SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 0

The Effect of Team Collectivism on Performance and Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Peer Procedural Justice

Takım Kolektivizminin Performans ve Vatandaşlık Davranışına Etkisi: Takım Arkadaşı İşlem Adaletinin Aracılık Rolü

Arzu SERT ÖZEN
Meral ELÇİ
Pages
71–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that team collectivism was positively related to peer procedural justice, team citizenship behavior, and team task performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to test the effects of team collectivism on team citizenship behavior and team task performance and examine whether peer procedural justice had a mediating role in the relationships of team collectivism with team citizenship behavior and team task performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research design was based on survey data collected from 560 employees in 93 production and service teams from companies located in Istanbul, Izmir, Kocaeli, and Mersin provinces in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that team collectivism was positively related to peer procedural justice, team citizenship behavior, and team task performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to test the effects of team collectivism on team citizenship behavior and team task performance and examine whether peer procedural justice had a mediating role in the relationships of team collectivism with team citizenship behavior and team task performance. The research design was based on survey data collected from 560 employees in 93 production and service teams from companies located in Istanbul, Izmir, Kocaeli, and Mersin provinces in Turkey. The hypotheses in the model were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Since the theoretical level is team, all the structures involved in the research were conceptualized at the team level. The results showed that team collectivism was positively related to peer procedural justice, team citizenship behavior, and team task performance. Additionally, it was found that peer procedural justice had a partial mediating role in the relationships of team collectivism with team citizenship behavior and team task performance.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, takım kolektivizmi inancının, takım vatandaşlık davranışı ile takım görev performansı üzerindeki etkisini test etmek ve bu ilişkide takım arkadaşı işlem adaletinin aracı rolünün bulunup bulunmadığını incelemektir. Bu araştırma, İstanbul, İzmir, Kocaeli ve Mersin illerinde faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin üretim ve hizmettakımlarında görev alan 560 kişi (N = 93 takım) üzerinde kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (PLSYEM) kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Kuram düzeyi takım olduğundan dolayı araştırmaya dâhil olan bütün yapılar takımdüzeyinde kavramsallaştırılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, takım kolektivizmi inancının hem takım arkadaşı işlem adaleti hem de takım görev performansı ile takım vatandaşlık davranışı üzerinde anlamlı etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Buna ek olarak, takım kolektivizmi inancı ile takım görev performansı ve takım vatandaşlık davranışıarasındaki ilişkide takım arkadaşı işlem adaletinin kısmi aracılık etkisi olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEN, A. S., ELÇİ, M. (2019). The Effect of Team Collectivism on Performance and Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Peer Procedural Justice. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 0, 71–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/357504

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ambrose, M. L. ve Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 491-500.
  2. Bagozzi, R. P. ve Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  3. Baker, D. P. ve Salas, E. (1997). Principles for measuring teamwork: A summary and look toward the future. M. T. Brannick, E. Salas ve C. Prince (Ed.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications içinde (331-355).
  4. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Ball, G. A., Trevino, L. K. ve Sims, H. P. (1994). Just and unjust punishment: Influences on subordinate performance and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 299-322.
  5. Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595-615.
  6. Biemann, T., Cole, M. S. ve Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG (J) in leadership researchand some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1),66–80.
  7. Bliese, P. D. (1998).
  8. Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355-373.
  9. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. K. J. Klein ve S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (1. Baskı) içinde (349- 381). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass. Bond, M. H., Leung, K. ve Wan, K. C. (1982). How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward distribution. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13(2), 186-200.
  10. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  11. Brockner, J. ve Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 189-208.
  12. Burke, K. ve Leben, S. (2007). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient in public satisfaction. Court Review, 44(1-2), 4-25.
  13. Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L. ve Farh, J. L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3),