Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

The effects of lactated ringer and HES solutions in differing combinations to prevent hypotension due to spinal anesthesia

Spinal anestezideki hipotansiyonun önlenmesinde, farklı zaman ve kombinasyonlarda uygulanan ringer laktat ve HES solüsyonlarının etkileri

Pages
103–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: While significant correlation was found between spinal block level and the incidence of spinal hypotension, no difference was observed regarding the type, dosage, and timing of loading solutions before spinal anaesthesia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of preloading with crystalloid and colloid fluids on hypotension following spinal anaesthesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group I: Lactated Ringer (LR) 1000 mL 30 minutes before spinal anaesthesia, Group II: HES %6 500 mL solution before the procedure, Group III: 500 mL RL before and HES %6 250 mL within 15 minutes after the procedure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: While significant correlation was found between spinal block level and the incidence of spinal hypotension, no difference was observed regarding the type, dosage, and timing of loading solutions before spinal anaesthesia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anestezi · spinal · İzotonik solüsyonlar

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of preloading with crystalloid and colloid fluids on hypotension following spinal anaesthesia. Method: One hundred ASA Class I-II patients were randomly assigned to the study and divided into five groups. Group I: Lactated Ringer (LR) 1000 mL 30 minutes before spinal anaesthesia, Group II: HES %6 500 mL solution before the procedure, Group III: 500 mL RL before and HES %6 250 mL within 15 minutes after the procedure. Group IV and Group V received RL 500 mL + 500 RL mL, and HES %6 250 mL + HES %6 250 mL respectively, using the same timing protocol. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures and heart rates were measured at 1 minute intervals in the first 20 minutes and then every 5 minutes. Results: With the exception of the differences in diastolic blood pressures at the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th minutes, there was no difference in arterial blood pressures and heart rates between Group HI and IV or Group TV and V. Conclusion: While significant correlation was found between spinal block level and the incidence of spinal hypotension, no difference was observed regarding the type, dosage, and timing of loading solutions before spinal anaesthesia.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, spinal anesteziye bağlı hipotansiyonu önlenmek için kullanılan kristaloid ve kolloid sıvılar ile, bu sıvıların farklı uygulama zamanlarının etkinliğinin araştırılması amaçlandı. Yöntem: Çalışmaya alınan ASA I-II grubu 100 hasta, beş gruba ayrıldı. Grup I'e spinal anesteziden önceki 30 dk içinde 1000 mL Ringer laktat (RL), Grup II'ye 500 mL %6 HES, Grup III'e spinal anesteziden önceki 15 dk içinde 500 mL RL ve spinal anesteziden sonraki ilk 15 dk içinde 250 mL %6 HES, Grup IV'e ve Grup Ve aynı periyodlarda sırası ile 500'mLRL + 500 mL RL, ve 250 mL %6 HES + 250 mL %6 HES uygulandı. İlk 20 dakika boyunca her dakika, daha sonra 5 dakikada bir sistolik, diyastolik, ortalama arter basınçları ve kalp atım hızları kaydedildi. Spinal uygulamadan sonraki 5., 10. ve 15. dakikalardaki duyusal blok seviyeleri tesbit edildi. Bulgular: Grup III ve IV ile grup IVveVarasında 2., 3. ve 5. dakikalardaki diyastolik arter basınçları dışında arter basınçları ve kalp atım hızları açısından fark gözlenmedi. Sonuç: Spinal anestezi sonrası hipotansiyon oluşumunda blok seviyesinin önemli olduğu, spinal anestezi öncesi kullanılan sıvıların niteliği, miktarı ve uygulama zamanı açısından bir fark olmadığı sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, Ş., SARI, F., APAN, A., BAŞAR, H. (2006). The effects of lactated ringer and HES solutions in differing combinations to prevent hypotension due to spinal anesthesia. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 103–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/355249

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Carpenter RL, Çaplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 906-16
  2. Caplan RA, Ward RJ, Posner K, Cheney FW. Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 5-11
  3. Wollman SB, Marx GF. Acute hydration for prevention of hypotension of spinal anesthesia in parturients. Anesthesiology 1968; 29: 374-80
  4. Marx GF, Cosmi EV, Wollman SB. Biochemical status and clinical condition of mother and infant at cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1969; 48: 986-94
  5. Critchley LA. Hypotension, subarachnoid block and the elderly patient. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1139-43
  6. MacLennan FM, MacDonald AF, Campbell DM. Lung water during the puerperium. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 141-7
  7. Riley ET, Cohen SE, Rubenstein AJ, Flanagan B. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for cesarean section: six percent hetastarch versus lactated Ringer's solution. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:838-42
  8. Rout CC, Akoojee SS, Rocke DA, Gouws E. Rapid administration of crystalloid preload does not decrease the incidence of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section. Br JAnaesth 1992; 68: 394-7
  9. Mojica JL, Melendez HJ, Bautista LE. The timing of intravenous crystalloid administration and incidence of cardiovascular side effects during spinal anesthesia: the results from a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 432-7
  10. Hartmann B, Junger A, Klasen J, ve ark. The incidence and risk factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia induction: an analysis with automated data collection. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1521-9
  11. Klasen J, Junger A, Hartmann B, ve ark. Differing incidences of relevant hypotension with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1491-5
  12. Vaghadia H, McLeod DH, Mitchell GW, Merrick PM, Chilvers CR. Small-dose hypobaric lidocaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for short duration outpatient laparoscopy. I. A randomized comparison with conventional dose hyperbaric lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 59-64
  13. Rawal N, Schollin J, Wesstrom G. Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 32: 61-6
  14. Casati A, Aldegheri G, Vinciguerra F, Marsan A, Fraschini G, Torri G. Randomized comparison between sevoflurane anaesthesia and unilateral spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing