Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Trends in interoperability in building information modeling (BIM) research: A scientometric analysis of authors and articles

Pages
169–184
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further, theclassification of articles in the research field was suggested as “collaboration andsustainability-based”, “BIM adoption”, “BIM implementation at process-level”,“BIM implementation in-country and at industry-level”, and “ BIM integration”.The research results are expected to contribute to academicians, professionals andindustry stakeholders for understanding the gaps and trends in interoperabilityin BIM research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Stakeholders with various backgrounds from different industries join togetherto realize a construction project that is unique in nature and is developed by anad-hoc community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This type of formation shapes a dynamic and cooperative organization.Building information modeling (BIM) technology can be a valuableasset for sustainable, energy-efficient, safe and cost-effective building production.However, the content and context of the construction projects increase the sizeand complexity of data to be communicated, which in turn results in data lossthroughout the demanding and costly project life cycle.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further, theclassification of articles in the research field was suggested as “collaboration andsustainability-based”, “BIM adoption”, “BIM implementation at process-level”,“BIM implementation in-country and at industry-level”, and “ BIM integration”.The research results are expected to contribute to academicians, professionals andindustry stakeholders for understanding the gaps and trends in interoperabilityin BIM research.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Stakeholders with various backgrounds from different industries join togetherto realize a construction project that is unique in nature and is developed by anad-hoc community. This type of formation shapes a dynamic and cooperative organization.Building information modeling (BIM) technology can be a valuableasset for sustainable, energy-efficient, safe and cost-effective building production.However, the content and context of the construction projects increase the sizeand complexity of data to be communicated, which in turn results in data lossthroughout the demanding and costly project life cycle. Interoperability is thekey to handle the data loss problem. The main aim of this research is to picturethe status and trend in “interoperability” in BIM research with adopting bibliometricsearch and scientometric analysis for a broader understanding. Data werecollected through an intensive investigation of interoperability in BIM researchand selected through using Boolean Syntax, operators, and further limitations.477 articles from the Scopus database were utilized for scientometric analysisand mapping. The research gaps were diagnosed. The potential future researchneeds and trends of interoperability in BIM research were proposed. Further, theclassification of articles in the research field was suggested as “collaboration andsustainability-based”, “BIM adoption”, “BIM implementation at process-level”,“BIM implementation in-country and at industry-level”, and “ BIM integration”.The research results are expected to contribute to academicians, professionals andindustry stakeholders for understanding the gaps and trends in interoperabilityin BIM research.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, G. B. (2020). Trends in interoperability in building information modeling (BIM) research: A scientometric analysis of authors and articles. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 169–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/354938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Aghaei-Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5). doi: 10.5539/ass. v9n5p18 Arayici, Y., Fernando, T., Munoz, V., & Bassanino, M. (2018). Interoperability specification development for integrated BIM use in performance based design. Automation in Construction, 85, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. autcon.2017.10.018 Azhar, S. Khalfan, M. & Maqsood, T. (2012). Building information modeling (BIM): now and beyond. The Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 12 (4) 15–28, https:// doi.org/10. 5130/ajceb.v12i4.3032. Becerik-Gerber, B., Jazizadeh, F., Li, N., & Calis, G. (2012). Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), 431–442. doi: 10.1061/ (asce)co.1943-7862.0000433 Becerik-Gerber, B. & Rice, S. (2010). The perceived value of building information modeling in the U.S. building industry. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 15, 185-201. ISSN 1874-4753. http://www. itcon.org/2010/15 Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 971–980. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001 Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2012). systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 9781473912465 Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66(2), 327–343. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0024-1
  2. Bynum, P., Issa, R. R. A., & Olbina, S. (2013). Building information modeling in support of sustainable design and construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/ (asce)co.1943-7862.0000560 Cao, D., Li, H., Wang, G., Luo, X., & Tan, D. (2018). Relationship network structure and organizational competitiveness: evidence from BIM implementation practices in the construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(3), 04018005. https:// doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943- 5479.0000600 Cavalliere, C., Dell’Osso, G. R., Pierucci, A., & Iannone, F. (2018). Life cycle assessment data structure for building information modelling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jc