor vc Francis (UK). de Villiers, J. G. (2005). The role of language in theory of mind development: What deaf children tell us. J. W. Astington ve J. A. Baird, (Ed.), Why language matters for theory of mind içinde (266-297). New York: Oxford University fress. Deak, G. O. Ray, D. S. ve Brenneman. K. (2003). Children pcr-sevcrative appearence-reality errors arc related to emerging language skills. Child Development. 74, 944-964.
  10. Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R. ve Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the appearance-reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology. 15,95-120.
  11. Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children's knowl