SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 77

Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İş Doyumu İlişkisinin Meta Analiz Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi

İLKSUN DİDEM ÜLBEĞİ
AZMİ YALÇIN
Pages
80–103
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed strong correlations between organizational commitment-job satisfaction, affective commitment-job satisfaction, and normative commitment-job satisfaction relationships, and a weak correlation between continuance commitment and job satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this meta-analysis, the relationship between organizational commitment and job satisfaction was examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effect sizes were calculated from 68 studies (N = 15108).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed strong correlations between organizational commitment-job satisfaction, affective commitment-job satisfaction, and normative commitment-job satisfaction relationships, and a weak correlation between continuance commitment and job satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this meta-analysis, the relationship between organizational commitment and job satisfaction was examined. The effect sizes were calculated from 68 studies (N = 15108). Results showed strong correlations between organizational commitment-job satisfaction, affective commitment-job satisfaction, and normative commitment-job satisfaction relationships, and a weak correlation between continuance commitment and job satisfaction. Moderator analyses showed that organizational commitment scale, age and publication bias were moderator variables in affective commitment-job satisfaction relationship, and age moderated the relationship between normative commitment and job satisfaction.

Özet

Bu meta analiz çalışmasında örgütsel bağlılık ile iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkiler ele alınmaktadır. Toplam 68 çalışmadan (N = 15108) elde edilen etki büyüklükleri hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular örgütsel bağlılık-iş doyumu, duygusal bağlılık-iş doyumu ve normatif bağlılık-iş doyumu arasında yüksek düzeyde, devam bağlılığı ile iş doyumu arasında ise zayıf düzeyde ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Düzenleyici değişken analizleri, duygusal bağlılık ile iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel bağlılık ölçeğinin, yaşın ve yayın yanlılığının, normatif bağlılık ile iş doyumu ilişkisinde ise yaşın düzenleyici etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜLBEĞİ, İ. D., YALÇIN, A. (2016). Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İş Doyumu İlişkisinin Meta Analiz Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 77, 80–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/357535

References (12)

  1. Akar, C. ve Yıldırım, Y. T. (2008). Yöneticilerin örgütsel bağ- lılık, iş tatmini ve rol stres kaynakları arasındaki ilişkiler: Yapısal denklem modeliyle beyaz et sektöründe bir alan uygulaması. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 97-113.
  2. Allen, N. J. ve Meyer J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  3. Arthur, W., Bennett, W. ve Huffcutt, A. I. (2001). Conducting meta-analysis using SAS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Bateman, T. S. ve Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 95-112.
  4. Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making? Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232-244.
  5. Becker, T. E. ve Billings, R. S. (1993). Profiles of commitment: An empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 177-190.
  6. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M. ve Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 464-482.
  7. Becker, T. E., Klein, H. J. ve Meyer, J. P. (2009). Commitment in Organizations: Accumulated Wisdom and New Directions. H. J. Klein, T. E. Becker ve J. P. Meyer, (Ed.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions içinde (419-452). NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Begg, C. B. ve Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088-1101.
  8. Bentein, K., Stinglhamber, F. ve Vandenberghe, C. (2002). Organization-, supervisor-, and workgroup-directed commitments and citizenship behaviours: A comparison of models. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 341-362.
  9. Bentein, K., Vandenberg, R. J., Vandenberghe, C. ve Stinglhamber, F. (2005). The role of chnage in the relaitonship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 468-482.
  10. Bluedorn, A. C. (1982). A unified model of turnover from organizations. Human Relations, 35, 135-153.
  11. Bowling, N. A. (2014). Job satisfaction, motivation, and performance. M. C. W. Peters, J. de Jong ve T. W. Taris, (Ed.), An introduction to contemporary work psychology içinde (321-341).
  12. Chicester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Brief, A. P. (1998). Attitudes in and around organizations. Thousand Oaks