Journals / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Relationship among Smoking Addiction, Psychological Flexibility, and Impulsivity in University Students

Pages
16–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Psychological flexibility and impulsivity have a say in the development or continuation of addiction and are critical in the fight against addiction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between psychological flexibility and impulsivity levels with nicotine addiction levels, in university students who are addicted to cigarettes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the study consisted of 546 undergraduate students, including 294 non-smokers and 252 smokers, who were addicted to tobacco according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria and who were studying at the Hamidiye Health Sciences University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Psychological flexibility and impulsivity have a say in the development or continuation of addiction and are critical in the fight against addiction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between psychological flexibility and impulsivity levels with nicotine addiction levels, in university students who are addicted to cigarettes. The population of the study consisted of 546 undergraduate students, including 294 non-smokers and 252 smokers, who were addicted to tobacco according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria and who were studying at the Hamidiye Health Sciences University. The Psychological Flexibility Scale (PFS) and Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS) were applied to students who were smokers and non-smokers; and in addition, the Fagerström Nicotine Dependence Test (FNDT) was applied to the smokers. The students with nicotine dependence were compared with the non-addicted group; and values (32.4±8.0 vs. 54.5±11.3; p<0.001), presentability (20.8±6.0 vs. 33.7±6.4; p<0.001), acceptance (13.7±4.1 vs. 26.3±4.1; p<0.001), contextual self (8.6 ± 2.8 vs. 13.2±4.3; p<0.001), disintegration (8.9±2.9 vs. 12.7±4.2; p<0.001) subscale scores, and PFS total score (84.7±15.8 vs. 140.6±21.4; p<0.001) were found to be significantly lower; whereas attention impulsivity (19.5±4.2 vs. 15.5±3.2; p<0.001), motor impulsivity (26.4±5.4 vs.18.3±3.9; p<0.001), and the non-planning (30.4±3.1 vs. 17.0±2.1; p<0.001) subscales scores of BIS and BIS total score (76.3±11.0 vs. 52.5±7.4, p<0.001) were found to be significantly higher. In addition, a significant positive relationship was found between the FNDT scores of the participants in the smoking group and the BIS subscale with total scores (r=0.330, p<0.001; r=0.2.77, p<0.001; r=0.222, p<0.001; r=0.330, p<0.001; respectively). Psychological flexibility and impulsivity have a say in the development or continuation of addiction and are critical in the fight against addiction.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖĞÜTLÜ, L., GÖKTAŞ, S. Ş. (2021). Relationship among Smoking Addiction, Psychological Flexibility, and Impulsivity in University Students. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 16–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/357266

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Cai, L., Cui, W., You, D., He, J., & Zhao, K. (2015). Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence in rural southwest China. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-6. [Crossref] Ciarrochi, J., Bilich, L., & Godsell, C. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a mechanism of change in acceptance and commitment therapy. Assessing mindfulness and acceptance processes in clients: Illuminating the theory and practice of change, 51-75.
  2. Cakici, E., Cakici, M., Eş, A., & Ergün, D. (2014). The prevalence and risk factors of substance use among university students in Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 15(2), 108-115. [Crossref] Dani, J. A., & Heinemann, S. (1996). Molecular and cellular aspects of nicotine abuse. Neuron, 16(5), 905-908. [Crossref] Doran, N., Cook, J., McChargue, D., & Spring, B. (2009). Impulsivity and cigarette craving: differences across subtypes. Psychopharmacology, 207(3), 365-373.
  3. Doran, N., McChargue, D., & Cohen, L. (2007). Impulsivity and the reinforcing value of cigarette smoking. Addictive behaviors, 32(1), 90-98.
  4. Eren, M. (2018). Disiplin Cezası Alan ve Almayan Lise Öğrencilerinin Saldırganlık Empati Becerisi ve Anne-Baba Tutumları Açısından Değerlendirilmesi (Master’s thesis, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü). Evenden, J. L. (1999). Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology, 146(4), 348-361. [Crossref] Fagerstrom, K., Shneider, N.G. (1989). Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. J Behav Med, 12, 159-182. [Crossref] Farris, S. G., Zvolensky, M. J., Norton, P. J., Hogan, J., Smith, A. H., Talkovsky, A. M., et al. (2016). Smoking-specific experiential avoidance is indirectly associated with trait worry and smoking processes among treatment-seeking smokers. Behavioral Medicine, 42(4), 254- 263. [Crossref] Francis, A.W., Dawson, D.L., Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2016). The development and validation of the Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5, 134-145. [Crossref] Garey, L., Farris, S.G., Schmidt, N.B., Zvolensky, M.J. (2016). The role of smoking specific experiential avoidance in the relation between perceived stress and tobacco dependence, perceived barrier stocessation, and problems during quit attempts among treatment-seeking smokers. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(1), 58-63. [Crossref] Gerçek, Ç., Gümüş, G., Demi̇r, S., Den