SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Green areas in the Ayasofya District (Nâhiye) according to the cadastral survey (tapu tahrir) registers of Istanbul waqfs 1546 and 1600

Emine ÇOBAN ŞAHİN
Pages
31–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the distributionof the green areas in the quarters, their density and location, and the reasons forthe differences between the 1546 and the 1600 registers have been discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this paper is to explore the settlement plan and structure ofcharacteristics, components, continuity and changes of green areas mentionedin quarter (mahalle) units of the Ayasofya District (nâhiye) according to ‘TheCadastral Survey (Tapu Tahrir) Registers of Istanbul Waqfs dated 1546 and 1600’.In order to understand the green areas and make interpretations about them, itwas considered necessary to understand the urban characteristics and settlementpatterns of the Ayasofya District.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve this, the urban elements of theAyasofya District that may have affected the character of the green areas has beenresearched and compiled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the distributionof the green areas in the quarters, their density and location, and the reasons forthe differences between the 1546 and the 1600 registers have been discussed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this paper is to explore the settlement plan and structure ofcharacteristics, components, continuity and changes of green areas mentionedin quarter (mahalle) units of the Ayasofya District (nâhiye) according to ‘TheCadastral Survey (Tapu Tahrir) Registers of Istanbul Waqfs dated 1546 and 1600’.In order to understand the green areas and make interpretations about them, itwas considered necessary to understand the urban characteristics and settlementpatterns of the Ayasofya District. To achieve this, the urban elements of theAyasofya District that may have affected the character of the green areas has beenresearched and compiled. Then, maps were developed in the GIS (GeographicInformation System) program to understand the status of the city when the datesof the cadastral survey registers. Afterward, tables were prepared containing thesettlement characteristics, their green areas, and their components and numbers.Tables were compared to each other and to maps, and conclusions were drawn.Then, all data supported by visual and written sources related to the periodwere evaluated and interpreted considering the respective years that they wereregistered.As a result, the general settlement plan of the city and the status character of thegreen areas in the settled areas as well as the relationship of the green areas withthe structures they are attached to was determined. Furthermore, the distributionof the green areas in the quarters, their density and location, and the reasons forthe differences between the 1546 and the 1600 registers have been discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, E. Ç. (2020). Green areas in the Ayasofya District (Nâhiye) according to the cadastral survey (tapu tahrir) registers of Istanbul waqfs 1546 and 1600. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 31–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/354954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Ağır, A. (2009). İstanbul’un Eski Venedik Yerleşimi ve Dönüşümü. İstanbul: İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü. Altuğ, K. (2013). İstanbul’da Bizans Dönemi Sarnıçlarının Mimari Özellikleri ve Kentin Tarihsel Topografyasındaki Dağılımı. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation Thesis). İstanbul Technical University, Graduate School Of Science, Engineering And Technology, İstanbul.
  2. Arıkan, B. & Yıldırım, T. (2018).
  3. Paleoclimate, Geology, Geomorphology, and Middle Holocene Settlement Systems in the Delice Valley of North-Central Anatolia. Journal of Field Archaeology 43(8), 570-590.
  4. Aslanboğa, K. (2018). Osmanlı Devletinde Vakıf Yönetiminde Tevliyet: İstanbul Örneği. Journal of Administrative Sciences 16(32), 551-558.
  5. Atasoy, N. (2002).
  6. Hasbahçe, İstanbul:
  7. Aygaz. Ayverdi, E. H. (1958). Fatih Devri Sonlarında İstanbul Mahalleleri, Şehrin İskanı ve Nüfusu. Ankara:
  8. Doğuş. Ayverdi, İ. (2005). Misalli Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. İstanbul:
  9. Kubbealtı Neşriyatı. Barkan, Ö. L. & Ayverdi E. H. (1970). İstanbul Vakıfları Tahrir Defteri 953 (1546) Tarihli. İstanbul:
  10. Baha. Busbecq, O. G. (2013). Türk Mektupları Türk Mektupları-Kanuni Döneminde Avrupalı Bir Elçinin Gözlemleri (1555- 1560). Derin Türkömer (tr.). İstanbul:
  11. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür. Byzantion, S. (2019). Constantinople A Topographical Archaeological Historical Description. İstanbul:
  12. İstos. Canatar, M. (2004). İstanbul Vakıfları Tahrîr Defteri 1009 (1600) Tarihli. İstanbul:
  13. İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti Özal. Crane, H. (1987). Risale-i Mimariyye: An Early-Seventeenth-Century Ottoman Treatise on Architecture: Facsimile with Translation and Notes. Hollanda: Leiden. Cezar, M. (1963). Osmanlı Devrinde İstanbul Yapılarında Tahribat Yapan Yangınlar ve Tabii Afetler. İstanbul: İGSA Türk San’atı Tarihi Enstitüsü. Çeçen, K. (1999). İstanbul’ un Osmanlı Devri Su Yolları. İstanbul:
  14. Renk. Çeçen, K. (2002). Kırkçeşme Suları. In İslam Ansiklopedisi (Volume: 25, p. 476-479).
  15. Çokuğraş, I. (2013). İstanbul’da Marjinalite ve Mekân (1789-1839): Bekâr Odaları ve Meyhaneler. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation Thesis). Yıldız Technical University, Graduate School Of Science, Engineering And Technology, İstanbul.
  16. Devellioğlu, F. (2010). Osmanlıca- Türkçe Alfabetik Lügat. Ankara:
  17. Aydın. Dinç, H., Bölen, F. (2014). İstanbul Derelerinin Fiziki Yapısı. Journal of Planning 24(2), 107-120.
  18. Eyice, S. (2010). Tarih Çınarı Eski İstanbul’u Anlattı. [Hürriyet Newspaper Interview]. Retrieved from: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/ tarih-cinari-eski-istanbulu-anlat