SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 71

The relationships of contextual performance with person-organization fit, perceived organizational prestige and organizational identity strength: The mediating role of organizational commitment

Örgüt kimliğinin gücü, algılanan örgütsel prestij ve kişi-örgüt uyumu ile bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişkiler: Örgütsel bağlılığın aracı rolü

Hatem ÖCEL
Pages
37–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of regression analyses using data collected from 190 academic staff in Karabük University showed that affective and normative commitment has an intermediary role in the relationship between person-organization fit, organizational identity strength, perceived organizational prestige and contextual performance while the same results also showed that there is no intermediary role of continuance commitment in this relationship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was carried out to examine the mediating role of organizational commitment (affective, normative and continuance) on the relationship between person-organization fit. perceived organizational prestige and organizational identity strength and organizational commitment of the employees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study was carried out to examine the mediating role of organizational commitment (affective, normative and continuance) on the relationship between person-organization fit. perceived organizational prestige and organizational identity strength and organizational commitment of the employees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of regression analyses using data collected from 190 academic staff in Karabük University showed that affective and normative commitment has an intermediary role in the relationship between person-organization fit, organizational identity strength, perceived organizational prestige and contextual performance while the same results also showed that there is no intermediary role of continuance commitment in this relationship.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study was carried out to examine the mediating role of organizational commitment (affective, normative and continuance) on the relationship between person-organization fit. perceived organizational prestige and organizational identity strength and organizational commitment of the employees. The results of regression analyses using data collected from 190 academic staff in Karabük University showed that affective and normative commitment has an intermediary role in the relationship between person-organization fit, organizational identity strength, perceived organizational prestige and contextual performance while the same results also showed that there is no intermediary role of continuance commitment in this relationship.

Özet

Bu araştırma kişi-örgüt uyumu, örgüt kimliğinin gücü ve algılanan örgütsel prestij ile bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişkilerde örgütsel bağlılığın alt boyutları olan duygusal bağlılık, devamlılık bağlılığı ve normatif bağlılığın aracı rolünü bir üniversite ömekleminde incelemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmaya Karabük Üniversitesinde çalışan 190 akademik personel katılmıştır. Araştırmanın yordayıcı değişkenleri ile yordanan değişkeni arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel bağlılığın alt boyutlarının aracı rolünü incelemek amacıyla üç ayrı hiyerarşik regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar duygusal bağlılık ve normatif bağlılığın kişi-örgüt uyumu, örgüt kimliğinin gücü ve algılanan örgütsel prestij ile bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişkide aracı rol oynadığını ancak devamlılık bağlılığının ise böyle bir aracı rolünün olmadığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖCEL, H. (2013). The relationships of contextual performance with person-organization fit, perceived organizational prestige and organizational identity strength: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 71, 37–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/357557

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abrams, D., Ando, K. ve Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers' turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 24( 10), 1027-1040.
  2. Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, P. (1990), The measurement ve antecedents of affective, continuance vc normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
  3. Albert. S. ve Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
  4. Amos, E. A. ve Weathington, B. L. (2008). An analysis of the relation between employee-organization value congruence and employee attitudes. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142, 615-632.
  5. Arthur, W. Jr., Bell, S. T., Doverspike, D. ve Villado, A. J. (2006). The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: An assessment of its criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 786-801.
  6. Ashfort. B. E. ve Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and organization. Academy and Management Review. 14( 1), 20-39. Ashfort. B. E., ve Mael, F. A. (1996). Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 19-64.
  7. Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  8. Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology. 66, 32-42.
  9. Bergman, M. E. (2006). The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 645-663.
  10. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Bowling, N. A. (2010). Effects of job satisfaction and conscientiousness on extra-role behaviors. Journal of Bussiness Psychology, 25, 119-130.
  11. Brief, A. F. ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
  12. Borman, W. C. ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. N. Schmit ve W. C. Borman, (Ed.), Personal selection in organizations içinde. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. Cable, D. vc Judge, T. A. (1996). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applie