SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Sociology of mental health and disorders

Ruh sağlığı ve bozukluklarının sosyolojisi

Orhan DOĞAN
Faruk KOCACIK
Pages
109–120
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This cooperation is necessary for development as a scientific discipline of social psychiatry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Psychiatry and psychiatric disorders are closely related with social sciences through epidemiologic and etiologic characteristics of psychiatric disorders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sociologists have been determined five basic views about mental health and disorders: Social causation, societal reaction, critical theory, social constructivism, and social realism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This cooperation is necessary for development as a scientific discipline of social psychiatry.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyoloji · Akıl sağlığı · Zihinsel bozukluklar

Abstract

Psychiatry and psychiatric disorders are closely related with social sciences through epidemiologic and etiologic characteristics of psychiatric disorders. Sociologists have been determined five basic views about mental health and disorders: Social causation, societal reaction, critical theory, social constructivism, and social realism. Sociology consists of social class, gender, age, race and ethnicity, ethical issues, the characteristics of psychiatric therapies, hospitals, and professions. In the last two decades, it could not realize the cooperation between psychiatry and sociology because of psychiatry turn to biomedical model from biopsychosocial model. This cooperation is necessary for development as a scientific discipline of social psychiatry.

Özet

Psikiyatri ve psikiyatrik bozukluklar, epidemiyolojik ve etiyolojik özellikleri yönünden sosyal bilimlerle yakından ilişkilidir. Sosyologlar ruh sağlığı ve bozuklukları konusunda beş temel bakış açısı belirlemiştir: Sosyal nedensellik, sosyal tepki, eleştirel kuram, sosyal yapısalcılık, sosyal gerçeklik. Sosyolojinin ilgi alanına sosyal sınıf, cinsiyet, yaş, ırk ve etnisite, psikiyatrik tedavilerin özellikleri, etik konular, hastaneler ve mesleklerin özellikleri girer. Son 20 yılda psikiyatri biyopsi kososyal modelden biyomedikal modele yöneldiği için, psikiyatri ve sosyoloji arasında beklenen işbirliği kurulamamıştır. Oysa sosyal psikiyatrinin bir bilimsel disiplin olarak gelişmesi için bu işbirliği gereklidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, O., KOCACIK, F. (2006). Sociology of mental health and disorders. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 109–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/356237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Bloom SW. The relevance of medical sociology to psychiatry: a historical view. J Nşrv Merit Dis 2005; 193:77-84
  2. House JS. Understanding social factors and inequalities in health: 20th century prospects. J Health Soc Behav 2002; 43:125-142
  3. Pilgrim D, Rogers A. The troubled relationship between psychiatry and sociology. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2005; 51:228-241
  4. Angermeyer MC, Kluge H, Riedel-Heller SG, Roick C. Social psychiatry without sociology. Analysis of a scientific journal. Psychiatr Prax 2004; 31:420-424
  5. Pilgrim D, Rogers A. A Sociology and Mental Health and Illness. İkinci baskı, Trowbridge, Redwood Books, 1999
  6. Lees S. How lay is lay? Chinese students' perceptions of anorexia nervosa in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44:491-502
  7. Castel F, Castel R, Lowell A.' The Psychiatric Society. New York, Free Press, 1979
  8. Field Institute. In Pursuit of Wellness: A Survey of California Adults. Sacramento, California Depart- ment of Mental Health, 1984
  9. DYG Corporation. Public Attitudes toward People with Chronic Mental Illness. Elmsford,.NY DYG Corporation, 1990
  10. Ryle A. Cognitive-Analytical Therapy: Active Participation in Change. Chichester, Wiley, 1990
  11. Wallece RA, Wolf A. Contemporary Sociological Theory. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1999
  12. Scott J. Sociological Theory: Contemporary Debates. Aldershot, Edward Elgar, 1995
  13. Layder D, Understanding Social Theory. London, Sage Publication, 1995
  14. Beckeı H. Through Values to Social Interpretation. Durham, Duke University Press, 1950
  15. Horkheimer M. Critical Theory-Selected Essays. New York, Continuum Pub., 1999
  16. Bryant C, Jary D. Giddens' Theory of Structuralizm, A Critical Appreciation. London, Routledge, 1991
  17. Brown P. Naming and framing: the social construction of diagnosis and illness. J Health Soc Behav 1995; Extra lssue:34-52
  18. Horwitz AV. Outcomes in the sociology of mental health and illness: where have we been and where are we going? J Health Soc Behav 2002; 43:143-151
  19. Bartley M, Blane.D, Davey-Smith G. Beyond the Black Report. Sociol Health Illness 1998; 20:563-577
  20. Power C, Matthews S, Manof O. Inequalities in self-related health in the 1958 birth cohort - lifetime social circumstances or social mobility? BMJ 1996; 313:449-453
  21. Illsley R. Social class, selection and class differrences in relation to stillbirths an infant death. BMJ 1986; 229:1520-1524
  22. Pilgrim D. Psychotherapy and Society. London, Sage, 1997
  23. Page S. Gender a