Journals / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Effects of Engaging Family in Addiction Treatment for Substance Use and Treatment Compliance: A Preliminary Study

Pages
229–233
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even with some limitations as a preliminary study, this research underlines the importance of family engagement in the course of the addiction treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This preliminary study aimed to examine how engaging the family in addiction treatment affects sub-stance use and treatment compliance in patients who applied to the Green Crescent Consultancy Cen-ter (YEDAM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using causal comparison model, 148 family members (mother, father, siblings, and/or spouse) of 214 patients with drug/alcohol addiction who applied to YEDAM between January 2016 and June 2017 participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even with some limitations as a preliminary study, this research underlines the importance of family engagement in the course of the addiction treatment.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This preliminary study aimed to examine how engaging the family in addiction treatment affects sub-stance use and treatment compliance in patients who applied to the Green Crescent Consultancy Cen-ter (YEDAM). Using causal comparison model, 148 family members (mother, father, siblings, and/or spouse) of 214 patients with drug/alcohol addiction who applied to YEDAM between January 2016 and June 2017 participated in the study. Self-reports of the individuals were taken into account in the evaluation of alcohol/substance use or non-use for people with addiction. Compliance with the treat-ment was measured in the form of the rates of retention and drop-out for each individual. Individuals whose families attended 2 or lesser sessions abstained from substance use at a rate of 24.8%, whereas this rate was found to be 41% when they attended 3 or more sessions. When the families attended 2 or fewer sessions, it did not have an effect on treatment drop-out. When families attended 3 or more sessions, the rate of continuing treatment was 2.3 times higher. As the number of sessions attended by the family members increased, the duration of not using substance increased. This also enhanced treatment compliance and decreased the rate of dropping out of treatment. Even with some limitations as a preliminary study, this research underlines the importance of family engagement in the course of the addiction treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHYAOĞLU, G., DİNÇ, M., IŞIK, S., ÖGEL, K. (2020). Effects of Engaging Family in Addiction Treatment for Substance Use and Treatment Compliance: A Preliminary Study. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 229–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/357275

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Barnard, M. (2006). Drug addiction and families. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  2. Brisby, T., Baker, S., & Hedderwick, T. (1997). Under the Influence: Coping with Parents who Drink Too Much: A Report on the Needs of the Children of Problem Drinking Parents. London: Alcohol Concern. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Choate, P. W. (2015). Adolescent Alcoholism and Drug Addiction: The Experience of Parents. Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 461-476. http:// doi.org/10.3390/bs5040461 [CrossRef] Copello, A. G., Copello, A. G., Velleman, R. D., & Templeton, L. J. (2005). Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems. Drug and alcohol review, 24(4), 369-385. https://doi. org/10.1080/09595230500302356 [CrossRef] Hashemi, T., Fotuhie-Bonab, S., & Bayrami, M. (2010). The role of irrational beliefs, self efficacy and social support in relapse of abuse disorder. Research on Addiction, 4(13), 7-24.
  4. Lander, L., Howsare, J., & Byrne, M. (2013). The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: From Theory to Practice. Social Work in Public Health, 28, 194-205. http://doi.org/10.1080/1937191 8.2013.759005 [CrossRef] Liddle, H. A., Dakof, G. A., Parker, K., Diamond, G. S., Barrett, K., & Tejeda, M. (2001). Multidimensional family therapy for adolescent drug abuse: Results of a randomized clinical trial. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 27(4), 651-688. [CrossRef] Lochman, J. E., & van den Steenhoven, A. (2002). Family-based approaches to substance abuse prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 23(1), 49-114. [CrossRef] Marlowe, D. B., Merikle, E. P., Kirby, K. C., Festinger, D. S., & McLellan, A. T. (2001). Multidimensional assessment of perceived treatment- entry pressures among substance abusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 97. [CrossRef] McGillicuddy, N. B., Rychtarik, R. G., Duquette, J. A., & Morsheimer, E. T. (2001). Development of a skill training program for parents of substance-abusing adolescents. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 20(1), 59-68. [CrossRef] Orford, J. (1994). Empowering family and friends: a new approach to the secondary prevention of addiction. Drug and alcohol review, 13(4), 417-429. [CrossRef] Ozechowski, T. J., & Liddle, H. A. (2000). Family-based therapy for adolescent drug abuse: Knowns and unknowns. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3(4), 269-298. [CrossRef] Ögel, K., K