Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Students’ perceptions of BIM learning scenario in architectural education

Pages
195–210
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We providethe framework used to plan the scenario, describe the scenario setting, presentstudents’ responses obtained through focus group, outline the lessons learned anddiscuss their implications for the future advancement of BIM in architecturaleducation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The inclusion of BIM in architecture curricula, in addition to those in engineeringand construction, has gathered significant pace over recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thepatterns of this inclusion vary significantly from country to country havingdifferent approaches, strategies, methods, and challenges associated with professionaland academic environment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We providethe framework used to plan the scenario, describe the scenario setting, presentstudents’ responses obtained through focus group, outline the lessons learned anddiscuss their implications for the future advancement of BIM in architecturaleducation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The inclusion of BIM in architecture curricula, in addition to those in engineeringand construction, has gathered significant pace over recent years. Thepatterns of this inclusion vary significantly from country to country havingdifferent approaches, strategies, methods, and challenges associated with professionaland academic environment. In countries like Turkey, many architectureeducators still ask: ‘What is BIM and why do we need it?”. This paper presentsone part of a larger research aiming to develop different ‘BIM learning scenarios’for architecture schools which had not yet developed BIM tradition. The BIMlearning scenario represents a flexible structure organized within the agenda offour basic questions: why (objectives), what (contents), how (methods), and who(management). The broader research proposes a strategy for introducing BIM inarchitectural education. The strategy is defined by the means of an exchange ofexperience between the academic world and practice. It also prioritizes self-learningand student-centered approach which are one of the key requirements of 21stcentury curricula. The current paper demonstrates students’ perceptions of theproposed BIM learning scenario obtained through focus group study. We providethe framework used to plan the scenario, describe the scenario setting, presentstudents’ responses obtained through focus group, outline the lessons learned anddiscuss their implications for the future advancement of BIM in architecturaleducation.

🔖

Cite This Article

ISANOVIC, H. A., ÇOLAKOĞLU, B. (2020). Students’ perceptions of BIM learning scenario in architectural education. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 195–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/354941

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abdirad, H., & Dossick, C. S. (2016). BIM curriculum design in architecture, engineering, and construction education: a systematic review. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 21(17 ), 250-271.
  2. AIA (2007). Integrated project delivery: A Guide. American Institute of Architects, AIA California Council. Aksamija, A. (2017). BIM in Architectural Education: Teaching Advanced Digital Technologies to Beginner Designers. The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 11(2), 13-25.
  3. Ambrose, M. A. (2007). BIM and integrated practice as provocateurs of design education. Paper presented at the Digitization and Globalization: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia., Nanjing, China: Southeast University and Nanjing University. Ambrose, M. A., & Fry, K. M. (2012). Re: Thinking BIM in the Design Studio- Beyond Tools… Approaching Ways of Thinking. Paper presented at the CAAD, INNOVATION, PRACTICE: 6th International Conference Proceedings of the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain: The Kingdom University. Barison, M., & Santos, E. (2018). Advances in BIM Education. In R. F. Ivan Mutis, and Carol C. Menassa (Ed.), Transforming Engineering Education: Innovative Computer-Mediated Learning Technologies (pp. 45-122). Reston ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers. Becerik-Gerber, B., Gerber, D. J., & Ku, K. (2011). The pace of technological innovation in architecture, engineering, and construction education: integrating recent trends into the curricula. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 16(24), 411-432.
  4. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp.1-18). Retreived on: November, 3, 2020, from: https://peer.asee.org/theflipped- classroom-a-survey-of-the-research Cheng, R. (2006). Questioning the role of BIM in architectural education. AECbytes Viewpoint, 26. Clayton, M., Ozener, O., Haliburton, J., & Farias, F. (2010). Towards Studio 21: Experiments in Design Education Using BIM. Paper presented at the Disruption, modeling and construction: changing dialogues: Proceedings of the XIV Congress of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de los Andes. Deamer, P. (2011). BIM in Academia. In P. Deamer & P. G. Bernstein (Eds.), BIM in Academia (pp