Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Towards a critical delineation of waterfront: Aerial photographs as evidence and record in Istanbul

Pages
91–103
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With this gaze, this paper suggests a debunking of oppositions of land and sea space to reframe the waterfront as an urban edge in the process of urbanization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper develops a conceptual agenda and a critical cartographic methodology using aerial photographs to monitor the shaping of waterfront as a geography in Istanbul by humans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Viewing coastal unfixity through aerial photographs are argued here to provide two different temporalities: longue and court dureé which operate in the eventual and geological time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With this gaze, this paper suggests a debunking of oppositions of land and sea space to reframe the waterfront as an urban edge in the process of urbanization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This paper develops a conceptual agenda and a critical cartographic methodology using aerial photographs to monitor the shaping of waterfront as a geography in Istanbul by humans. Starting from the first aerial photographs of Istanbul until present, the gaze of the vertical dimension in geographical space holds divergent evidences of spatial transformation captured in aerial views. From construction sites to building of coastal roads, demolishing of port scapes and technological rifts of logistic flows, to large infills in longshore space; events and moments of spatial deformation of coastal space become visible and evident through aerial photography. Aerial gaze, when considered within an archeology of a developing military reconnaissance technology, is presented as an ironic tool to shed light to evidences and historical record of spatial transformation within an act of witnessing. Viewing coastal unfixity through aerial photographs are argued here to provide two different temporalities: longue and court dureé which operate in the eventual and geological time. As these photographs unveil, the material - geological body of the waterfront itself becomes the bearer of historical records of human and nonhuman relations that shape the coastal geography. The ground beneath is unfixed as it is pulled into a cartographic questioning tool of “critical delineation” of Istanbul’s waterfront. In the end, the waterfront is re-conceptualized and monitored as a dynamic geography. With this gaze, this paper suggests a debunking of oppositions of land and sea space to reframe the waterfront as an urban edge in the process of urbanization.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKILIÇ, G., AKPINAR, I. (2019). Towards a critical delineation of waterfront: Aerial photographs as evidence and record in Istanbul. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 91–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/354952

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akpınar, İ. (2003). The rebuilding of Istanbul after the plan of Henri Prost, 1937-1960 [microform]: from secularisation to Turkish modernisation. Doctoral thesis, University of London. Akpınar, I. (2017). “Urbanization Represented in the Historical Peninsula: Turkification of Istanbul in the 1950s”, in Mid-Century Modernism in Turkey, Architecture Across Cultures in the 1950s and 1960s, Meltem Ö. Gürel (ed.). New York: Routledge, 2015, pp. 56-84. ISBN-13: 978-1138806092 ISBN-10: 1138806099 Akpınar, İ (2014). The Rebuilding of Istanbul: The Role of Foreign Experts in the Urban Modernisation in the Early Republican Years. New Perspectives on Turkey. Baker, U. (2016). Beyin Ekran. İletişim Yayınları.
  2. Braudel, F. (1996). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Vol. 1 (Reprint ed). Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
  3. Brenner, N. (2014). Implosions- Explosions: Towards a Planetary Urbanization. Berlin: Jovis. Brenner, N. (2016). Critique of Urbanization: Selected Essays. Gütersloh: Basel: Blackwell Publishers.
  4. DeLanda, M. (2000). A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History. Zone Books. Deleuze, G. (2006). The Fold. A&C Black. Deriu, D. (2006). The Ascent of the Modern Planeur: Aerial Images and Urban Imaginary in the 1920’s. Imagining the City Vol. 1: The Art of Urban Living, Peter Lang Publishing. Deriu, D. (2007). Picturing Ruinscapes: The Aerial Photograph as Image of Historical Trauma, The Image and the Witness: Trauma, Memory and Visual Culture, Wallflower Press,
  5. Great Britain. Desfor, G., & Laidley, J. (2011). Changing Urban Waterfronts: A Fixity And flow Perspective. Portus Plus. Duranay, N. Gürsel., & E. Oral, S. (1972). “Cumhuriyetten bu Yana İstanbul’un Planlaması,” Mimarlık, issue 7, 65-118.
  6. Erkılıç, G. (2019). This is not a line: Transformation of the Waterfront in Istanbul, ongoing doctoral research, supervisors: Assoc. Prof. Dr. İpek Akpınar and Prof. Dr. Murat Güvenç, Istanbul Technical University, Department of Architecture. Erkılıç, G., Akpınar, İ. (2017). Kıyı Kenar Çizgisi: Koruma ve Kentsel Coğrafya Arasında İstanbul Kıyısının Değişimleri Üzerine Haritalar, Koruma: Geçmiş, Bugün, Gelecek Arasındaki Diyalog Sempozyumu, 26-27-28 Ekim 2017,
  7. TED Üniversitesi, Ankara;
  8. TED Üniversitesi,
  9. Şehir Plancıları Odası Ankara Şubesi, ODTÜ Kültürel Mirası Koruma Lisansüstü Programı işbirliği ile, Genişletilmiş Bildiri Kitabı ISBN 978-605-01-1076-0; s.312-320.
  10. Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the outside: Essays on V